From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B33C433EF for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 21:27:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9F661A02 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 21:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240862AbhI3V3a (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Sep 2021 17:29:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48516 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229806AbhI3V31 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Sep 2021 17:29:27 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x434.google.com (mail-pf1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::434]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92F90C06176A for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 14:27:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x434.google.com with SMTP id 187so1728283pfc.10 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 14:27:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=r0i+4oh5ttmvKzGJaF4duXEtIwD8cGanxYr+JafZRCc=; b=Lepz8HOPy8gYGMfKpd+iWWTvMcOMxwafkPOVcPvRlPcbhH7cbzDgC6rXgoDcB+zVgB Ff3KhLPBGGD3uVIja2Dm3jbPkzC+TeUU8IrXKlsd3i5Zeah4yYApRrNVxE5PepUh/zlo tkV+otCyCWwkHESL4eOLtedqPje8r8uYpgjKn4zlF+aynH+jiFhv8hGsPGXohQefpwnx kCEUKtsw2XiAqQ4B1eW8J1udWHntxC5pW0LHt518UNkkS5HK1bIfRaONCerOCQvBsNiW 4kALVECg/PGMffjjw+V2LK2jp5wiSqNJ5/XaWD36qrHeXxtzdBFgKL7KX7HcOWcKVklx gE4w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=r0i+4oh5ttmvKzGJaF4duXEtIwD8cGanxYr+JafZRCc=; b=Ja1wwDvZbTgLGDUbOP0JGQJs8D5Bhbje8SlywclrG9dFizJGeRaLUPaajvCSnmQ9JY yf93anm0BRffF3lDjoW7m2HzPzZM4pRQ8nHeXUq6KMjNGqewTP4lZNX4EmvXuKRMhUO5 SsiKRy+LQM9uL/kZkTpiMiYylGaoUBUtPlDiGZixWe/uUiQ3mK8wIlVPxoQfa3ZVrY+3 O9xD3hJJ4UPiRg0UrjK7kEu28o2WRZ2DE2PXNq/WTVPP9OSGjF/d+EEKMM+dtKS3YVFO ZL/HrR5dy36TDEZVQr0gVyzc4XILn7Kh/caCjg4cyOq99PFOhf6/E2LOQDCNW60Ha4lp FoKg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533DPtxfTT3qfNlbB6eh90WEryh5VGvit7LgeGCV56WrfyfUlK8a IoOU6c9l8goLTiC49zF76abKXw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwokKb25gzszvdtUECo3bG3lRZr0uuSLd4XCMxKvvZtnpPLwddgYcgZEB3a0Ltdd5ZnEaTyGQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:40c:: with SMTP id 12mr6830835pge.406.1633037263905; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 14:27:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (150.12.83.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.83.12.150]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n3sm5723593pjv.15.2021.09.30.14.27.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 30 Sep 2021 14:27:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 14:27:39 -0700 From: Ricardo Koller To: Marc Zyngier Cc: eric.auger@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, drjones@redhat.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com, Paolo Bonzini , oupton@google.com, james.morse@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, shuah@kernel.org, jingzhangos@google.com, pshier@google.com, rananta@google.com, reijiw@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] KVM: arm64: selftests: Make vgic_init gic version agnostic Message-ID: References: <20210928184803.2496885-1-ricarkol@google.com> <20210928184803.2496885-6-ricarkol@google.com> <87ee96trnl.wl-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ee96trnl.wl-maz@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 09:05:18AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 18:12:59 +0100, > Eric Auger wrote: > > > > If the GICv3 supports compat with GICv2, I think you could be able to > > run both tests consecutively. So maybe don't return? > > You'll need to recreate a full VM though. Even if the HW supports the > compat mode, our GICv3 emulation doesn't. I'm not sure how much work would that entail, but sounds like it might be too much for a selftest. Thanks, Ricardo > > Thanks, > > M. > > -- > Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.