From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<x86@kernel.org>, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: SVM: allow to force AVIC to be enabled
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 22:25:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YdTJPTSsM1feVwt/@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211213104634.199141-3-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> Apparently on some systems AVIC is disabled in CPUID but still usable.
>
> Allow the user to override the CPUID if the user is willing to
> take the risk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index c9668a3b51011..468cc385c35f0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -206,6 +206,9 @@ module_param(tsc_scaling, int, 0444);
> static bool avic;
> module_param(avic, bool, 0444);
>
> +static bool force_avic;
> +module_param_unsafe(force_avic, bool, 0444);
> +
> bool __read_mostly dump_invalid_vmcb;
> module_param(dump_invalid_vmcb, bool, 0644);
>
> @@ -4656,10 +4659,14 @@ static __init int svm_hardware_setup(void)
> nrips = false;
> }
>
> - enable_apicv = avic = avic && npt_enabled && boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AVIC);
> + enable_apicv = avic = avic && npt_enabled && (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AVIC) || force_avic);
>
> if (enable_apicv) {
> - pr_info("AVIC enabled\n");
> + if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AVIC)) {
> + pr_warn("AVIC is not supported in CPUID but force enabled");
> + pr_warn("Your system might crash and burn");
> + } else
Needs curly braces, though arguably the "AVIC enabled" part should be printed
regardless of boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AVIC).
> + pr_info("AVIC enabled\n");
This is all more than a bit terrifying, though I can see the usefuless for a
developer. At the very least, this should taint the kernel. This should also
probably be buried behind a Kconfig that is itself buried behind EXPERT.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-04 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-13 10:46 [PATCH v2 0/5] RFC: KVM: SVM: Allow L1's AVIC to co-exist with nesting Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-13 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] KVM: nSVM: deal with L1 hypervisor that intercepts interrupts but lets L2 control EFLAGS.IF Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-13 11:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-13 13:07 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-13 13:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-13 13:29 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-13 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: SVM: allow to force AVIC to be enabled Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-04 22:25 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-01-05 10:54 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-05 17:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-13 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: SVM: fix race between interrupt delivery and AVIC inhibition Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-04 22:52 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-05 11:03 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-05 11:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-05 12:15 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-07 15:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-07 23:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-10 15:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-13 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: x86: don't touch irr_pending in kvm_apic_update_apicv when inhibiting it Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-04 22:57 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-05 10:56 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-13 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: SVM: allow AVIC to co-exist with a nested guest running Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-05 21:56 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-06 8:44 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-06 17:41 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YdTJPTSsM1feVwt/@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).