From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A48D5C433DB for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 11:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728D864EC4 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 11:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230417AbhBSL7q (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Feb 2021 06:59:46 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:26620 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230144AbhBSL7o (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Feb 2021 06:59:44 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1613735897; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0Oat3ESJK0nJqOq3w4Qti1Q4yrZeJ9Lqn+lQdEnc1XI=; b=ZFsCDtKFcMf3IX74CHLMrcUhLnBjGIw8XKuqRBe8HLvONNe62tADNr43C7L4bw3tKvKiLz 4eZT1HQfZsBdvVE5erUv/6zHx1O+ft7VxHh50RHGzpmqGrfVjHnFBRjk9HGaIA9OCLlDMx iqE9vWHtco7qmk+eJA5BpHFsoEgSqao= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-388-Rbk-XNaZOBKnFnbM5wF23Q-1; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 06:58:14 -0500 X-MC-Unique: Rbk-XNaZOBKnFnbM5wF23Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3B0F107ACC7; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 11:58:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-113-184.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.184]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 508F56086F; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 11:58:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 11:57:57 +0000 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell , Radoslaw Biernacki , kvm@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand , Mark Cave-Ayland , Thomas Huth , "Edgar E. Iglesias" , Huacai Chen , Halil Pasic , Christian Borntraeger , =?utf-8?B?SGVydsOp?= Poussineau , Leif Lindholm , Aleksandar Rikalo , Eduardo Habkost , Alistair Francis , Richard Henderson , Greg Kurz , qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, David Gibson , Cornelia Huck , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , Aurelien Jarno Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] hw/boards: Introduce 'kvm_supported' field to MachineClass Message-ID: Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= References: <20210219114428.1936109-1-philmd@redhat.com> <20210219114428.1936109-3-philmd@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20210219114428.1936109-3-philmd@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/2.0.5 (2021-01-21) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 12:44:23PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Introduce the 'kvm_supported' field to express whether > a machine supports KVM acceleration or not. > > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé > --- > include/hw/boards.h | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/hw/boards.h b/include/hw/boards.h > index 68d3d10f6b0..0959aa743ee 100644 > --- a/include/hw/boards.h > +++ b/include/hw/boards.h > @@ -129,6 +129,8 @@ typedef struct { > * Return the type of KVM corresponding to the kvm-type string option or > * computed based on other criteria such as the host kernel capabilities > * (which can't be negative), or -1 on error. > + * @kvm_supported: > + * true if '-enable-kvm' option is supported and false otherwise. Is the behaviour reported really related to KVM specifically, as opposed to all hardware based virt backends ? eg is it actually a case of some machine types being "tcg_only" ? Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|