From: Sebastian Ene <sebastianene@google.com>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, qperret@google.com, will@kernel.org,
julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, maz@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH kvmtool v8 2/3] aarch64: Add stolen time support
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 13:14:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YidWsYk9Mwklng+n@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YiczmAGAIf0BYLNr@monolith.localdoman>
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 10:44:40AM +0000, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
>
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 02:42:43PM +0000, Sebastian Ene wrote:
> > This patch adds support for stolen time by sharing a memory region
> > with the guest which will be used by the hypervisor to store the stolen
> > time information. Reserve a 64kb MMIO memory region after the RTC peripheral
> > to be used by pvtime. The exact format of the structure stored by the
> > hypervisor is described in the ARM DEN0057A document.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Ene <sebastianene@google.com>
> > ---
> > Makefile | 1 +
> > arm/aarch64/arm-cpu.c | 2 +-
> > arm/aarch64/include/kvm/kvm-cpu-arch.h | 2 +
> > arm/aarch64/pvtime.c | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arm/include/arm-common/kvm-arch.h | 6 +-
> > arm/kvm-cpu.c | 1 +
> > include/kvm/kvm-config.h | 1 +
> > 7 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 arm/aarch64/pvtime.c
> >
> > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> > index f251147..e9121dc 100644
> > --- a/Makefile
> > +++ b/Makefile
> > @@ -182,6 +182,7 @@ ifeq ($(ARCH), arm64)
> > OBJS += arm/aarch64/arm-cpu.o
> > OBJS += arm/aarch64/kvm-cpu.o
> > OBJS += arm/aarch64/kvm.o
> > + OBJS += arm/aarch64/pvtime.o
> > ARCH_INCLUDE := $(HDRS_ARM_COMMON)
> > ARCH_INCLUDE += -Iarm/aarch64/include
> >
> > diff --git a/arm/aarch64/arm-cpu.c b/arm/aarch64/arm-cpu.c
> > index d7572b7..7e4a3c1 100644
> > --- a/arm/aarch64/arm-cpu.c
> > +++ b/arm/aarch64/arm-cpu.c
> > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ static void generate_fdt_nodes(void *fdt, struct kvm *kvm)
> > static int arm_cpu__vcpu_init(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu)
> > {
> > vcpu->generate_fdt_nodes = generate_fdt_nodes;
> > - return 0;
> > + return kvm_cpu__setup_pvtime(vcpu);
> > }
> >
> > static struct kvm_arm_target target_generic_v8 = {
> > diff --git a/arm/aarch64/include/kvm/kvm-cpu-arch.h b/arm/aarch64/include/kvm/kvm-cpu-arch.h
> > index 8dfb82e..35996dc 100644
> > --- a/arm/aarch64/include/kvm/kvm-cpu-arch.h
> > +++ b/arm/aarch64/include/kvm/kvm-cpu-arch.h
> > @@ -19,5 +19,7 @@
> >
> > void kvm_cpu__select_features(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init);
> > int kvm_cpu__configure_features(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu);
> > +int kvm_cpu__setup_pvtime(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu);
> > +int kvm_cpu__teardown_pvtime(struct kvm *kvm);
> >
> > #endif /* KVM__KVM_CPU_ARCH_H */
> > diff --git a/arm/aarch64/pvtime.c b/arm/aarch64/pvtime.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..4db2e9f
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arm/aarch64/pvtime.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
> > +#include "kvm/kvm.h"
> > +#include "kvm/kvm-cpu.h"
> > +#include "kvm/util.h"
> > +
> > +#include <linux/byteorder.h>
> > +#include <linux/types.h>
> > +
> > +#define ARM_PVTIME_STRUCT_SIZE (64)
> > +
> > +struct pvtime_data_priv {
> > + bool is_failed_cfg;
> > + void *usr_mem;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct pvtime_data_priv pvtime_data = {
> > + .is_failed_cfg = true,
> > + .usr_mem = NULL
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int pvtime__alloc_region(struct kvm *kvm)
> > +{
> > + char *mem;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + mem = mmap(NULL, ARM_PVTIME_BASE, PROT_RW,
> > + MAP_ANON_NORESERVE, -1, 0);
> > + if (mem == MAP_FAILED)
> > + return -errno;
> > +
> > + ret = kvm__register_ram(kvm, ARM_PVTIME_BASE,
> > + ARM_PVTIME_BASE, mem);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + munmap(mem, ARM_PVTIME_BASE);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + pvtime_data.usr_mem = mem;
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int pvtime__teardown_region(struct kvm *kvm)
> > +{
> > + if (pvtime_data.usr_mem == NULL)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + kvm__destroy_mem(kvm, ARM_PVTIME_BASE,
> > + ARM_PVTIME_BASE, pvtime_data.usr_mem);
> > + munmap(pvtime_data.usr_mem, ARM_PVTIME_BASE);
> > + pvtime_data.usr_mem = NULL;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int kvm_cpu__setup_pvtime(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > + bool has_stolen_time;
> > + u64 pvtime_guest_addr = ARM_PVTIME_BASE + vcpu->cpu_id *
> > + ARM_PVTIME_STRUCT_SIZE;
> > + struct kvm_config *kvm_cfg = NULL;
> > + struct kvm_device_attr pvtime_attr = (struct kvm_device_attr) {
> > + .group = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PVTIME_CTRL,
> > + .addr = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PVTIME_IPA
> > + };
> > +
> > + kvm_cfg = &vcpu->kvm->cfg;
> > + if (kvm_cfg->no_pvtime)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + if (!pvtime_data.is_failed_cfg)
> > + return -ENOTSUP;
> > +
> > + has_stolen_time = kvm__supports_extension(vcpu->kvm,
> > + KVM_CAP_STEAL_TIME);
> > + if (!has_stolen_time) {
> > + kvm_cfg->no_pvtime = true;
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = ioctl(vcpu->vcpu_fd, KVM_HAS_DEVICE_ATTR, &pvtime_attr);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + perror("KVM_HAS_DEVICE_ATTR failed\n");
> > + goto out_err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!pvtime_data.usr_mem) {
> > + ret = pvtime__alloc_region(vcpu->kvm);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + perror("Failed allocating pvtime region\n");
> > + goto out_err;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + pvtime_attr.addr = (u64)&pvtime_guest_addr;
> > + ret = ioctl(vcpu->vcpu_fd, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &pvtime_attr);
> > + if (!ret)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + perror("KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR failed\n");
> > + pvtime__teardown_region(vcpu->kvm);
> > +out_err:
> > + pvtime_data.is_failed_cfg = false;
>
> kvm_cpu__init() calls kvm_cpu__arch_init()->kvm_cpu__setup_pvtime() for each
> VCPU from the main thread (so sequentually), not from the VCPU threads. If this
> function returns an error, kvm_cpu__arch_init() calls die(), which means that
> kvmtool will terminate without calling kvm_cpu__setup_pvtime() for the other
> VCPUs.
>
> What I'm trying to say is that the field is_failed_cfg is not useful, because if
> one VCPU fails initialization, then kvmtool will not attempt to initialize the
> rest of the VCPUs.
>
> If you drop is_failed_cfg you can also drop the pvtime_data_priv struct and use
> a static user_mem variable (up to you).
>
Got it, thanks I will do the cleanup by dropping those pieces.
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int kvm_cpu__teardown_pvtime(struct kvm *kvm)
> > +{
> > + return pvtime__teardown_region(kvm);
> > +}
> > diff --git a/arm/include/arm-common/kvm-arch.h b/arm/include/arm-common/kvm-arch.h
> > index c645ac0..43b1f77 100644
> > --- a/arm/include/arm-common/kvm-arch.h
> > +++ b/arm/include/arm-common/kvm-arch.h
> > @@ -15,7 +15,8 @@
> > * | PCI |////| plat | | | | |
> > * | I/O |////| MMIO: | Flash | virtio | GIC | PCI | DRAM
> > * | space |////| UART, | | MMIO | | (AXI) |
> > - * | |////| RTC | | | | |
> > + * | |////| RTC, | | | | |
> > + * | |////| PVTIME| | | | |
> > * +-------+----+-------+-------+--------+-----+---------+---......
> > */
> >
> > @@ -34,6 +35,9 @@
> > #define ARM_RTC_MMIO_BASE (ARM_UART_MMIO_BASE + ARM_UART_MMIO_SIZE)
> > #define ARM_RTC_MMIO_SIZE 0x10000
> >
> > +#define ARM_PVTIME_BASE (ARM_RTC_MMIO_BASE + ARM_RTC_MMIO_SIZE)
> > +#define ARM_PVTIME_SIZE SZ_64K
> > +
> > #define KVM_FLASH_MMIO_BASE (ARM_MMIO_AREA + 0x1000000)
> > #define KVM_FLASH_MAX_SIZE 0x1000000
> >
> > diff --git a/arm/kvm-cpu.c b/arm/kvm-cpu.c
> > index 84ac1e9..00660d6 100644
> > --- a/arm/kvm-cpu.c
> > +++ b/arm/kvm-cpu.c
> > @@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ void kvm_cpu__arch_nmi(struct kvm_cpu *cpu)
> >
> > void kvm_cpu__delete(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu)
> > {
> > + kvm_cpu__teardown_pvtime(vcpu->kvm);
>
> This causes compilation for aarch32 to fail:
>
> arm/kvm-cpu.c: In function ‘kvm_cpu__delete’:
> arm/kvm-cpu.c:147:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘kvm_cpu__teardown_pvtime’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 147 | kvm_cpu__teardown_pvtime(vcpu->kvm);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arm/kvm-cpu.c:147:2: error: nested extern declaration of ‘kvm_cpu__teardown_pvtime’ [-Werror=nested-externs]
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> make: *** [Makefile:482: arm/kvm-cpu.o] Error 1
>
> The reason for that is that there is no stub for kvm_cpu__teardown_pvtime() for
> aarch32. This fixes the compilation error for me:
>
I am afraid I didn't check on aarch32. Thanks for raising this issue, I
will fix the problem.
> diff --git a/arm/aarch32/include/kvm/kvm-cpu-arch.h b/arm/aarch32/include/kvm/kvm-cpu-arch.h
> index 780e0e2f0934..ae77a136d0ce 100644
> --- a/arm/aarch32/include/kvm/kvm-cpu-arch.h
> +++ b/arm/aarch32/include/kvm/kvm-cpu-arch.h
> @@ -19,5 +19,9 @@ static inline int kvm_cpu__configure_features(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> +static inline int kvm_cpu__teardown_pvtime(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
>
> #endif /* KVM__KVM_CPU_ARCH_H */
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
> > free(vcpu);
> > }
Thanks for the review,
Sebastian
> >
> > diff --git a/include/kvm/kvm-config.h b/include/kvm/kvm-config.h
> > index 6a5720c..48adf27 100644
> > --- a/include/kvm/kvm-config.h
> > +++ b/include/kvm/kvm-config.h
> > @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ struct kvm_config {
> > bool no_dhcp;
> > bool ioport_debug;
> > bool mmio_debug;
> > + bool no_pvtime;
> > };
> >
> > #endif
> > --
> > 2.35.1.616.g0bdcbb4464-goog
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-08 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-07 14:42 [PATCH kvmtool v8 0/3] aarch64: Add stolen time support Sebastian Ene
2022-03-07 14:42 ` [PATCH kvmtool v8 1/3] aarch64: Populate the vCPU struct before target->init() Sebastian Ene
2022-03-08 10:28 ` Alexandru Elisei
2022-03-08 13:17 ` Sebastian Ene
2022-03-07 14:42 ` [PATCH kvmtool v8 2/3] aarch64: Add stolen time support Sebastian Ene
2022-03-08 10:44 ` Alexandru Elisei
2022-03-08 13:14 ` Sebastian Ene [this message]
2022-03-07 14:42 ` [PATCH kvmtool v8 3/3] Add --no-pvtime command line argument Sebastian Ene
2022-03-08 10:46 ` Alexandru Elisei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YidWsYk9Mwklng+n@google.com \
--to=sebastianene@google.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox