public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, dmatlack@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/25] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid indirect call for get_cr3
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 16:53:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YieJ9lkq7R87m1mJ@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <96ff1628-eeb2-4d12-f4eb-287dd8fc9948@redhat.com>

On Tue, Mar 08, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 3/8/22 17:32, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > 
> > Aha!  An idea that would provide line of sight to avoiding retpoline in all cases
> > once we use static_call() for nested_ops, which I really want to do...  Drop the
> > mmu hook entirely and replace it with:
> > 
> > static inline kvm_mmu_get_guest_pgd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > {
> > 	if (!mmu_is_nested(vcpu))
> > 		return kvm_read_cr3(vcpu);
> > 	else
> > 		return kvm_x86_ops.nested_ops->get_guest_pgd(vcpu);
> > }
> 
> Makes sense, but I think you mean
> 
> static inline unsigned long kvm_mmu_get_guest_pgd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> 						  struct kvm_mmu *mmu)
> {
> 	if (unlikely(vcpu == &vcpu->arch.guest_mmu))

Well, not that certainly :-)

	if (mmu == &vcpu->arch.guest_mmu)

But you're right, we need to be able to do kvm_read_cr3() for the actual nested_mmu.

> 		return kvm_x86_ops.nested_ops->get_guest_pgd(vcpu);
> 	else
> 		return kvm_read_cr3(vcpu);
> }
> 
> ?

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-08 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-21 16:22 [PATCH v2 00/25] KVM MMU refactoring part 2: role changes Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 01/25] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid indirect call for get_cr3 Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 16:16   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 16:21     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 16:32       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 16:43         ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 16:53           ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-03-08 17:14             ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 02/25] KVM: x86/mmu: nested EPT cannot be used in SMM Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 16:18   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 03/25] KVM: x86/mmu: constify uses of struct kvm_mmu_role_regs Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 16:22   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 04/25] KVM: x86/mmu: pull computation of kvm_mmu_role_regs to kvm_init_mmu Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 05/25] KVM: x86/mmu: rephrase unclear comment Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 16:39   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 06/25] KVM: nVMX/nSVM: do not monkey-patch inject_page_fault callback Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 17:13   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 20:34     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 07/25] KVM: x86/mmu: remove "bool base_only" arguments Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 17:15   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 08/25] KVM: x86/mmu: split cpu_mode from mmu_role Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 17:36   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 17:49     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 18:55   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-09  9:58     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-09 15:38       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-09 15:40         ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 09/25] KVM: x86/mmu: do not recompute root level from kvm_mmu_role_regs Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 17:41   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 10/25] KVM: x86/mmu: remove ept_ad field Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 17:42   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 11/25] KVM: x86/mmu: remove kvm_calc_shadow_root_page_role_common Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 17:48   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 17:50     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 18:17       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 18:18         ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 12/25] KVM: x86/mmu: cleanup computation of MMU roles for two-dimensional paging Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 18:11   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 18:24     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 18:44       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 18:38     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 13/25] KVM: x86/mmu: cleanup computation of MMU roles for shadow paging Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 14/25] KVM: x86/mmu: store shadow EFER.NX in the MMU role Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 15/25] KVM: x86/mmu: remove extended bits from mmu_role, rename field Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 19:02   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 16/25] KVM: x86/mmu: rename kvm_mmu_role union Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 19:15   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 17/25] KVM: x86/mmu: remove redundant bits from extended role Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 18/25] KVM: x86/mmu: remove valid " Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 19/25] KVM: x86/mmu: simplify and/or inline computation of shadow MMU roles Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 19:35   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 19:41     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-09 10:33     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 20/25] KVM: x86/mmu: pull CPU mode computation to kvm_init_mmu Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 19:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 21/25] KVM: x86/mmu: replace shadow_root_level with root_role.level Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 19:48   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 22/25] KVM: x86/mmu: replace root_level with cpu_mode.base.level Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 19:49   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 23/25] KVM: x86/mmu: replace direct_map with root_role.direct Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 19:52   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 24/25] KVM: x86/mmu: initialize constant-value fields just once Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 20:58   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-09 10:34     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 25/25] KVM: x86/mmu: extract initialization of the page walking data Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 20:02   ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YieJ9lkq7R87m1mJ@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox