From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai+lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Venkatesh Srinivas <venkateshs@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: Guard cpusmask NULL check with CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 21:57:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YSa8z5vQKbFuLtew@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJhGHyB1RjBLRLtaS80XQSTb0g35smxnBQPjEp-BwieKu1cwXw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 8:09 AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
> > @@ -277,6 +277,14 @@ bool kvm_make_vcpus_request_mask(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int req,
> > if (!(req & KVM_REQUEST_NO_WAKEUP) && kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu))
> > continue;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * tmp can be NULL if cpumasks are allocated off stack, as
> > + * allocation of the mask is deliberately not fatal and is
> > + * handled by falling back to kicking all online CPUs.
> > + */
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK) && !tmp)
> > + continue;
> > +
>
> Hello, Sean
>
> I don't think it is a good idea to reinvent the cpumask_available().
Using cpumask_available() is waaaay better, thanks!
Vitaly / Paolo, take this one instead?
From deff3e168c0612a2947d1ef29e488282631a788c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 13:36:21 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: Use cpumask_available() to check for NULL cpumask when
kicking vCPUs
Check for a NULL cpumask_var_t when kicking multiple vCPUs via
cpumask_available(), which performs a !NULL check if and only if cpumasks
are configured to be allocated off-stack. This is a meaningless
optimization, e.g. avoids a TEST+Jcc and TEST+CMOV on x86, but more
importantly helps document that the NULL check is necessary even though
all callers pass in a local variable.
No functional change intended.
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 786b914db98f..2082aceffbf6 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -245,9 +245,13 @@ static void ack_flush(void *_completed)
{
}
-static inline bool kvm_kick_many_cpus(const struct cpumask *cpus, bool wait)
+static inline bool kvm_kick_many_cpus(cpumask_var_t tmp, bool wait)
{
- if (unlikely(!cpus))
+ const struct cpumask *cpus;
+
+ if (likely(cpumask_available(tmp)))
+ cpus = tmp;
+ else
cpus = cpu_online_mask;
if (cpumask_empty(cpus))
@@ -277,6 +281,14 @@ bool kvm_make_vcpus_request_mask(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int req,
if (!(req & KVM_REQUEST_NO_WAKEUP) && kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu))
continue;
+ /*
+ * tmp can be "unavailable" if cpumasks are allocated off stack
+ * as allocation of the mask is deliberately not fatal and is
+ * handled by falling back to kicking all online CPUs.
+ */
+ if (!cpumask_available(tmp))
+ continue;
+
/*
* Note, the vCPU could get migrated to a different pCPU at any
* point after kvm_request_needs_ipi(), which could result in
@@ -288,7 +300,7 @@ bool kvm_make_vcpus_request_mask(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int req,
* were reading SPTEs _before_ any changes were finalized. See
* kvm_vcpu_kick() for more details on handling requests.
*/
- if (tmp != NULL && kvm_request_needs_ipi(vcpu, req)) {
+ if (kvm_request_needs_ipi(vcpu, req)) {
cpu = READ_ONCE(vcpu->cpu);
if (cpu != -1 && cpu != me)
__cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, tmp);
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-25 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-21 0:04 [PATCH 0/2] VM: Fix a benign race in kicking vCPUs Sean Christopherson
2021-08-21 0:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: Clean up benign vcpu->cpu data races when " Sean Christopherson
2021-08-23 7:49 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-08-21 0:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: Guard cpusmask NULL check with CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK Sean Christopherson
2021-08-23 7:54 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-08-25 4:05 ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-08-25 21:57 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2021-08-26 10:24 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YSa8z5vQKbFuLtew@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai+lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=venkateshs@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox