From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 331F4C433EF for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 00:34:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344015AbiASAe2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:34:28 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54382 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1343698AbiASAe2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:34:28 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x1031.google.com (mail-pj1-x1031.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1031]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1818AC06161C for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 16:34:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1031.google.com with SMTP id n16-20020a17090a091000b001b46196d572so907522pjn.5 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 16:34:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=fhtsshb779foHbUp9uRUsqpWENAGkHqJ8VEZb1EuPfo=; b=cts+MA9AHHlyk9r+XBHTWM5nizuHm/1LTrjv907OodM2rP0bLUgF5TK5lIOAzVMUj1 HLVENadItvTm+SBpER3uaCQow8rmnlyfjxa0twynqbwUdgYG4VrBrmFTD8WeT6Xjj8j6 XWKN8YaFVAVY4z7kiQ3GKu3vC6oGB6krTdjpTRN1FzH2kZXit0Fc1xV0j6SDZJ6yuUPD 3RbMsb+P2OeNN2TNvsEtX03QC17a8E5xriYNXIDcRWsZBEX7ux8KHekB9cEH0kiOLQP1 tliQRaxGJiRzHqTsBDBMnBZL6q/Oq4iDSe0ObdfUe/6WWIxbL+9dRew7xxQtXnVXpM+N vdCw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=fhtsshb779foHbUp9uRUsqpWENAGkHqJ8VEZb1EuPfo=; b=TukkODGAkHku3R2z2INMDfVAsMTXeP7l5m45vDOsGw0n/DyTq9yXpjEeZnhiUAcf6o nI+byjO2D3+0gDSc0BMT6O/DFci0vxE3twX4aYU9m2GK//+jB8kSiIKf70j7C+eOJp94 OMs/xJOi6cfJ8HXlO4zU87AjD8JQkrLSZyOjTJJicahzK6NO2j4yPhofw6TJ6KglNz7d cR8+IRxB0VJ0x06QG29Wp9WQhBkG1him4k6NXvvONANaYQJq7i/roVJ9azPpN35qGfQZ n/vRprQ/VIg4cEXe9Zdzl2iIT2EgG1fpSgHVW9yF4Pd03jdMo33HpLdGzJNEla9A3u+o V8+g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531J13bDUnKUfu5SPTegJECd5fnHRYSBakMbqvrg1GSnrOvt1Yz+ 9ljvAaEs2H/BAr+vg168Qfy/dA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwzCq8jLEnOzlYAwNNMmWDUPgFImKOrZBeA6SdytoLo6ELVLP75EnatTaR9PDXpvl3+Xr8fRg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b189:b0:143:8079:3d3b with SMTP id s9-20020a170902b18900b0014380793d3bmr30164103plr.71.1642552467215; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 16:34:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com (157.214.185.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.185.214.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a20sm9680713pfv.122.2022.01.18.16.34.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 18 Jan 2022 16:34:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 00:34:22 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Chao Gao Cc: "Tian, Kevin" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "pbonzini@redhat.com" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , "x86@kernel.org" , "H. Peter Anvin" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] KVM: x86: Remove WARN_ON in kvm_arch_check_processor_compat Message-ID: References: <20211227081515.2088920-1-chao.gao@intel.com> <20211227081515.2088920-6-chao.gao@intel.com> <20220112110000.GA10249@gao-cwp> <20220117133503.GA27833@gao-cwp> <20220117134608.GA30004@gao-cwp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220117134608.GA30004@gao-cwp> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 17, 2022, Chao Gao wrote: > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 09:35:04PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote: > >OK. How about: > > > > /* > > * Compatibility checks are done when loading KVM or in KVM's CPU > > * hotplug callback. It ensures all online CPUs are compatible before > > * running any vCPUs. For other cases, compatibility checks are > > * unnecessary or even problematic. Try to detect improper usages here. > > */ > > WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled() && !cpu_active(smp_processor_id())); > > Sorry. It should be: > WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled() && cpu_active(smp_processor_id())); Nice! That's exactly what I was hoping we could do.