From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] KVM: X86: Save&restore the triple fault request
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 23:31:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YkzRSHHDMaVBQrxd@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220318074955.22428-2-chenyi.qiang@intel.com>
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022, Chenyi Qiang wrote:
> For the triple fault sythesized by KVM, e.g. the RSM path or
> nested_vmx_abort(), if KVM exits to userspace before the request is
> serviced, userspace could migrate the VM and lose the triple fault.
> Fix this issue by adding a new event KVM_VCPUEVENT_TRIPLE_FAULT in
> get/set_vcpu_events() to track the triple fault request.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@intel.com>
> ---
> Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 6 ++++++
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> index 691ff84444bd..9682b0a438bd 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> @@ -1146,6 +1146,9 @@ The following bits are defined in the flags field:
> fields contain a valid state. This bit will be set whenever
> KVM_CAP_EXCEPTION_PAYLOAD is enabled.
>
> +- KVM_VCPUEVENT_TRIPLE_FAULT may be set to signal that there's a
> + triple fault request waiting to be serviced.
Please avoid "request" in the docs, as before, that's a KVM implemenation detail.
For this one, maybe "there's a pending triple fault event"?
> +
> ARM/ARM64:
> ^^^^^^^^^^
>
> @@ -1241,6 +1244,9 @@ can be set in the flags field to signal that the
> exception_has_payload, exception_payload, and exception.pending fields
> contain a valid state and shall be written into the VCPU.
>
> +KVM_VCPUEVENT_TRIPLE_FAULT can be set in flags field to signal that a
> +triple fault request should be made.
And here, "to signal that KVM should synthesize a triple fault for the guest"?
> +
> ARM/ARM64:
> ^^^^^^^^^^
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index bf6e96011dfe..d8ef0d993e86 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -325,6 +325,7 @@ struct kvm_reinject_control {
> #define KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SHADOW 0x00000004
> #define KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SMM 0x00000008
> #define KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_PAYLOAD 0x00000010
> +#define KVM_VCPUEVENT_TRIPLE_FAULT 0x00000020
>
> /* Interrupt shadow states */
> #define KVM_X86_SHADOW_INT_MOV_SS 0x01
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 4fa4d8269e5b..fee402a700df 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -4891,6 +4891,9 @@ static void kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_get_vcpu_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> if (vcpu->kvm->arch.exception_payload_enabled)
> events->flags |= KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_PAYLOAD;
>
> + if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_TRIPLE_FAULT, vcpu))
> + events->flags |= KVM_VCPUEVENT_TRIPLE_FAULT;
> +
> memset(&events->reserved, 0, sizeof(events->reserved));
> }
>
> @@ -4903,7 +4906,8 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> | KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SIPI_VECTOR
> | KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SHADOW
> | KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SMM
> - | KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_PAYLOAD))
> + | KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_PAYLOAD
> + | KVM_VCPUEVENT_TRIPLE_FAULT))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> if (events->flags & KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_PAYLOAD) {
> @@ -4976,6 +4980,9 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> }
> }
>
> + if (events->flags & KVM_VCPUEVENT_TRIPLE_FAULT)
> + kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_TRIPLE_FAULT, vcpu);
> +
> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
Looks correct, but this really needs a selftest, at least for the SET path since
the intent is to use that for the NOTIFY handling. Doesn't need to be super fancy,
e.g. do port I/O from L2, inject a triple fault, and verify L1 sees the appropriate
exit.
Aha! And for the GET path, abuse KVM_X86_SET_MCE with CR4.MCE=0 to coerce KVM into
making a KVM_REQ_TRIPLE_FAULT, that way there's no need to try and hit a timing
window to intercept the request.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-06 5:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-18 7:49 [PATCH v5 0/3] Introduce Notify VM exit Chenyi Qiang
2022-03-18 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] KVM: X86: Save&restore the triple fault request Chenyi Qiang
2022-04-05 23:31 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-04-05 23:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-06 21:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-07 6:12 ` Chenyi Qiang
2022-04-08 2:48 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-06 21:25 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-06 6:46 ` Chenyi Qiang
2022-04-06 21:51 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-18 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] KVM: VMX: Enable Notify VM exit Chenyi Qiang
2022-04-06 0:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-06 18:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-18 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] KVM: Add document for KVM_CAP_X86_NOTIFY_VMEXIT and KVM_EXIT_NOTIFY Chenyi Qiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YkzRSHHDMaVBQrxd@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=chenyi.qiang@intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox