From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Ignat Korchagin <ignat@cloudflare.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, bgardon@google.com, dmatlack@google.com,
stevensd@chromium.org, kernel-team <kernel-team@cloudflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: Fix dangling page reference in TDP MMU
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 03:12:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YbgLoZjy1zuhIgK7@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YbeiiT9b350lYBiR@google.com>
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021, Ignat Korchagin wrote:
> > > Unfortunately, this patchset does not fix the original issue reported in [1].
> >
> > Can you provide your kernel config? And any other version/config info that might
> > be relevant, e.g. anything in gvisor or runsc?
>
> Scratch that, I've reproduced this, with luck I'll have a root cause by end of day.
Ok, the root cause is comically simple compared to all the theories we came up with.
If tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() drops mmu_lock and restarts the iterator, the
"continue" in the caller triggers tdp_iter_next(). tdp_iter_next() does what it's
told and advances the iterator. Because all users call tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched()
at the very beginning of the loop, this has the effect of skipping the current SPTE.
E.g. in the "zap all" case, where iter->level == iter->min_level == iter->root_level,
we effectively end up with code like this, which is obviously wrong once the
complexity of traversing a tree is simplified down to walking an array of SPTEs.
gfn_t end = tdp_mmu_max_gfn_host();
gfn_t start = 0;
gfn_t last;
for (i = last = start; i < end; i += 8, last = i) {
if (cond_resched()) {
i = last;
continue;
}
sp = &root->spt[i];
zap(sp);
}
Patch incoming...
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-14 3:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-13 11:25 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: Fix dangling page reference in TDP MMU Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-13 11:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: allow kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_invalidated_roots with write-locked mmu_lock Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-13 11:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: zap invalid roots in kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-13 16:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-14 19:45 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-13 13:43 ` [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: Fix dangling page reference in TDP MMU Ignat Korchagin
2021-12-13 15:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-13 16:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-13 18:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-13 19:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-13 20:18 ` Ignat Korchagin
2021-12-14 3:12 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YbgLoZjy1zuhIgK7@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=ignat@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=stevensd@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox