[PATCH v2 05/25] KVM: x86/mmu: rephrase unclear comment

Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21T16:23:01Z

If accessed bits are not supported there simple isn't any distinction
between accessed and non-accessed gPTEs, so the comment does not make
much sense. Rephrase it in terms of what happens if accessed bits
*are* supported.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
index 80b4b291002a..d1d17d28e81b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static bool FNAME(prefetch_invalid_gpte)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
if (!FNAME(is_present_gpte)(gpte))
goto no_present;

- /* if accessed bit is not supported prefetch non accessed gpte */
+ /* if accessed bit is supported, prefetch only accessed gpte */
if (PT_HAVE_ACCESSED_DIRTY(vcpu->arch.mmu) &&
!(gpte & PT_GUEST_ACCESSED_MASK))
goto no_present;
--
2.31.1