From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@gmail.com>,
Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 04/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Yield while processing disconnected_sps
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 18:50:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YY1l8EMsQyTDAAkT@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211110223010.1392399-5-bgardon@google.com>
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 02:29:55PM -0800, Ben Gardon wrote:
> When preparing to free disconnected SPs, the list can accumulate many
> entries; enough that it is likely necessary to yeild while queuing RCU
> callbacks to free the SPs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> index a448f0f2d993..c2a9f7acf8ef 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> @@ -513,7 +513,8 @@ static void handle_changed_spte(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, gfn_t gfn,
> * being removed from the paging structure and this function being called.
> */
> static void handle_disconnected_sps(struct kvm *kvm,
> - struct list_head *disconnected_sps)
> + struct list_head *disconnected_sps,
> + bool can_yield, bool shared)
> {
> struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
> struct kvm_mmu_page *next;
> @@ -521,6 +522,16 @@ static void handle_disconnected_sps(struct kvm *kvm,
> list_for_each_entry_safe(sp, next, disconnected_sps, link) {
> list_del(&sp->link);
> call_rcu(&sp->rcu_head, tdp_mmu_free_sp_rcu_callback);
> +
> + if (can_yield &&
> + (need_resched() || rwlock_needbreak(&kvm->mmu_lock))) {
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + if (shared)
> + cond_resched_rwlock_read(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> + else
> + cond_resched_rwlock_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + }
What about something like this to cut down on the duplicate code?
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index c2a9f7acf8ef..2fd010f2421e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -508,6 +508,26 @@ static void handle_changed_spte(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, gfn_t gfn,
new_spte, level);
}
+static inline bool tdp_mmu_need_resched(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ return need_resched() || rwlock_needbreak(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+}
+
+static void tdp_mmu_cond_resched(struct kvm *kvm, bool shared, bool flush)
+{
+ rcu_read_unlock()
+
+ if (flush)
+ kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+
+ if (shared)
+ cond_resched_rwlock_read(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+ else
+ cond_resched_rwlock_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+}
+
/*
* The TLBs must be flushed between the pages linked from disconnected_sps
* being removed from the paging structure and this function being called.
@@ -523,15 +543,8 @@ static void handle_disconnected_sps(struct kvm *kvm,
list_del(&sp->link);
call_rcu(&sp->rcu_head, tdp_mmu_free_sp_rcu_callback);
- if (can_yield &&
- (need_resched() || rwlock_needbreak(&kvm->mmu_lock))) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
- if (shared)
- cond_resched_rwlock_read(&kvm->mmu_lock);
- else
- cond_resched_rwlock_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
- rcu_read_lock();
- }
+ if (can_yield && tdp_mmu_need_resched(kvm))
+ tdp_mmu_cond_resched(kvm, shared, false);
}
}
@@ -724,18 +737,8 @@ static inline bool tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(struct kvm *kvm,
if (iter->next_last_level_gfn == iter->yielded_gfn)
return false;
- if (need_resched() || rwlock_needbreak(&kvm->mmu_lock)) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
-
- if (flush)
- kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
-
- if (shared)
- cond_resched_rwlock_read(&kvm->mmu_lock);
- else
- cond_resched_rwlock_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
-
- rcu_read_lock();
+ if (tdp_mmu_need_resched(kvm)) {
+ tdp_mmu_cond_resched(kvm, shared, flush);
WARN_ON(iter->gfn > iter->next_last_level_gfn);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -599,7 +610,7 @@ static inline bool tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
> */
> WRITE_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(iter->sptep), 0);
>
> - handle_disconnected_sps(kvm, &disconnected_sps);
> + handle_disconnected_sps(kvm, &disconnected_sps, false, true);
>
> return true;
> }
> @@ -817,7 +828,8 @@ static bool zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
>
> if (!list_empty(&disconnected_sps)) {
> kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
> - handle_disconnected_sps(kvm, &disconnected_sps);
> + handle_disconnected_sps(kvm, &disconnected_sps,
> + can_yield, shared);
> flush = false;
> }
>
> --
> 2.34.0.rc0.344.g81b53c2807-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-11 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-10 22:29 [RFC 00/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Optimize disabling dirty logging Ben Gardon
2021-11-10 22:29 ` [RFC 01/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix TLB flush range when handling disconnected pt Ben Gardon
2021-11-11 17:44 ` David Matlack
2021-11-10 22:29 ` [RFC 02/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Batch TLB flushes for a single zap Ben Gardon
2021-11-11 18:06 ` David Matlack
2021-11-12 23:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-10 22:29 ` [RFC 03/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor flush and free up when zapping under MMU write lock Ben Gardon
2021-11-11 18:31 ` David Matlack
2021-11-10 22:29 ` [RFC 04/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Yield while processing disconnected_sps Ben Gardon
2021-11-11 18:50 ` David Matlack [this message]
2021-11-10 22:29 ` [RFC 05/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Remove redundant flushes when disabling dirty logging Ben Gardon
2021-11-11 18:55 ` David Matlack
2021-11-10 22:29 ` [RFC 06/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Introduce vcpu_make_spte Ben Gardon
2021-11-10 22:29 ` [RFC 07/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor wrprot for nested PML out of make_spte Ben Gardon
2021-11-18 2:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-18 17:43 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-18 18:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-10 22:29 ` [RFC 08/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor mt_mask " Ben Gardon
2021-11-10 22:30 ` [RFC 09/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Remove need for a vcpu from kvm_slot_page_track_is_active Ben Gardon
2021-11-10 22:30 ` [RFC 10/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Remove need for a vcpu from mmu_try_to_unsync_pages Ben Gardon
2021-11-10 22:30 ` [RFC 11/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor shadow_zero_check out of make_spte Ben Gardon
2021-11-10 22:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-10 23:49 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-11 1:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-11 1:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-11 7:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-18 2:05 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-18 3:29 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-18 16:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-18 17:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-18 18:02 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-18 18:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-18 18:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-10 22:30 ` [RFC 12/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Replace vcpu argument with kvm pointer in make_spte Ben Gardon
2021-11-10 22:30 ` [RFC 13/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor out the meat of reset_tdp_shadow_zero_bits_mask Ben Gardon
2021-11-10 22:30 ` [RFC 14/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Propagate memslot const qualifier Ben Gardon
2021-11-10 22:30 ` [RFC 15/19] KVM: x86/MMU: Refactor vmx_get_mt_mask Ben Gardon
2021-11-10 22:30 ` [RFC 16/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor out part of vmx_get_mt_mask which does not depend on vcpu Ben Gardon
2021-11-10 22:30 ` [RFC 17/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Add try_get_mt_mask to x86_ops Ben Gardon
2021-11-10 22:30 ` [RFC 18/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Make kvm_is_mmio_pfn usable outside of spte.c Ben Gardon
2021-11-10 22:30 ` [RFC 19/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Promote pages in-place when disabling dirty logging Ben Gardon
2021-11-15 21:24 ` [RFC 00/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Optimize " Ben Gardon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YY1l8EMsQyTDAAkT@google.com \
--to=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=pshier@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com \
--cc=yulei.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=zhukeqian1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).