Re: [PATCH v7 11/12] vduse: Introduce VDUSE - vDPA Device in Userspace

Jason Wang
2021-05-31T04:39:06Z

在 2021/5/31 下午12:27, Yongji Xie 写道:
> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 10:31 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> 在 2021/5/27 下午9:17, Yongji Xie 写道:
>>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 4:41 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> 在 2021/5/27 下午3:34, Yongji Xie 写道:
>>>>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 1:40 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 在 2021/5/27 下午1:08, Yongji Xie 写道:
>>>>>>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 1:00 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 在 2021/5/27 下午12:57, Yongji Xie 写道:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 12:13 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 在 2021/5/17 下午5:55, Xie Yongji 写道:
>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>> +static int vduse_dev_msg_sync(struct vduse_dev *dev,
>>>>>>>>>>> + struct vduse_dev_msg *msg)
>>>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>>>> + init_waitqueue_head(&msg->waitq);
>>>>>>>>>>> + spin_lock(&dev->msg_lock);
>>>>>>>>>>> + vduse_enqueue_msg(&dev->send_list, msg);
>>>>>>>>>>> + wake_up(&dev->waitq);
>>>>>>>>>>> + spin_unlock(&dev->msg_lock);
>>>>>>>>>>> + wait_event_killable(msg->waitq, msg->completed);
>>>>>>>>>> What happens if the userspace(malicous) doesn't give a response forever?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It looks like a DOS. If yes, we need to consider a way to fix that.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How about using wait_event_killable_timeout() instead?
>>>>>>>> Probably, and then we need choose a suitable timeout and more important,
>>>>>>>> need to report the failure to virtio.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Makes sense to me. But it looks like some
>>>>>>> vdpa_config_ops/virtio_config_ops such as set_status() didn't have a
>>>>>>> return value. Now I add a WARN_ON() for the failure. Do you mean we
>>>>>>> need to add some change for virtio core to handle the failure?
>>>>>> Maybe, but I'm not sure how hard we can do that.
>>>>>>
>>>>> We need to change all virtio device drivers in this way.
>>>> Probably.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> We had NEEDS_RESET but it looks we don't implement it.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Could it handle the failure of get_feature() and get/set_config()?
>>>> Looks not:
>>>>
>>>> "
>>>>
>>>> The device SHOULD set DEVICE_NEEDS_RESET when it enters an error state
>>>> that a reset is needed. If DRIVER_OK is set, after it sets
>>>> DEVICE_NEEDS_RESET, the device MUST send a device configuration change
>>>> notification to the driver.
>>>>
>>>> "
>>>>
>>>> This looks implies that NEEDS_RESET may only work after device is
>>>> probed. But in the current design, even the reset() is not reliable.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Or a rough idea is that maybe need some relaxing to be coupled loosely
>>>>>> with userspace. E.g the device (control path) is implemented in the
>>>>>> kernel but the datapath is implemented in the userspace like TUN/TAP.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I think it can work for most cases. One problem is that the set_config
>>>>> might change the behavior of the data path at runtime, e.g.
>>>>> virtnet_set_mac_address() in the virtio-net driver and
>>>>> cache_type_store() in the virtio-blk driver. Not sure if this path is
>>>>> able to return before the datapath is aware of this change.
>>>> Good point.
>>>>
>>>> But set_config() should be rare:
>>>>
>>>> E.g in the case of virtio-net with VERSION_1, config space is read only,
>>>> and it was set via control vq.
>>>>
>>>> For block, we can
>>>>
>>>> 1) start from without WCE or
>>>> 2) we add a config change notification to userspace or
>>> I prefer this way. And I think we also need to do similar things for
>>> set/get_vq_state().
>>
>> Yes, I agree.
>>
> Hi Jason,
>
> Now I'm working on this. But I found the config change notification
> must be synchronous in the virtio-blk case, which means the kernel
> still needs to wait for the response from userspace in set_config().
> Otherwise, some I/Os might still run the old way after we change the
> cache_type in sysfs.
>
> The simple ways to solve this problem are:
>
> 1. Only support read-only config space, disable WCE as you suggested
> 2. Add a return value to set_config() and handle the failure only in
> virtio-blk driver
> 3. Print some warnings after timeout since it only affects the
> dataplane which is under userspace's control
>
> Any suggestions?

Let's go without WCE first and make VDUSE work first. We can then think
of a solution for WCE on top.

Thanks

>
> Thanks,
> Yongji
>