From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 21/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap invalidated roots via asynchronous worker
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 21:06:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YiEtxt6pQHtemFkm@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YiErEoIMDZy94HIH@google.com>
On Thu, Mar 03, 2022, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > + root->tdp_mmu_async_data = kvm;
> > + INIT_WORK(&root->tdp_mmu_async_work, tdp_mmu_zap_root_work);
> > + queue_work(kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_zap_wq, &root->tdp_mmu_async_work);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline bool kvm_tdp_root_mark_invalid(struct kvm_mmu_page *page)
> > +{
> > + union kvm_mmu_page_role role = page->role;
> > + role.invalid = true;
> > +
> > + /* No need to use cmpxchg, only the invalid bit can change. */
> > + role.word = xchg(&page->role.word, role.word);
> > + return role.invalid;
>
> This helper is unused. It _could_ be used here, but I think it belongs in the
> next patch. Critically, until zapping defunct roots creates the invariant that
> invalid roots are _always_ zapped via worker, kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots()
> must not assume that an invalid root is queued for zapping. I.e. doing this
> before the "Zap defunct roots" would be wrong:
>
> list_for_each_entry(root, &kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_roots, link) {
> if (kvm_tdp_root_mark_invalid(root))
> continue;
>
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!kvm_tdp_mmu_get_root(root)));
> continue;
>
> tdp_mmu_schedule_zap_root(kvm, root);
> }
Gah, lost my train of thought and forgot that this _can_ re-queue a root even in
this patch, it just can't it just can't re-queue a root that is _currently_ queued.
The re-queue scenario happens if a root is queued and zapped, but is kept alive
by a vCPU that hasn't yet put its reference. If another memslot comes along before
the (sleeping) vCPU drops its reference, this will re-queue the root.
It's not a major problem in this patch as it's a small amount of wasted effort,
but it will be an issue when the "put" path starts using the queue, as that will
create a scenario where a memslot update (or NX toggle) can come along while a
defunct root is in the zap queue.
Checking for role.invalid is wrong (as above), so for this patch I think the
easiest thing is to use tdp_mmu_async_data as a sentinel that the root was zapped
in the past and doesn't need to be re-zapped.
/*
* Mark each TDP MMU root as invalid to prevent vCPUs from reusing a root that
* is about to be zapped, e.g. in response to a memslots update. The actual
* zapping is performed asynchronously, so a reference is taken on all roots.
* Using a separate workqueue makes it easy to ensure that the destruction is
* performed before the "fast zap" completes, without keeping a separate list
* of invalidated roots; the list is effectively the list of work items in
* the workqueue.
*
* Skip roots that were already queued for zapping, the "fast zap" path is the
* only user of the zap queue and always flushes the queue under slots_lock,
* i.e. the queued zap is guaranteed to have completed already.
*
* Because mmu_lock is held for write, it should be impossible to observe a
* root with zero refcount,* i.e. the list of roots cannot be stale.
*
* This has essentially the same effect for the TDP MMU
* as updating mmu_valid_gen does for the shadow MMU.
*/
void kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots(struct kvm *kvm)
{
struct kvm_mmu_page *root;
lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
list_for_each_entry(root, &kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_roots, link) {
if (root->tdp_mmu_async_data)
continue;
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!kvm_tdp_mmu_get_root(root)))
continue;
root->role.invalid = true;
tdp_mmu_schedule_zap_root(kvm, root);
}
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-03 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-03 19:38 [PATCH v4 00/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Overhaul TDP MMU zapping and flushing Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 01/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Check for present SPTE when clearing dirty bit in TDP MMU Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 02/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix wrong/misleading comments in TDP MMU fast zap Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 03/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Formalize TDP MMU's (unintended?) deferred TLB flush logic Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 23:39 ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 04/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Document that zapping invalidated roots doesn't need to flush Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 05/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Require mmu_lock be held for write in unyielding root iter Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 06/30] KVM: x86/mmu: only perform eager page splitting on valid roots Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 20:03 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 07/30] KVM: x86/mmu: do not allow readers to acquire references to invalid roots Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 20:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 08/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Check for !leaf=>leaf, not PFN change, in TDP MMU SP removal Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 09/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Batch TLB flushes from TDP MMU for MMU notifier change_spte Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 10/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop RCU after processing each root in MMU notifier hooks Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 11/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Add helpers to read/write TDP MMU SPTEs and document RCU Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 12/30] KVM: x86/mmu: WARN if old _or_ new SPTE is REMOVED in non-atomic path Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 13/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Refactor low-level TDP MMU set SPTE helper to take raw values Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 14/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap only the target TDP MMU shadow page in NX recovery Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 15/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Skip remote TLB flush when zapping all of TDP MMU Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 16/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Add dedicated helper to zap TDP MMU root shadow page Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-04 0:07 ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 17/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Require mmu_lock be held for write to zap TDP MMU range Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-04 0:14 ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 18/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap only TDP MMU leafs in kvm_zap_gfn_range() Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-04 1:16 ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-04 16:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-04 18:00 ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-04 18:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 15:09 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-03-13 18:40 ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-25 15:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-26 18:10 ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-28 15:06 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 19/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Do remote TLB flush before dropping RCU in TDP MMU resched Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-04 1:19 ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 20/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Defer TLB flush to caller when freeing TDP MMU shadow pages Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 21/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap invalidated roots via asynchronous worker Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 20:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 21:06 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-03-03 21:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 21:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-04 6:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-04 16:02 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-04 18:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-05 0:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-05 19:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 21:29 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 17:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 22/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow yielding when zapping GFNs for defunct TDP MMU root Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 23/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap roots in two passes to avoid inducing RCU stalls Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 24/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap defunct roots via asynchronous worker Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 22:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 25/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Check for a REMOVED leaf SPTE before making the SPTE Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 26/30] KVM: x86/mmu: WARN on any attempt to atomically update REMOVED SPTE Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 27/30] KVM: selftests: Move raw KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION helper to utils Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 28/30] KVM: selftests: Split out helper to allocate guest mem via memfd Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 29/30] KVM: selftests: Define cpu_relax() helpers for s390 and x86 Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 30/30] KVM: selftests: Add test to populate a VM with the max possible guest mem Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 14:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 15:36 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-03-08 21:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 17:25 ` [PATCH v4 00/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Overhaul TDP MMU zapping and flushing Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YiEtxt6pQHtemFkm@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).