From: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
To: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, drjones@redhat.com,
alexandru.elisei@arm.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
oupton@google.com, james.morse@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
shuah@kernel.org, jingzhangos@google.com, pshier@google.com,
rananta@google.com, reijiw@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm64: selftests: test for vgic redist above the VM IPA size
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 11:22:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YTpQ4y37RhaQTJ3m@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83282104-ca04-c4f5-3570-c884a22ab667@redhat.com>
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 03:54:31PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> On 9/8/21 11:03 PM, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> > This test attempts (and fails) to set a redistributor region using the
> > legacy KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST that's partially above the
> > VM-specified IPA size.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
> > ---
> > .../testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_init.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_init.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_init.c
> > index 623f31a14326..6dd7b5e91421 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_init.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_init.c
> > @@ -285,6 +285,49 @@ static void test_vcpus_then_vgic(void)
> > vm_gic_destroy(&v);
> > }
> >
> > +static void test_redist_above_vm_pa_bits(enum vm_guest_mode mode)
> > +{
> > + struct vm_gic v;
> > + int ret, i;
> > + uint32_t vcpuids[] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, };
> > + int pa_bits = vm_guest_mode_params[mode].pa_bits;
> > + uint64_t addr, psize = 1ULL << pa_bits;
> > +
> > + /* Add vcpu 1 */
> > + v.vm = vm_create_with_vcpus(mode, 1, DEFAULT_GUEST_PHY_PAGES,
> > + 0, 0, guest_code, vcpuids);
> > + v.gic_fd = kvm_create_device(v.vm, KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V3, false);
> > +
> > + /* Set space for half a redist, we have 1 vcpu, so this fails. */
> > + addr = psize - 0x10000;
> > + ret = _kvm_device_access(v.gic_fd, KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_ADDR,
> > + KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST, &addr, true);
> > + TEST_ASSERT(ret && errno == EINVAL, "not enough space for one redist");
> > +
> > + /* Set space for 3 redists, we have 1 vcpu, so this succeeds. */
> > + addr = psize - (3 * 2 * 0x10000);
> > + kvm_device_access(v.gic_fd, KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_ADDR,
> > + KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST, &addr, true);
>
> I think you need to test both the old API (KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST)
> and the new one (KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST_REGION).
>
> Can't you integrate those new checks in existing tests,
> subtest_redist_regions() and subtest_dist_rdist() which already tests
> base addr beyond IPA limit (but not range end unfortunately). look for
> E2BIG.
>
Had some issues adapting subtest_dist_rdist() as the IPA range check for
ADDR_TYPE_REDIST is done at 1st vcpu run. subtest_dist_rdist() is
already used to set overlapping dist/redist regions, which is then
checked to generate EINVAL on 1st vcpu run. If subtest_dist_rdist() is
also used to set the redist region above phys_size, then there won't be
a way of checking that the vcpu run fails because of both the overlap
and IPA issue. It was simpler and cleaner to just add a new function
for the ADDR_TYPE_REDIST IPA range test. Will adapt
subtest_redist_regions() as the check for ADDR_TYPE_REDIST_REGION can be
done when setting the regions.
Related Question:
Both the KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST and KVM_RUN currently return
EINVAL with my proposed change (not E2BIG). I will change
KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST to fail with E2BIG, but will leave KVM_RUN
failing with EINVAL. Would you say that's the correct behavior?
Thanks,
Ricardo
> Thanks
>
> Eric
> > +
> > + addr = 0x00000;
> > + kvm_device_access(v.gic_fd, KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_ADDR,
> > + KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_DIST, &addr, true);
> > +
> > + /* Add three vcpus (2, 3, 4). */
> > + for (i = 1; i < 4; ++i)
> > + vm_vcpu_add_default(v.vm, vcpuids[i], guest_code);
> > +
> > + kvm_device_access(v.gic_fd, KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CTRL,
> > + KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CTRL_INIT, NULL, true);
> > +
> > + /* Attempt to run a vcpu without enough redist space. */
> > + ret = run_vcpu(v.vm, vcpuids[3]);
> > + TEST_ASSERT(ret && errno == EINVAL,
> > + "redist base+size above IPA detected on 1st vcpu run");
> > +
> > + vm_gic_destroy(&v);
> > +}
> > +
> > static void test_new_redist_regions(void)
> > {
> > void *dummy = NULL;
> > @@ -542,6 +585,7 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
> > test_kvm_device();
> > test_vcpus_then_vgic();
> > test_vgic_then_vcpus();
> > + test_redist_above_vm_pa_bits(VM_MODE_DEFAULT);
> > test_new_redist_regions();
> > test_typer_accesses();
> > test_last_bit_redist_regions();
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-09 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-08 21:03 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Missing check for redist region above the VM IPA size Ricardo Koller
2021-09-08 21:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: vgic: check redist region is not " Ricardo Koller
2021-09-08 21:32 ` Oliver Upton
2021-09-08 21:50 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-09-08 22:00 ` Oliver Upton
2021-09-09 10:20 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-09-09 14:43 ` Eric Auger
2021-09-09 16:47 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-09-10 8:28 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-09-10 8:42 ` Eric Auger
2021-09-10 19:32 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-09-13 8:51 ` Eric Auger
[not found] ` <cc916884-9b76-9784-c3ce-3469cb7682ab@arm.com>
2021-09-14 3:20 ` Ricardo Koller
[not found] ` <1906a1cf-3fb5-0ecf-4422-bef1ac6eef90@arm.com>
2021-09-20 21:01 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-09-08 21:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm64: selftests: test for vgic redist " Ricardo Koller
2021-09-09 13:54 ` Eric Auger
2021-09-09 18:22 ` Ricardo Koller [this message]
2021-09-10 7:12 ` Eric Auger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YTpQ4y37RhaQTJ3m@google.com \
--to=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pshier@google.com \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=reijiw@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox