public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: Simplify APICv update request logic
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 17:55:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YWR6nJLdR21CbGtz@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c446956c622d5f6561f5248c7f686033ffc2ee69.camel@redhat.com>

On Sun, Oct 10, 2021, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-10-08 at 18:01 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Drop confusing and flawed code that intentionally sets that per-VM APICv
> > inhibit mask after sending KVM_REQ_APICV_UPDATE to all vCPUs.  The code
> > is confusing because it's not obvious that there's no race between a CPU
> > seeing the request and consuming the new mask.  The code works only
> > because the request handling path takes the same lock, i.e. responding
> > vCPUs will be blocked until the full update completes.
> 
> Actually this code is here on purpose:
>
> While it is true that the main reader of apicv_inhibit_reasons (KVM_REQ_APICV_UPDATE handler)
> does take the kvm->arch.apicv_update_lock lock, so it will see the correct value
> regardless of this patch, the reason why this code first raises the KVM_REQ_APICV_UPDATE
> and only then updates the arch.apicv_inhibit_reasons is that I put a warning into svm_vcpu_run
> which checks that per cpu AVIC inhibit state matches the global AVIC inhibit state.
> 
> That warning proved to be very useful to ensure that AVIC inhibit works correctly.
> 
> If this patch is applied, the warning can no longer work reliably unless
> it takes the apicv_update_lock which will have a performance hit.
> 
> The reason is that if we just update apicv_inhibit_reasons, we can race
> with vCPU which is about to re-enter the guest mode and trigger this warning.

Ah, and it relies on kvm_make_all_cpus_request() to wait for vCPUs to ack the
IRQ before updating apicv_inhibit_reasons, and then relies on kvm_vcpu_update_apicv()
to stall on acquiring apicv_update_lock() so that the vCPU can't redo svm_vcpu_run()
without seeing the new inhibit state.

I'll drop this patch and send one to add comments, there are a lot of subtle/hidden
dependencies here.  Setting the inhibit _after_ the request in particular needs a
comment as it goes directly against the behavior of pretty much every other request
flow.

Thanks!

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-11 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-09  1:01 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: Fix and cleanup for recent AVIC changes Sean Christopherson
2021-10-09  1:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Use vCPU's APICv status when handling APIC_ACCESS memslot Sean Christopherson
2021-10-10 12:47   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-10-09  1:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: Simplify APICv update request logic Sean Christopherson
2021-10-10 12:49   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-10-11 17:55     ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2021-10-10 12:37 ` [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: Fix and cleanup for recent AVIC changes Maxim Levitsky
2021-10-11 14:27   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-10-11 16:58     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-10-12  9:53       ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-10-15 16:15         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-10-15 16:23           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-15 16:36             ` Sean Christopherson
2021-10-15 17:50               ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YWR6nJLdR21CbGtz@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox