From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, bp@suse.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, jarkko@kernel.org,
yang.zhong@intel.com, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] x86: sgx_vepc: implement SGX_IOC_VEPC_REMOVE ioctl
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 00:07:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YXIAwM0b+kIsx4af@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211021201155.1523989-3-pbonzini@redhat.com>
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> For bare-metal SGX on real hardware, the hardware provides guarantees
> SGX state at reboot. For instance, all pages start out uninitialized.
> The vepc driver provides a similar guarantee today for freshly-opened
> vepc instances, but guests such as Windows expect all pages to be in
> uninitialized state on startup, including after every guest reboot.
>
> Some userspace implementations of virtual SGX would rather avoid having
> to close and reopen the /dev/sgx_vepc file descriptor and re-mmap the
> virtual EPC. For example, they could sandbox themselves after the guest
> starts and forbid further calls to open(), in order to mitigate exploits
> from untrusted guests.
>
> Therefore, add a ioctl that does this with EREMOVE. Userspace can
> invoke the ioctl to bring its vEPC pages back to uninitialized state.
> There is a possibility that some pages fail to be removed if they are
> SECS pages, and the child and SECS pages could be in separate vEPC
> regions. Therefore, the ioctl returns the number of EREMOVE failures,
> telling userspace to try the ioctl again after it's done with all
> vEPC regions. A more verbose description of the correct usage and
> the possible error conditions is documented in sgx.rst.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-22 0:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-21 20:11 [PATCH v4 0/2] x86: sgx_vepc: implement ioctl to EREMOVE all pages Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-21 20:11 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] x86: sgx_vepc: extract sgx_vepc_remove_page Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-21 20:11 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] x86: sgx_vepc: implement SGX_IOC_VEPC_REMOVE ioctl Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-22 0:07 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2021-10-22 6:25 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] x86: sgx_vepc: implement ioctl to EREMOVE all pages Yang Zhong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YXIAwM0b+kIsx4af@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yang.zhong@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox