From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8848C433EF for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 15:38:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC176611EF for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 15:38:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231722AbhJSPk1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2021 11:40:27 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52842 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232804AbhJSPkX (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2021 11:40:23 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1031.google.com (mail-pj1-x1031.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1031]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FE51C061746 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 08:38:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1031.google.com with SMTP id oa4so252025pjb.2 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 08:38:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=4R24uiP3AWTPwnTkUy3o4jaYTgjkE8f9tFEPy2wfsfc=; b=Z206A9md+kGzg5G31WtDmERS6yZ+AJHUUxywdfU4LCrh0LyH+2ke2Trl4SHK0ysU7l jTZTLoxJznK6ham+QaAogE3fCmf3FjDXmMYW1o3SdC4VULQFcOdY4OHEp8514Iq773n0 fAHLCLfsuvUMPLFvf0nY8yBu7eCRioSCkYUZQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=4R24uiP3AWTPwnTkUy3o4jaYTgjkE8f9tFEPy2wfsfc=; b=0r4KeiikzDBSd5YETtl/N7eYIH2HhmmiLcjzjSYSRBvKbvRkcIBeb7e47+8LmBoeT9 jnPR6eSgb2fAZza6Fw0WE2SIoIlKZ1bXlTs4xYbi1QVv+F0t7IPJye5v+VB5ZtWAB7b5 bCDNDVg97hk6R/zuji9SzbQ0c0AQf44R1HqYEUaUHjM6b1f53mN27Oydxh4VtVaN3CC7 ZkeRAYK32BJWLgkWJNYYHnzKKRZsZ0qU2Nffu0mh+gj8hJw6usNG30UmFAqCXzht46n9 x7LU7jcV7gnlDqU2GENRdpUNB1aBWPdxyieB3F268IRqLwbW38LJwAutUgTxsYd8Lq0F w5Uw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533hVVxT4Lm/lScnY1AMrFdMDcbXz6az8Dztig1ngAWvcON3Oh2f Kc9jqnF1w1C2ZWUmukys6dNX0g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxTUXlRdWRfZs59UAiIjI2Eg1rfFSYbgdf3gjWiZkTkefYZ/VTjLY3CJ763AtjDmOA/dJwjzg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4b48:: with SMTP id mi8mr675489pjb.13.1634657889765; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 08:38:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([2409:10:2e40:5100:490f:f89:7449:e615]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x7sm16710686pfj.164.2021.10.19.08.38.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 19 Oct 2021 08:38:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 00:38:04 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: Paolo Bonzini , David Matlack Cc: Sean Christopherson , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , Suleiman Souhlal , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: Re: [PATCHV2 3/3] KVM: x86: add KVM_SET_MMU_PREFETCH ioctl Message-ID: References: <20211019153214.109519-1-senozhatsky@chromium.org> <20211019153214.109519-4-senozhatsky@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211019153214.109519-4-senozhatsky@chromium.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On (21/10/20 00:32), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > static int kvm_vm_ioctl_get_clock(struct kvm *kvm, void __user *argp) > { > struct kvm_clock_data data; > @@ -6169,6 +6189,15 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp, > case KVM_X86_SET_MSR_FILTER: > r = kvm_vm_ioctl_set_msr_filter(kvm, argp); > break; > + case KVM_SET_MMU_PREFETCH: { > + u64 val; > + > + r = -EFAULT; > + if (copy_from_user(&val, argp, sizeof(val))) > + goto out; > + r = kvm_arch_mmu_pte_prefetch(kvm, val); > + break; > + } A side question: is there any value in turning this into a per-VCPU ioctl? So that, say, on heterogeneous systems big cores can prefetch more than little cores, for instance.