public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>,
	Junaid Shahid <junaids@google.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Skip no-op changes in TDP MMU functions
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 11:51:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YAiJrsyC1KSTKycg@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210112181041.356734-7-bgardon@google.com>

On Tue, Jan 12, 2021, Ben Gardon wrote:
> Skip setting SPTEs if no change is expected.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>
>
Nit on all of these, can you remove the extra newline between the Reviewed-by
and SOB?

> Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> index 1987da0da66e..2650fa9fe066 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> @@ -882,6 +882,9 @@ static bool wrprot_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
>  		    !is_last_spte(iter.old_spte, iter.level))
>  			continue;
>  
> +		if (!(iter.old_spte & PT_WRITABLE_MASK))

Include the new check with the existing if statement?  I think it makes sense to
group all the checks on old_spte.

> +			continue;
> +
>  		new_spte = iter.old_spte & ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
>  
>  		tdp_mmu_set_spte_no_dirty_log(kvm, &iter, new_spte);
> @@ -1079,6 +1082,9 @@ static bool set_dirty_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
>  		if (!is_shadow_present_pte(iter.old_spte))
>  			continue;
>  
> +		if (iter.old_spte & shadow_dirty_mask)

Same comment here.

> +			continue;
> +

Unrelated to this patch, but it got me looking at the code: shouldn't
clear_dirty_pt_masked() clear the bit in @mask before checking whether or not
the spte needs to be modified?  That way the early break kicks in after sptes
are checked, not necessarily written.  E.g.

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 2650fa9fe066..d8eeae910cbf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -1010,21 +1010,21 @@ static void clear_dirty_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
                    !(mask & (1UL << (iter.gfn - gfn))))
                        continue;

-               if (wrprot || spte_ad_need_write_protect(iter.old_spte)) {
-                       if (is_writable_pte(iter.old_spte))
-                               new_spte = iter.old_spte & ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
-                       else
-                               continue;
-               } else {
-                       if (iter.old_spte & shadow_dirty_mask)
-                               new_spte = iter.old_spte & ~shadow_dirty_mask;
-                       else
-                               continue;
-               }
-
-               tdp_mmu_set_spte_no_dirty_log(kvm, &iter, new_spte);
-
                mask &= ~(1UL << (iter.gfn - gfn));
+
+               if (wrprot || spte_ad_need_write_protect(iter.old_spte)) {
+                       if (is_writable_pte(iter.old_spte))
+                               new_spte = iter.old_spte & ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
+                       else
+                               continue;
+               } else {
+                       if (iter.old_spte & shadow_dirty_mask)
+                               new_spte = iter.old_spte & ~shadow_dirty_mask;
+                       else
+                               continue;
+               }
+
+               tdp_mmu_set_spte_no_dirty_log(kvm, &iter, new_spte);
        }
 }


>  		new_spte = iter.old_spte | shadow_dirty_mask;
>  
>  		tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, &iter, new_spte);
> -- 
> 2.30.0.284.gd98b1dd5eaa7-goog
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-20 19:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-12 18:10 [PATCH 00/24] Allow parallel page faults with TDP MMU Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 01/24] locking/rwlocks: Add contention detection for rwlocks Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 02/24] sched: Add needbreak " Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 03/24] sched: Add cond_resched_rwlock Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 04/24] kvm: x86/mmu: change TDP MMU yield function returns to match cond_resched Ben Gardon
2021-01-20 18:38   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-21 20:22     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-26 14:11     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 05/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Fix yielding in TDP MMU Ben Gardon
2021-01-20 19:28   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-22  1:06     ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 06/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Skip no-op changes in TDP MMU functions Ben Gardon
2021-01-20 19:51   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2021-01-25 23:51     ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 07/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Add comment on __tdp_mmu_set_spte Ben Gardon
2021-01-26 14:13   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 08/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Add lockdep when setting a TDP MMU SPTE Ben Gardon
2021-01-20 19:58   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-26 14:13   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 09/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Don't redundantly clear TDP MMU pt memory Ben Gardon
2021-01-20 20:06   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-26 14:14   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 10/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Factor out handle disconnected pt Ben Gardon
2021-01-20 20:30   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-26 14:14   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 11/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Put TDP MMU PT walks in RCU read-critical section Ben Gardon
2021-01-20 22:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 12/24] kvm: x86/kvm: RCU dereference tdp mmu page table links Ben Gardon
2021-01-22 18:32   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-26 18:17     ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 13/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Only free tdp_mmu pages after a grace period Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 14/24] kvm: mmu: Wrap mmu_lock lock / unlock in a function Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 15/24] kvm: mmu: Wrap mmu_lock cond_resched and needbreak Ben Gardon
2021-01-21  0:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-21 20:17     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-26 14:38     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-26 17:47       ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-26 17:55         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-26 18:11           ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-26 20:47             ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-27 20:08               ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-27 20:55                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-27 21:20                   ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-28  8:18                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 16/24] kvm: mmu: Wrap mmu_lock assertions Ben Gardon
2021-01-26 14:29   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 17/24] kvm: mmu: Move mmu_lock to struct kvm_arch Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 18/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Use an rwlock for the x86 TDP MMU Ben Gardon
2021-01-21  0:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 19/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Protect tdp_mmu_pages with a lock Ben Gardon
2021-01-21 19:22   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-21 21:32     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-26 14:27       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-26 21:47         ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-26 22:02         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-26 22:09           ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-27 12:40           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-26 13:37   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-26 21:07     ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 20/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Add atomic option for setting SPTEs Ben Gardon
2021-01-26 14:21   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 21/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Use atomic ops to set SPTEs in TDP MMU map Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 22/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Flush TLBs after zap in TDP MMU PF handler Ben Gardon
2021-01-21  0:05   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 23/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Freeze SPTEs in disconnected pages Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 24/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Allow parallel page faults for the TDP MMU Ben Gardon
2021-01-21  0:55   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-26 21:57     ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-27 17:14       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-26 13:37   ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YAiJrsyC1KSTKycg@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=junaids@google.com \
    --cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=pfeiner@google.com \
    --cc=pshier@google.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com \
    --cc=yulei.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox