From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap invalid TDP MMU roots when unmapping
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 20:41:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YbpS5UZdC/a5PgoO@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b4295e77-aaf1-f0f5-cfd5-2a4fda923fb4@redhat.com>
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 12/15/21 02:15, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Patches 01-03 implement a bug fix by ensuring KVM zaps both valid and
> > invalid roots when unmapping a gfn range (including the magic "all" range).
> > Failure to zap invalid roots means KVM doesn't honor the mmu_notifier's
> > requirement that all references are dropped.
> >
> > set_nx_huge_pages() is the most blatant offender, as it doesn't elevate
> > mm_users and so a VM's entire mm can be released, but the same underlying
> > bug exists for any "unmap" command from the mmu_notifier in combination
> > with a memslot update. E.g. if KVM is deleting a memslot, and a
> > mmu_notifier hook acquires mmu_lock while it's dropped by
> > kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast(), the mmu_notifier hook will see the to-be-deleted
> > memslot but won't zap entries from the invalid roots.
> >
> > Patch 04 is cleanup to reuse the common iterator for walking _only_
> > invalid roots.
> >
> > Sean Christopherson (4):
> > KVM: x86/mmu: Use common TDP MMU zap helper for MMU notifier unmap
> > hook
> > KVM: x86/mmu: Move "invalid" check out of kvm_tdp_mmu_get_root()
> > KVM: x86/mmu: Zap _all_ roots when unmapping gfn range in TDP MMU
> > KVM: x86/mmu: Use common iterator for walking invalid TDP MMU roots
> >
> > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++--------------------
> > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h | 3 -
> > 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Queued 1-3 for 5.16 and 4 for 5.17.
Actually, can you please unqueue patch 4? I think we can actually kill off
kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_invalidated_roots() entirely. I don't know if that code will be
ready for 5.17, but if it is then this patch is unnecesary. And if not, it
shouldn't be difficult to re-queue this a bit later.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-15 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-15 1:15 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap invalid TDP MMU roots when unmapping Sean Christopherson
2021-12-15 1:15 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Use common TDP MMU zap helper for MMU notifier unmap hook Sean Christopherson
2021-12-15 1:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Move "invalid" check out of kvm_tdp_mmu_get_root() Sean Christopherson
2021-12-15 1:15 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap _all_ roots when unmapping gfn range in TDP MMU Sean Christopherson
2021-12-15 1:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Use common iterator for walking invalid TDP MMU roots Sean Christopherson
2021-12-15 17:20 ` [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap invalid TDP MMU roots when unmapping Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-15 20:41 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2021-12-16 0:44 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YbpS5UZdC/a5PgoO@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox