Re: [PATCH v12 43/46] virt: Add SEV-SNP guest driver

Peter Gonda
2022-08-24T19:29:07Z

On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:01 PM Dionna Amalie Glaze
<dionnaglaze@google.com> wrote:
>
> Apologies for the necropost, but I noticed strange behavior testing my
> own Golang-based wrapper around the /dev/sev-guest driver.
>
> > +
> > +static int handle_guest_request(struct snp_guest_dev *snp_dev, u64 exit_code, int msg_ver,
> > + u8 type, void *req_buf, size_t req_sz, void *resp_buf,
> > + u32 resp_sz, __u64 *fw_err)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long err;
> > + u64 seqno;
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + /* Get message sequence and verify that its a non-zero */
> > + seqno = snp_get_msg_seqno(snp_dev);
> > + if (!seqno)
> > + return -EIO;
> > +
> > + memset(snp_dev->response, 0, sizeof(struct snp_guest_msg));
> > +
> > + /* Encrypt the userspace provided payload */
> > + rc = enc_payload(snp_dev, seqno, msg_ver, type, req_buf, req_sz);
> > + if (rc)
> > + return rc;
> > +
> > + /* Call firmware to process the request */
> > + rc = snp_issue_guest_request(exit_code, &snp_dev->input, &err);
> > + if (fw_err)
> > + *fw_err = err;
> > +
> > + if (rc)
> > + return rc;
> > +
>
> The fw_err is written back regardless of rc, so since err is
> uninitialized, you can end up with garbage written back. I've worked
> around this by only caring about fw_err when the result is -EIO, but
> thought that I should bring this up.

I also noticed that we use a u64 in snp_guest_request_ioctl.fw_err and
u32 in sev_issue_cmd.error when these should be errors from the
sev_ret_code enum IIUC.

We can fix snp_issue_guest_request() to set |fw_err| to zero when it
returns 0 but what should we return to userspace if we encounter an
error that prevents the FW from even being called? In ` crypto: ccp -
Ensure psp_ret is always init'd in __sev_platform_init_locked()` we
set the return to -1 so we could continue that convection here and
better codify it in the sev_ret_code enum.

>
> --
> -Dionna Glaze, PhD (she/her)