From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: x86: allow defining return-0 static calls
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 16:29:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yg/JZZ+i67HDKCVK@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220217180831.288210-7-pbonzini@redhat.com>
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> A few vendor callbacks are only used by VMX, but they return an integer
> or bool value. Introduce KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL_RET0 for them: if a func is
> NULL in struct kvm_x86_ops, it will be changed to __static_call_return0
> when updating static calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h | 15 +++++++++------
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 ++++
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c | 5 -----
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 20 --------------------
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2 +-
> kernel/static_call.c | 1 +
> 6 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h
> index c0ec066a8599..29affccb353c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h
> @@ -10,7 +10,9 @@ BUILD_BUG_ON(1)
> *
> * KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL() can be used for those functions that can have
> * a NULL definition, for example if "static_call_cond()" will be used
> - * at the call sites.
> + * at the call sites. KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL_RET0() can be used likewise
> + * to make a definition optional, but in this case the default will
> + * be __static_call_return0.
__static_call_return0()
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index ab1c4778824a..d3da64106685 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops kvm_x86_ops __read_mostly;
> DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_NULL(kvm_x86_##func, \
> *(((struct kvm_x86_ops *)0)->func));
> #define KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL KVM_X86_OP
> +#define KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL_RET0 KVM_X86_OP
> #include <asm/kvm-x86-ops.h>
> EXPORT_STATIC_CALL_GPL(kvm_x86_get_cs_db_l_bits);
> EXPORT_STATIC_CALL_GPL(kvm_x86_cache_reg);
> @@ -12016,7 +12017,6 @@ void kvm_arch_flush_shadow_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
> static inline bool kvm_guest_apic_has_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> return (is_guest_mode(vcpu) &&
> - kvm_x86_ops.guest_apic_has_interrupt &&
> static_call(kvm_x86_guest_apic_has_interrupt)(vcpu));
Can you opportunistically align the indentation and drop the outer parantheses? I.e.
return is_guest_mode(vcpu) &&
static_call(kvm_x86_guest_apic_has_interrupt)(vcpu);
> }
>
> diff --git a/kernel/static_call.c b/kernel/static_call.c
> index 43ba0b1e0edb..76abd46fe6ee 100644
> --- a/kernel/static_call.c
> +++ b/kernel/static_call.c
> @@ -503,6 +503,7 @@ long __static_call_return0(void)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__static_call_return0)
This doesn't compile, it needs a semicolon.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-18 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-17 18:08 [PATCH v3 0/6] kvm: x86: better handling of optional kvm_x86_ops Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-17 18:08 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] KVM: x86: return 1 unconditionally for availability of KVM_CAP_VAPIC Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 15:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-23 13:21 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 18:08 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: x86: use static_call_cond for optional callbacks Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 15:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-17 18:08 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] KVM: x86: remove KVM_X86_OP_NULL and mark optional kvm_x86_ops Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 15:52 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-17 18:08 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] KVM: x86: warn on incorrectly NULL members of kvm_x86_ops Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 16:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-17 18:08 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] KVM: x86: make several AVIC callbacks optional Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 16:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-18 17:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 17:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-18 17:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-17 18:08 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: x86: allow defining return-0 static calls Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 16:29 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-02-18 17:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 17:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-17 17:43 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-17 22:30 ` David Laight
2022-03-18 16:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-18 17:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-18 17:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-18 18:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-18 23:03 ` David Laight
2022-03-20 13:58 ` Maxim Levitsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yg/JZZ+i67HDKCVK@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox