public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH]  kvm/vmx: Make setup/unsetup under the same conditions
@ 2022-02-18 11:11 Peng Hao
  2022-02-18 16:17 ` Sean Christopherson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Peng Hao @ 2022-02-18 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pbonzini; +Cc: kvm, linux-kernel

Make sure nested_vmx_hardware_setup/unsetup are called in pairs under
the same conditions.

Signed-off-by: Peng Hao <flyingpeng@tencent.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 0ffcfe54eea5..5392def71093 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -7852,7 +7852,7 @@ static __init int hardware_setup(void)
 	vmx_set_cpu_caps();
 
 	r = alloc_kvm_area();
-	if (r)
+	if (r && nested)
 		nested_vmx_hardware_unsetup();
 
 	kvm_set_posted_intr_wakeup_handler(pi_wakeup_handler);
-- 
2.27.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH]  kvm/vmx: Make setup/unsetup under the same conditions
  2022-02-18 11:11 [PATCH] kvm/vmx: Make setup/unsetup under the same conditions Peng Hao
@ 2022-02-18 16:17 ` Sean Christopherson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sean Christopherson @ 2022-02-18 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peng Hao; +Cc: pbonzini, kvm, linux-kernel

"KVM: VMX" for the scope, or maybe even "KVM: nVMX:" despite this not touching
vmx/nested.c.  Either way (but not "kvm/vmx:").

On Fri, Feb 18, 2022, Peng Hao wrote:
> Make sure nested_vmx_hardware_setup/unsetup are called in pairs under
> the same conditions.

Probably worth adding a sentence to clarify that the existing code isn't buggy
only because free_page() plays nice with getting passed '0' and vmx_bitmap is
initialized to zero.  Something like:

  Make sure nested_vmx_hardware_setup/unsetup() are called in pairs under
  the same conditions.  Calling nested_vmx_hardware_unsetup() when nested
  is false "works" right now because it only calls free_page() on zero-
  initialized pointers, but it's possible that more code will be added to
  nested_vmx_hardware_unsetup() in the future.

Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>


> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Hao <flyingpeng@tencent.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 0ffcfe54eea5..5392def71093 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -7852,7 +7852,7 @@ static __init int hardware_setup(void)
>  	vmx_set_cpu_caps();
>  
>  	r = alloc_kvm_area();
> -	if (r)
> +	if (r && nested)
>  		nested_vmx_hardware_unsetup();
>  
>  	kvm_set_posted_intr_wakeup_handler(pi_wakeup_handler);
> -- 
> 2.27.0
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-18 16:17 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-02-18 11:11 [PATCH] kvm/vmx: Make setup/unsetup under the same conditions Peng Hao
2022-02-18 16:17 ` Sean Christopherson

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox