From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Junaid Shahid <junaids@google.com>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
Harish Barathvajasankar <hbarath@google.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
"Nikunj A . Dadhania" <nikunj@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 04/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor out logic to atomically install a new page table
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 20:12:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YddNIMWaARotqOSZ@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211213225918.672507-5-dmatlack@google.com>
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021, David Matlack wrote:
> Factor out the logic to atomically replace an SPTE with an SPTE that
> points to a new page table. This will be used in a follow-up commit to
> split a large page SPTE into one level lower.
>
> Opportunistically drop the kvm_mmu_get_page tracepoint in
> kvm_tdp_mmu_map() since it is redundant with the identical tracepoint in
> alloc_tdp_mmu_page().
>
> Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> index 656ebf5b20dc..dbd07c10d11a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> @@ -950,6 +950,36 @@ static int tdp_mmu_map_handle_target_level(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * tdp_mmu_install_sp_atomic - Atomically replace the given spte with an
> + * spte pointing to the provided page table.
> + *
> + * @kvm: kvm instance
> + * @iter: a tdp_iter instance currently on the SPTE that should be set
> + * @sp: The new TDP page table to install.
> + * @account_nx: True if this page table is being installed to split a
> + * non-executable huge page.
> + *
> + * Returns: True if the new page table was installed. False if spte being
> + * replaced changed, causing the atomic compare-exchange to fail.
I'd prefer to return an int with 0/-EBUSY on success/fail. Ditto for the existing
tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(). Actually, if you add a prep patch to make that happen,
then this can be:
u64 spte = make_nonleaf_spte(sp->spt, !shadow_accessed_mask);
int ret;
ret = tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(kvm, iter, spte);
if (ret)
return ret;
tdp_mmu_link_page(kvm, sp, account_nx);
return 0;
> + * If this function returns false the sp will be freed before
> + * returning.
Uh, no it's not? The call to tdp_mmu_free_sp() is still done by kvm_tdp_mmu_map().
> + */
> +static bool tdp_mmu_install_sp_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
Hmm, so this helper is the only user of tdp_mmu_link_page(), and _that_ helper
is rather tiny. And this would also be a good opportunity to clean up the
"(un)link_page" verbiage, as the bare "page" doesn't communicate to the reader
that it's for linking shadow pages, e.g. not struct page.
So, what about folding in tdp_mmu_link_page(), naming this helper either
tdp_mmu_link_sp_atomic() or tdp_mmu_link_shadow_page_atomic(), and then renaming
tdp_mmu_unlink_page() accordingly? And for bonus points, add a blurb in the
function comment like:
* Note the lack of a non-atomic variant! The TDP MMU always builds its
* page tables while holding mmu_lock for read.
> + struct tdp_iter *iter,
> + struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
> + bool account_nx)
> +{
> + u64 spte = make_nonleaf_spte(sp->spt, !shadow_accessed_mask);
> +
> + if (!tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(kvm, iter, spte))
> + return false;
> +
> + tdp_mmu_link_page(kvm, sp, account_nx);
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Handle a TDP page fault (NPT/EPT violation/misconfiguration) by installing
> * page tables and SPTEs to translate the faulting guest physical address.
> @@ -959,8 +989,6 @@ int kvm_tdp_mmu_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
> struct kvm_mmu *mmu = vcpu->arch.mmu;
> struct tdp_iter iter;
> struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
> - u64 *child_pt;
> - u64 new_spte;
> int ret;
>
> kvm_mmu_hugepage_adjust(vcpu, fault);
> @@ -996,6 +1024,9 @@ int kvm_tdp_mmu_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
> }
>
> if (!is_shadow_present_pte(iter.old_spte)) {
> + bool account_nx = fault->huge_page_disallowed &&
> + fault->req_level >= iter.level;
> +
> /*
> * If SPTE has been frozen by another thread, just
> * give up and retry, avoiding unnecessary page table
> @@ -1005,18 +1036,7 @@ int kvm_tdp_mmu_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
> break;
>
> sp = alloc_tdp_mmu_page(vcpu, iter.gfn, iter.level - 1);
> - child_pt = sp->spt;
> -
> - new_spte = make_nonleaf_spte(child_pt,
> - !shadow_accessed_mask);
> -
> - if (tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(vcpu->kvm, &iter, new_spte)) {
> - tdp_mmu_link_page(vcpu->kvm, sp,
> - fault->huge_page_disallowed &&
> - fault->req_level >= iter.level);
> -
> - trace_kvm_mmu_get_page(sp, true);
> - } else {
> + if (!tdp_mmu_install_sp_atomic(vcpu->kvm, &iter, sp, account_nx)) {
> tdp_mmu_free_sp(sp);
> break;
> }
> --
> 2.34.1.173.g76aa8bc2d0-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-06 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-13 22:59 [PATCH v1 00/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Eager Page Splitting for the TDP MMU David Matlack
2021-12-13 22:59 ` [PATCH v1 01/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename rmap_write_protect to kvm_vcpu_write_protect_gfn David Matlack
2022-01-06 0:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-13 22:59 ` [PATCH v1 02/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename __rmap_write_protect to rmap_write_protect David Matlack
2022-01-06 0:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-13 22:59 ` [PATCH v1 03/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Automatically update iter->old_spte if cmpxchg fails David Matlack
2022-01-04 10:13 ` Peter Xu
2022-01-04 17:29 ` Ben Gardon
2022-01-06 0:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-06 18:04 ` David Matlack
2021-12-13 22:59 ` [PATCH v1 04/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor out logic to atomically install a new page table David Matlack
2022-01-04 10:32 ` Peter Xu
2022-01-04 18:26 ` David Matlack
2022-01-05 1:00 ` Peter Xu
2022-01-06 20:12 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-01-06 22:56 ` David Matlack
2022-01-07 18:24 ` David Matlack
2022-01-07 21:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-13 22:59 ` [PATCH v1 05/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Move restore_acc_track_spte to spte.c David Matlack
2022-01-04 10:33 ` Peter Xu
2022-01-06 20:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-06 22:58 ` David Matlack
2021-12-13 22:59 ` [PATCH v1 06/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Refactor tdp_mmu iterators to take kvm_mmu_page root David Matlack
2022-01-04 10:35 ` Peter Xu
2022-01-06 20:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-06 22:57 ` David Matlack
2021-12-13 22:59 ` [PATCH v1 07/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Derive page role from parent David Matlack
2022-01-05 7:51 ` Peter Xu
2022-01-06 20:45 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-06 23:00 ` David Matlack
2021-12-13 22:59 ` [PATCH v1 08/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Refactor TDP MMU child page initialization David Matlack
2022-01-05 7:51 ` Peter Xu
2022-01-06 20:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-06 22:08 ` David Matlack
2022-01-06 23:02 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-13 22:59 ` [PATCH v1 09/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Split huge pages when dirty logging is enabled David Matlack
2022-01-05 7:54 ` Peter Xu
2022-01-05 17:49 ` David Matlack
2022-01-06 22:48 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-06 21:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-06 22:20 ` David Matlack
2022-01-06 22:56 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-07 2:02 ` Peter Xu
2022-01-07 2:06 ` Peter Xu
2021-12-13 22:59 ` [PATCH v1 10/13] KVM: Push MMU locking down into kvm_arch_mmu_enable_log_dirty_pt_masked David Matlack
2021-12-13 22:59 ` [PATCH v1 11/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Split huge pages during CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG David Matlack
2022-01-05 9:02 ` Peter Xu
2022-01-05 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-01-05 17:57 ` David Matlack
2021-12-13 22:59 ` [PATCH v1 12/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Add tracepoint for splitting huge pages David Matlack
2022-01-05 8:38 ` Peter Xu
2022-01-06 23:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-07 0:54 ` David Matlack
2021-12-13 22:59 ` [PATCH v1 13/13] KVM: selftests: Add an option to disable MANUAL_PROTECT_ENABLE and INITIALLY_SET David Matlack
2022-01-05 8:38 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YddNIMWaARotqOSZ@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=hbarath@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=junaids@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikunj@amd.com \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=pshier@google.com \
--cc=scgl@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).