From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/6] KVM: X86: Use level_promoted and pae_root shadow page for 32bit guests
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 20:55:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YdS0J1mmpYmD4KcL@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211210092508.7185-7-jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
> index 476b133544dd..822ff5d76b91 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
> @@ -100,13 +100,8 @@ static inline bool is_tdp_mmu(struct kvm_mmu *mmu)
> if (WARN_ON(!VALID_PAGE(hpa)))
> return false;
>
> - /*
> - * A NULL shadow page is legal when shadowing a non-paging guest with
> - * PAE paging, as the MMU will be direct with root_hpa pointing at the
> - * pae_root page, not a shadow page.
> - */
> sp = to_shadow_page(hpa);
> - return sp && is_tdp_mmu_page(sp) && sp->root_count;
> + return is_tdp_mmu_page(sp) && sp->root_count;
> }
is_page_fault_stale() can get similar treatment
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index e8c69c2dfbd9..9ff8e228b55e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -3855,19 +3855,7 @@ static bool is_page_fault_stale(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
{
struct kvm_mmu_page *sp = to_shadow_page(vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa);
- /* Special roots, e.g. pae_root, are not backed by shadow pages. */
- if (sp && is_obsolete_sp(vcpu->kvm, sp))
- return true;
-
- /*
- * Roots without an associated shadow page are considered invalid if
- * there is a pending request to free obsolete roots. The request is
- * only a hint that the current root _may_ be obsolete and needs to be
- * reloaded, e.g. if the guest frees a PGD that KVM is tracking as a
- * previous root, then __kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page() signals all vCPUs
- * to reload even if no vCPU is actively using the root.
- */
- if (!sp && kvm_test_request(KVM_REQ_MMU_RELOAD, vcpu))
+ if (is_obsolete_sp(vcpu->kvm, sp))
return true;
return fault->slot &&
> #else
> static inline bool kvm_mmu_init_tdp_mmu(struct kvm *kvm) { return false; }
> --
> 2.19.1.6.gb485710b
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-04 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-10 9:25 [RFC PATCH 0/6] KVM: X86: Add and use shadow page with level promoted or acting as pae_root Lai Jiangshan
2021-12-10 9:25 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] KVM: X86: Check root_level only in fast_pgd_switch() Lai Jiangshan
2022-01-04 20:24 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-10 9:25 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] KVM: X86: Walk shadow page starting with shadow_root_level Lai Jiangshan
2022-01-04 20:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-04 20:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-04 20:43 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-10 9:25 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] KVM: X86: Add arguement gfn and role to kvm_mmu_alloc_page() Lai Jiangshan
2022-01-04 20:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-10 9:25 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] KVM: X86: Introduce role.level_promoted Lai Jiangshan
2022-01-04 22:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-11 16:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-10 9:25 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] KVM: X86: Alloc pae_root shadow page Lai Jiangshan
2022-01-04 21:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-05 3:11 ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-01-05 16:45 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-06 2:01 ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-01-06 19:41 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-07 4:36 ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-12-10 9:25 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] KVM: X86: Use level_promoted and pae_root shadow page for 32bit guests Lai Jiangshan
2022-01-04 20:55 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2021-12-10 10:27 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] KVM: X86: Add and use shadow page with level promoted or acting as pae_root Maxim Levitsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YdS0J1mmpYmD4KcL@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=laijs@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).