kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 01/11] KVM: Capture VM start
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 01:06:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ydjje8qBOP3zDOZi@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220104194918.373612-2-rananta@google.com>

On Tue, Jan 04, 2022, Raghavendra Rao Ananta wrote:
> Capture the start of the KVM VM, which is basically the

Please wrap at ~75 chars.

> start of any vCPU run. This state of the VM is helpful
> in the upcoming patches to prevent user-space from
> configuring certain VM features after the VM has started
> running.

Please provide context of how the flag will be used.  I glanced at the future
patches, and knowing very little about arm, I was unable to glean useful info
about exactly who is being prevented from doing what.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/kvm_host.h | 3 +++
>  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c      | 9 +++++++++
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index c310648cc8f1..d0bd8f7a026c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -623,6 +623,7 @@ struct kvm {
>  	struct notifier_block pm_notifier;
>  #endif
>  	char stats_id[KVM_STATS_NAME_SIZE];
> +	bool vm_started;
>  };
>  
>  #define kvm_err(fmt, ...) \
> @@ -1666,6 +1667,8 @@ static inline bool kvm_check_request(int req, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +#define kvm_vm_has_started(kvm) (kvm->vm_started)

Needs parantheses around (kvm), but why bother with a macro?  This is the same
header that defines struct kvm.

> +
>  extern bool kvm_rebooting;
>  
>  extern unsigned int halt_poll_ns;
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 72c4e6b39389..962b91ac2064 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -3686,6 +3686,7 @@ static long kvm_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp,
>  	int r;
>  	struct kvm_fpu *fpu = NULL;
>  	struct kvm_sregs *kvm_sregs = NULL;
> +	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;

If you're going to bother grabbing kvm, replace the instances below that also do
vcpu->kvm.

>  
>  	if (vcpu->kvm->mm != current->mm || vcpu->kvm->vm_dead)
>  		return -EIO;
> @@ -3723,6 +3724,14 @@ static long kvm_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp,
>  			if (oldpid)
>  				synchronize_rcu();
>  			put_pid(oldpid);
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * Since we land here even on the first vCPU run,
> +			 * we can mark that the VM has started running.

Please avoid "we", "us", etc..

"vm_started" is also ambiguous.  If we end up with a flag, then I would prefer a
much more literal name, a la created_vcpus, e.g. ran_vcpus or something.

> +			 */
> +			mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);

This adds unnecessary lock contention when running vCPUs.  The naive solution
would be:
			if (!kvm->vm_started) {
				...
			}

> +			kvm->vm_started = true;
> +			mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);

Lastly, why is this in generic KVM?

>  		}
>  		r = kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(vcpu);
>  		trace_kvm_userspace_exit(vcpu->run->exit_reason, r);
> -- 
> 2.34.1.448.ga2b2bfdf31-goog
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kvmarm mailing list
> kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-08  1:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-04 19:49 [RFC PATCH v3 00/11] KVM: arm64: Add support for hypercall services selection Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2022-01-04 19:49 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/11] KVM: Capture VM start Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2022-01-07  6:06   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-07 23:43     ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2022-01-08  0:04       ` Jim Mattson
2022-01-10 23:07         ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2022-01-10 23:57           ` Jim Mattson
2022-01-11 18:52             ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2022-01-11 19:16               ` Jim Mattson
2022-01-12 18:29                 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2022-01-13 17:21                   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-14  0:42                     ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2022-01-14  1:10                       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-14 21:51                     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-18 22:54                       ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2022-01-19  0:07                       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-19  7:47                         ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-20  0:27                           ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-20 19:16                             ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2022-01-25 15:15                         ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-25 15:10                     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-11  0:03       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-11 18:54         ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2022-01-08  1:06   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-01-10 23:23     ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2022-01-11 17:36       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-11 18:46         ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2022-01-11 19:04           ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-12 18:08             ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2022-01-12 18:24               ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-12 18:31                 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-04 19:49 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/11] KVM: arm64: Factor out firmware register handling from psci.c Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2022-01-04 19:49 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/11] KVM: Introduce KVM_CAP_ARM_HVC_FW_REG_BMAP Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2022-01-08  5:40   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-10 23:40     ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2022-01-11  4:33       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-04 19:49 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/11] KVM: arm64: Setup a framework for hypercall bitmap firmware registers Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2022-01-10  6:28   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-11  0:50     ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2022-01-12  5:11       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-12 18:02         ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2022-01-14  6:23           ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-19  6:42   ` Jason Wang
2022-01-19 10:21     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-04 19:49 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/11] KVM: arm64: Add standard hypervisor firmware register Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2022-01-04 19:49 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/11] KVM: arm64: Add vendor " Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2022-01-04 19:49 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/11] Docs: KVM: Add doc for the bitmap firmware registers Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2022-01-04 19:49 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/11] Docs: KVM: Rename psci.rst to hypercalls.rst Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2022-01-04 19:49 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/11] tools: Import ARM SMCCC definitions Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2022-01-04 19:49 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/11] selftests: KVM: aarch64: Introduce hypercall ABI test Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2022-01-04 19:49 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/11] selftests: KVM: aarch64: Add the bitmap firmware registers to get-reg-list Raghavendra Rao Ananta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Ydjje8qBOP3zDOZi@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pshier@google.com \
    --cc=rananta@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).