From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6624CC433F5 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 17:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237003AbiCNRL4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2022 13:11:56 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49836 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233904AbiCNRLz (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2022 13:11:55 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B225B3DDF6 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 10:10:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7767ED6E; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 10:10:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from monolith.localdoman (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7DB533F66F; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 10:10:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 17:11:08 +0000 From: Alexandru Elisei To: Andre Przywara Cc: Martin Radev , kvm@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 kvmtool 0/5] Fix few small issues in virtio code Message-ID: References: <20220303231050.2146621-1-martin.b.radev@gmail.com> <20220311112321.2f71b6bd@donnerap.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220311112321.2f71b6bd@donnerap.cambridge.arm.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 11:23:21AM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 14:56:30 +0000 > Alexandru Elisei wrote: > > Hi, > > > Hi Martin, > > > > On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 01:10:45AM +0200, Martin Radev wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > [..] > > > The Makefile change is kept in its original form because I didn't understand > > > if there is an issue with it on aarch64. > > > > I'll try to explain it better. According to this blogpost about executable > > stacks [1], gcc marks the stack as executable automatically for assembly > > (.S) files. C files have their stack mark as non-executable by default. If > > any of the object files have the stack executable, then the resulting > > binary also has the stack marked as executable (obviously). > > > > To mark the stack as non-executable in assembly files, the empty section > > .note.GNU-stack must be present in the file. This is a marking to tell > > the linker that the final executable does not require an executable stack. > > When the linker finds this section, it will create a PT_GNU_STACK empty > > segment in the final executable. This segment tells Linux to mark the stack > > as non-executable when it loads the binary. > > Ah, many thanks for the explanation, that makes sense. > > > The only assembly files that kvmtool compiles into objects are the x86 > > files x86/bios/entry.S and x86/bios/bios-rom.S; the other architectures are > > not affected by this. I haven't found any instances where these files (and > > the other files they are including) do a call/jmp to something on the > > stack, so I've added the .note.GNU-Stack section to the files: > > Yes, looks that the same to me, actually the assembly looks more like > marshalling arguments than actual code, so we should be safe. > > Alex, can you send this as a proper patch. It should be somewhat > independent of Martin's series, code-wise, so at least it should apply and > build. Martin, would you like to pick up the diff and turn it into a proper patch? You don't need to credit me as the author, you can just add a Suggested-by: Alexandru Elisei tag in the commit message. Or do you want me to turn this into a patch? If I do, I'll add a Reported-by: Martin Radev tag to it. I don't have a preference, I am asking because you were the first person who discovered and tried to fix this. Thanks, Alex > > Cheers, > Andre > > > > > diff --git a/x86/bios/bios-rom.S b/x86/bios/bios-rom.S > > index 3269ce9793ae..571029fc157e 100644 > > --- a/x86/bios/bios-rom.S > > +++ b/x86/bios/bios-rom.S > > @@ -10,3 +10,6 @@ > > GLOBAL(bios_rom) > > .incbin "x86/bios/bios.bin" > > END(bios_rom) > > + > > +# Mark the stack as non-executable. > > +.section .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits > > diff --git a/x86/bios/entry.S b/x86/bios/entry.S > > index 85056e9816c4..4d5bb663a25d 100644 > > --- a/x86/bios/entry.S > > +++ b/x86/bios/entry.S > > @@ -90,3 +90,6 @@ GLOBAL(__locals) > > #include "local.S" > > > > END(__locals) > > + > > +# Mark the stack as non-executable. > > +.section .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits > > > > which makes the final executable have a non-executable stack. Did some very > > *light* testing by booting a guest, and everything looked right to me. > > > > [1] https://www.airs.com/blog/archives/518 > > > > Thanks, > > Alex > > > > > > > > Martin Radev (5): > > > kvmtool: Add WARN_ONCE macro > > > virtio: Sanitize config accesses > > > virtio: Check for overflows in QUEUE_NOTIFY and QUEUE_SEL > > > Makefile: Mark stack as not executable > > > mmio: Sanitize addr and len > > > > > > Makefile | 7 +++-- > > > include/kvm/util.h | 10 +++++++ > > > include/kvm/virtio-9p.h | 1 + > > > include/kvm/virtio.h | 3 ++- > > > mmio.c | 4 +++ > > > virtio/9p.c | 27 ++++++++++++++----- > > > virtio/balloon.c | 10 ++++++- > > > virtio/blk.c | 10 ++++++- > > > virtio/console.c | 10 ++++++- > > > virtio/mmio.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > > > virtio/net.c | 12 +++++++-- > > > virtio/pci.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > > > virtio/rng.c | 8 +++++- > > > virtio/scsi.c | 10 ++++++- > > > virtio/vsock.c | 10 ++++++- > > > 15 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > > > > > > -- > > > 2.25.1 > > > >