public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
	<x86@kernel.org>, Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" 
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] KVM: nVMX: delay loading of PDPTRs to KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 17:27:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YGdUBvliVWoF0tVl@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210401141814.1029036-2-mlevitsk@redhat.com>

On Thu, Apr 01, 2021, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> Similar to the rest of guest page accesses after migration,
> this should be delayed to KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES
> request.

FWIW, I still object to this approach, and this patch has a plethora of issues.

I'm not against deferring various state loading to KVM_RUN, but wholesale moving
all of GUEST_CR3 processing without in-depth consideration of all the side
effects is a really bad idea.

> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 14 +++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> index fd334e4aa6db..b44f1f6b68db 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> @@ -2564,11 +2564,6 @@ static int prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Shadow page tables on either EPT or shadow page tables. */
> -	if (nested_vmx_load_cr3(vcpu, vmcs12->guest_cr3, nested_cpu_has_ept(vmcs12),
> -				entry_failure_code))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * Immediately write vmcs02.GUEST_CR3.  It will be propagated to vmcs12
>  	 * on nested VM-Exit, which can occur without actually running L2 and
> @@ -3109,11 +3104,16 @@ static bool nested_get_evmcs_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  static bool nested_get_vmcs12_pages(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	struct vmcs12 *vmcs12 = get_vmcs12(vcpu);
> +	enum vm_entry_failure_code entry_failure_code;
>  	struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
>  	struct kvm_host_map *map;
>  	struct page *page;
>  	u64 hpa;
>  
> +	if (nested_vmx_load_cr3(vcpu, vmcs12->guest_cr3, nested_cpu_has_ept(vmcs12),
> +				&entry_failure_code))

This results in KVM_RUN returning 0 without filling vcpu->run->exit_reason.
Speaking from experience, debugging those types of issues is beyond painful.

It also means CR3 is double loaded in the from_vmentry case.

And it will cause KVM to incorrectly return NVMX_VMENTRY_KVM_INTERNAL_ERROR
if a consistency check fails when nested_get_vmcs12_pages() is called on
from_vmentry.  E.g. run unit tests with this and it will silently disappear.

diff --git a/x86/vmx_tests.c b/x86/vmx_tests.c
index bbb006a..b8ccc69 100644
--- a/x86/vmx_tests.c
+++ b/x86/vmx_tests.c
@@ -8172,6 +8172,16 @@ static void test_guest_segment_base_addr_fields(void)
        vmcs_write(GUEST_AR_ES, ar_saved);
 }

+static void test_guest_cr3(void)
+{
+       u64 cr3_saved = vmcs_read(GUEST_CR3);
+
+       vmcs_write(GUEST_CR3, -1ull);
+       test_guest_state("Bad CR3 fails VM-Enter", true, -1ull, "GUEST_CR3");
+
+       vmcs_write(GUEST_DR7, cr3_saved);
+}
+
 /*
  * Check that the virtual CPU checks the VMX Guest State Area as
  * documented in the Intel SDM.
@@ -8181,6 +8191,8 @@ static void vmx_guest_state_area_test(void)
        vmx_set_test_stage(1);
        test_set_guest(guest_state_test_main);

+       test_guest_cr3();
+
        /*
         * The IA32_SYSENTER_ESP field and the IA32_SYSENTER_EIP field
         * must each contain a canonical address.


> +		return false;
> +
>  	if (nested_cpu_has2(vmcs12, SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES)) {
>  		/*
>  		 * Translate L1 physical address to host physical
> @@ -3357,6 +3357,10 @@ enum nvmx_vmentry_status nested_vmx_enter_non_root_mode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (from_vmentry) {
> +		if (nested_vmx_load_cr3(vcpu, vmcs12->guest_cr3,
> +		    nested_cpu_has_ept(vmcs12), &entry_failure_code))

This alignment is messed up; it looks like two separate function calls.

> +			goto vmentry_fail_vmexit_guest_mode;
> +
>  		failed_index = nested_vmx_load_msr(vcpu,
>  						   vmcs12->vm_entry_msr_load_addr,
>  						   vmcs12->vm_entry_msr_load_count);
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-02 17:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-01 14:18 [PATCH 0/6] Introduce KVM_{GET|SET}_SREGS2 and fix PDPTR migration Maxim Levitsky
2021-04-01 14:18 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: nVMX: delay loading of PDPTRs to KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES Maxim Levitsky
2021-04-01 14:31   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-02 17:27   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2021-04-06 10:22     ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-04-01 14:18 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: nSVM: call nested_svm_load_cr3 on nested state load Maxim Levitsky
2021-04-01 14:31   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-01 14:18 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86: introduce kvm_register_clear_available Maxim Levitsky
2021-04-01 14:31   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-05 17:03   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-04-01 14:18 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: x86: Introduce KVM_GET_SREGS2 / KVM_SET_SREGS2 Maxim Levitsky
2021-04-01 14:44   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-01 17:10     ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-04-01 17:33       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-01 14:18 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: nSVM: avoid loading PDPTRs after migration when possible Maxim Levitsky
2021-04-05 17:01   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-04-06 10:12     ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-04-01 14:18 ` [PATCH 6/6] KVM: nVMX: " Maxim Levitsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YGdUBvliVWoF0tVl@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox