From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Tyler Fanelli <tfanelli@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com,
armbru@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, eblake@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sev: check which processor the ASK/ARK chain should match
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 09:30:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YbHMm9DHCoygmDma@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211116213858.363583-1-tfanelli@redhat.com>
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 04:38:59PM -0500, Tyler Fanelli wrote:
> The AMD ASK/ARK certificate chain differs between AMD SEV
> processor generations. SEV capabilities should provide
> which ASK/ARK certificate should be used based on the host
> processor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tyler Fanelli <tfanelli@redhat.com>
> ---
> qapi/misc-target.json | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> target/i386/sev.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/qapi/misc-target.json b/qapi/misc-target.json
> index 5aa2b95b7d..c64aa3ff57 100644
> --- a/qapi/misc-target.json
> +++ b/qapi/misc-target.json
> @@ -166,6 +166,24 @@
> { 'command': 'query-sev-launch-measure', 'returns': 'SevLaunchMeasureInfo',
> 'if': 'TARGET_I386' }
>
> +##
> +# @SevAskArkCertName:
> +#
> +# This enum describes which ASK/ARK certificate should be
> +# used based on the generation of an AMD Secure Encrypted
> +# Virtualization processor.
> +#
> +# @naples: AMD Naples processor (SEV 1st generation)
> +#
> +# @rome: AMD Rome processor (SEV 2nd generation)
> +#
> +# @milan: AMD Milan processor (SEV 3rd generation)
> +#
> +# Since: 7.0
I've found that many (all?) Naples machines expose 'sev_es' in
their CPU flags, which is contrary to my understanding that SEV-ES
was only introduced in Zen2 / Rome. IOW, CPU flags don't seem to
provide a viable alternative to identify the generations, so this
info reported here is useful.
> @@ -534,9 +535,19 @@ static SevCapability *sev_get_capabilities(Error **errp)
> cap->pdh = g_base64_encode(pdh_data, pdh_len);
> cap->cert_chain = g_base64_encode(cert_chain_data, cert_chain_len);
>
> - host_cpuid(0x8000001F, 0, NULL, &ebx, NULL, NULL);
> + host_cpuid(0x8000001F, 0, &eax, &ebx, NULL, NULL);
> cap->cbitpos = ebx & 0x3f;
>
> + es = eax & 0x8;
> + snp = eax & 0x10;
> + if (!es && !snp) {
> + cap->ask_ark_cert_name = SEV_ASK_ARK_CERT_NAME_NAPLES;
> + } else if (es && !snp) {
> + cap->ask_ark_cert_name = SEV_ASK_ARK_CERT_NAME_ROME;
> + } else {
> + cap->ask_ark_cert_name = SEV_ASK_ARK_CERT_NAME_MILAN;
> + }
Ident appears off here - seems to have accidentally used tabs instead
of spaces. Since that's a trivial fix, feel free to add
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
when reposting.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-09 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-16 21:38 [PATCH] sev: check which processor the ASK/ARK chain should match Tyler Fanelli
2021-12-09 9:30 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YbHMm9DHCoygmDma@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=tfanelli@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox