From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, dmatlack@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/25] KVM: x86/mmu: do not recompute root level from kvm_mmu_role_regs
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 17:41:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YieVPL2rwAQGB+cj@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220221162243.683208-10-pbonzini@redhat.com>
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The root_level can be found in the cpu_mode (in fact the field
> is superfluous and could be removed, but one thing at a time).
> Since there is only one usage left of role_regs_to_root_level,
> inline it into kvm_calc_cpu_mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 23 ++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 1af898f0cf87..6e539fc2c9c7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -244,19 +244,6 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_role_regs vcpu_to_role_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return regs;
> }
>
> -static int role_regs_to_root_level(const struct kvm_mmu_role_regs *regs)
> -{
> - if (!____is_cr0_pg(regs))
> - return 0;
> - else if (____is_efer_lma(regs))
> - return ____is_cr4_la57(regs) ? PT64_ROOT_5LEVEL :
> - PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL;
> - else if (____is_cr4_pae(regs))
> - return PT32E_ROOT_LEVEL;
> - else
> - return PT32_ROOT_LEVEL;
> -}
> -
> static inline bool kvm_available_flush_tlb_with_range(void)
> {
> return kvm_x86_ops.tlb_remote_flush_with_range;
> @@ -4695,7 +4682,13 @@ kvm_calc_cpu_mode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_mmu_role_regs *regs)
> role.base.smep_andnot_wp = ____is_cr4_smep(regs) && !____is_cr0_wp(regs);
> role.base.smap_andnot_wp = ____is_cr4_smap(regs) && !____is_cr0_wp(regs);
> role.base.has_4_byte_gpte = !____is_cr4_pae(regs);
> - role.base.level = role_regs_to_root_level(regs);
> +
> + if (____is_efer_lma(regs))
> + role.base.level = ____is_cr4_la57(regs) ? PT64_ROOT_5LEVEL : PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL;
Can we wrap this, even if indentation is reduced? I find it much easier to quickly
understand the if-else paths if they're stacked and not run out to almost 100 chars.
if (____is_efer_lma(regs))
role.base.level = ____is_cr4_la57(regs) ? PT64_ROOT_5LEVEL :
PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL;
else if (____is_cr4_pae(regs))
role.base.level = PT32E_ROOT_LEVEL;
else
role.base.level = PT32_ROOT_LEVEL;
> + else if (____is_cr4_pae(regs))
> + role.base.level = PT32E_ROOT_LEVEL;
> + else
> + role.base.level = PT32_ROOT_LEVEL;
>
> role.ext.cr0_pg = 1;
> role.ext.cr4_pae = ____is_cr4_pae(regs);
> @@ -4790,7 +4783,7 @@ static void init_kvm_tdp_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> context->get_guest_pgd = kvm_get_guest_cr3;
> context->get_pdptr = kvm_pdptr_read;
> context->inject_page_fault = kvm_inject_page_fault;
> - context->root_level = role_regs_to_root_level(regs);
> + context->root_level = cpu_mode.base.level;
>
> if (!is_cr0_pg(context))
> context->gva_to_gpa = nonpaging_gva_to_gpa;
> --
> 2.31.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-08 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-21 16:22 [PATCH v2 00/25] KVM MMU refactoring part 2: role changes Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 01/25] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid indirect call for get_cr3 Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 16:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 16:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 16:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 16:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 16:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 17:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 02/25] KVM: x86/mmu: nested EPT cannot be used in SMM Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 16:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 03/25] KVM: x86/mmu: constify uses of struct kvm_mmu_role_regs Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 16:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 04/25] KVM: x86/mmu: pull computation of kvm_mmu_role_regs to kvm_init_mmu Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 05/25] KVM: x86/mmu: rephrase unclear comment Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 16:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 06/25] KVM: nVMX/nSVM: do not monkey-patch inject_page_fault callback Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 17:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 20:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 07/25] KVM: x86/mmu: remove "bool base_only" arguments Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 17:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 08/25] KVM: x86/mmu: split cpu_mode from mmu_role Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 17:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 17:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 18:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-09 9:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-09 15:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-09 15:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 09/25] KVM: x86/mmu: do not recompute root level from kvm_mmu_role_regs Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 17:41 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 10/25] KVM: x86/mmu: remove ept_ad field Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 17:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 11/25] KVM: x86/mmu: remove kvm_calc_shadow_root_page_role_common Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 17:48 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 17:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 18:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 18:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 12/25] KVM: x86/mmu: cleanup computation of MMU roles for two-dimensional paging Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 18:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 18:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 18:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 18:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 13/25] KVM: x86/mmu: cleanup computation of MMU roles for shadow paging Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 14/25] KVM: x86/mmu: store shadow EFER.NX in the MMU role Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 15/25] KVM: x86/mmu: remove extended bits from mmu_role, rename field Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 19:02 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 16/25] KVM: x86/mmu: rename kvm_mmu_role union Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 19:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 17/25] KVM: x86/mmu: remove redundant bits from extended role Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 18/25] KVM: x86/mmu: remove valid " Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 19/25] KVM: x86/mmu: simplify and/or inline computation of shadow MMU roles Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 19:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 19:41 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-09 10:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 20/25] KVM: x86/mmu: pull CPU mode computation to kvm_init_mmu Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 19:45 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 21/25] KVM: x86/mmu: replace shadow_root_level with root_role.level Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 19:48 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 22/25] KVM: x86/mmu: replace root_level with cpu_mode.base.level Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 19:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 23/25] KVM: x86/mmu: replace direct_map with root_role.direct Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 19:52 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 24/25] KVM: x86/mmu: initialize constant-value fields just once Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 20:58 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-09 10:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 25/25] KVM: x86/mmu: extract initialization of the page walking data Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 20:02 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YieVPL2rwAQGB+cj@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox