kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Nathan Tempelman <natet@google.com>,
	Marc Orr <marcorr@google.com>,
	Steve Rutherford <srutherford@google.com>,
	Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Varad Gautam <varad.gautam@suse.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
	Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] KVM: selftests: Add support for test-selectable ucall implementations
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 19:40:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YdX0SRoBXReggrVA@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220105191107.qx67wf2coc3q6giu@amd.com>

On Wed, Jan 05, 2022, Michael Roth wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 05:43:21PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Because it uses multiple VMs, and my rough sketch only allows for a single VM to
> > use ucall.  Though I suppose we could simply keep appending to the ucall list for
> > every VM.  The requirement would then be that all VMs are of the same type, i.e.
> > utilize the same ucall_ops.
> 
> Hmm, maybe I misread your patch. Not supporting multiple VMs was the
> reason I gave up on having the ucall structs allocated on-demand and
> went with requiring them to be passed as arguments to ucall().
> 
> I thought with your patch you had solved that by having each vm have it's
> own pool, via vm->ucall_list, and then mapping each pool into each guest
> separately via:
> 
>   ucall_init(vm):
>     ucall_list = vm->ucall_list
>     sync_global_to_guest(ucall_list).
> 
> then as long as that ucall_init() is done *after* the guest calls
> kvm_vm_elf_load(), it will end up with a 'ucall_list' global that points
> to it's own specific vm->ucall_list. Then on the test side it doesn't
> matter what the 'ucall_list' global is currently set to since you have
> the GPA and know what vm exited.
> 
> Or am I missing something there?

Ha, that was not at all intented.  But yes, it should work.  I'd rather be lucky
than good?

> Although even if that is the case, now that we're proposing doing the
> ucall_init() inside vm_create(), then we run the risk of a test calling
> kvm_vm_elf_load() after, which might clobber the guest's copy of
> ucall_list global if ucall_init() had since been called for another VM.
> But that could maybe be worked around by having whatever vm_create()
> variant we use also do the kvm_vm_elf_load() unconditionally as part of
> creation.

Will sync_global_to_guest() even work as intended if kvm_vm_elf_load() hasn't
been called?  If not, then sync_global_{to,from}_guest() should really assert if
the test hasn't been loaded.

As for ucall_init(), I think the best approach would be to make kvm_vm_elf_load()
a static and replace all calls with:

	kvm_vm_load_guest(vm);

where its implementation is:

  void kvm_vm_load_guest(struct kvm_vm *vm)
  {
  	kvm_vm_elf_load(vm, program_invocation_name);

	ucall_init(vm);
  }

The logic being that if a test creates a VM but never loads any code into the guest,
e.g. kvm_create_max_vcpus, then it _can't_ make ucalls.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-05 19:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-10 16:46 [RFC PATCH 00/10] KVM: selftests: Add support for test-selectable ucall implementations Michael Roth
2021-12-10 16:46 ` [PATCH RFC 01/10] kvm: selftests: move base kvm_util.h declarations to kvm_util_base.h Michael Roth
2021-12-10 16:46 ` [PATCH RFC 02/10] kvm: selftests: move ucall declarations into ucall_common.h Michael Roth
2021-12-25  9:11   ` Andrew Jones
2021-12-10 16:46 ` [PATCH RFC 03/10] kvm: selftests: introduce ucall_ops for test/arch-specific ucall implementations Michael Roth
2021-12-10 16:46 ` [PATCH RFC 04/10] kvm: arm64: selftests: use ucall_ops to define default ucall implementation Michael Roth
2021-12-10 16:46 ` [PATCH RFC 05/10] kvm: s390: " Michael Roth
2021-12-10 16:46 ` [PATCH RFC 06/10] kvm: selftests: add ucall interfaces based around shared memory Michael Roth
2021-12-10 16:46 ` [PATCH RFC 07/10] kvm: selftests: add ucall_shared ops for PIO Michael Roth
2021-12-10 16:46 ` [PATCH RFC 08/10] kvm: selftests: introduce ucall implementation based on halt instructions Michael Roth
2021-12-10 16:46 ` [PATCH RFC 09/10] kvm: selftests: add GUEST_SHARED_* macros for shared ucall implementations Michael Roth
2021-12-10 16:46 ` [PATCH RFC 10/10] kvm: selftests: add ucall_test to test various ucall functionality Michael Roth
2021-12-22 14:46 ` [RFC PATCH 00/10] KVM: selftests: Add support for test-selectable ucall implementations Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-30 21:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-04 23:35   ` Michael Roth
2022-01-05  0:17     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-05 17:02       ` Michael Roth
2022-01-05 17:43         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-05 19:11           ` Michael Roth
2022-01-05 19:40             ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-01-05 21:35               ` Michael Roth
2022-01-05 22:02                 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-05 22:32                   ` Michael Roth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YdX0SRoBXReggrVA@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcorr@google.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mizhang@google.com \
    --cc=natet@google.com \
    --cc=ricarkol@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=srutherford@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=varad.gautam@suse.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).