From: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] KVM: arm64: Correctly treat writes to OSLSR_EL1 as undefined
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 13:09:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YbnpCFBPNgmkEXjf@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YbnUDny3GSNpyabJ@FVFF77S0Q05N>
Hi Mark,
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 11:39:58AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 05:28:07PM +0000, Oliver Upton wrote:
> > Any valid implementation of the architecture should generate an
> > undefined exception for writes to a read-only register, such as
> > OSLSR_EL1. Nonetheless, the KVM handler actually implements write-ignore
> > behavior.
> >
> > Align the trap handler for OSLSR_EL1 with hardware behavior. If such a
> > write ever traps to EL2, inject an undef into the guest and print a
> > warning.
>
> I think this can still be read amibguously, since we don't explicitly state
> that writes to OSLSR_EL1 should never trap (and the implications of being
> UNDEFINED are subtle). How about:
>
> | Writes to OSLSR_EL1 are UNDEFINED and should never trap from EL1 to EL2, but
> | the KVM trap handler for OSLSR_EL1 handlees writes via ignore_write(). This
> | is confusing to readers of the code, but shouldn't have any functional impact.
> |
> | For clarity, use write_to_read_only() rather than ignore_write(). If a trap
> | is unexpectedly taken to EL2 in violation of the architecture, this will
> | WARN_ONCE() and inject an undef into the guest.
Agreed, I like your suggested changelog better :-)
> With that:
>
> Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Thanks!
--
Best,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-15 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-14 17:28 [PATCH v4 0/6] KVM: arm64: Emulate the OS Lock Oliver Upton
2021-12-14 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] KVM: arm64: Correctly treat writes to OSLSR_EL1 as undefined Oliver Upton
2021-12-15 11:39 ` Mark Rutland
2021-12-15 13:09 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2021-12-15 14:32 ` Mark Rutland
2021-12-14 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] KVM: arm64: Stash OSLSR_EL1 in the cpu context Oliver Upton
2021-12-15 11:57 ` Mark Rutland
2021-12-14 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] KVM: arm64: Allow guest to set the OSLK bit Oliver Upton
2021-12-15 12:15 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-03 17:37 ` Oliver Upton
2021-12-14 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] KVM: arm64: Emulate the OS Lock Oliver Upton
2021-12-14 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] selftests: KVM: Add OSLSR_EL1 to the list of blessed regs Oliver Upton
2021-12-14 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] selftests: KVM: Test OS lock behavior Oliver Upton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YbnpCFBPNgmkEXjf@google.com \
--to=oupton@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=pshier@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox