From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: selftests: Fix cut-off of addr_gva2gpa lookup
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 13:56:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ylgn/Jw+FMIFqqc0@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220414010703.72683-1-peterx@redhat.com>
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022, Peter Xu wrote:
> Our QE team reported test failure on access_tracking_perf_test:
>
> Testing guest mode: PA-bits:ANY, VA-bits:48, 4K pages
> guest physical test memory offset: 0x3fffbffff000
>
> Populating memory : 0.684014577s
> Writing to populated memory : 0.006230175s
> Reading from populated memory : 0.004557805s
> ==== Test Assertion Failure ====
> lib/kvm_util.c:1411: false
> pid=125806 tid=125809 errno=4 - Interrupted system call
> 1 0x0000000000402f7c: addr_gpa2hva at kvm_util.c:1411
> 2 (inlined by) addr_gpa2hva at kvm_util.c:1405
> 3 0x0000000000401f52: lookup_pfn at access_tracking_perf_test.c:98
> 4 (inlined by) mark_vcpu_memory_idle at access_tracking_perf_test.c:152
> 5 (inlined by) vcpu_thread_main at access_tracking_perf_test.c:232
> 6 0x00007fefe9ff81ce: ?? ??:0
> 7 0x00007fefe9c64d82: ?? ??:0
> No vm physical memory at 0xffbffff000
>
> And I can easily reproduce it with a Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 with 46
> bits PA.
>
> It turns out that the address translation for clearing idle page tracking
> returned wrong result, in which addr_gva2gpa()'s last step should have
"should have" is very misleading, that makes it sound like the address was
intentionally truncated. Or did you mean "should have been treated as 64-bit
value"?
> treated "pte[index[0]].pfn" to be a 32bit value.
It didn't get treated as a 32-bit value, it got treated as a 40-bit value, because
the pfn is stored as 40 bits.
struct pageTableEntry {
uint64_t present:1;
uint64_t writable:1;
uint64_t user:1;
uint64_t write_through:1;
uint64_t cache_disable:1;
uint64_t accessed:1;
uint64_t dirty:1;
uint64_t reserved_07:1;
uint64_t global:1;
uint64_t ignored_11_09:3;
uint64_t pfn:40; <================
uint64_t ignored_62_52:11;
uint64_t execute_disable:1;
};
> In above case the GPA
> address 0x3fffbffff000 got cut-off into 0xffbffff000, then it caused
> further lookup failure in the gpa2hva mapping.
>
> I didn't yet check any other test that may fail too on some hosts, but
> logically any test using addr_gva2gpa() could suffer.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075036
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
> index 9f000dfb5594..6c356fb4a9bf 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
> @@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ vm_paddr_t addr_gva2gpa(struct kvm_vm *vm, vm_vaddr_t gva)
> if (!pte[index[0]].present)
> goto unmapped_gva;
>
> - return (pte[index[0]].pfn * vm->page_size) + (gva & 0xfffu);
> + return ((vm_paddr_t)pte[index[0]].pfn * vm->page_size) + (gva & 0xfffu);
This is but one of many paths that can get burned by pfn being 40 bits. The
most backport friendly fix is probably to add a pfn=>gpa helper and use that to
place the myriad "pfn * vm->page_size" instances.
For a true long term solution, my vote is to do away with the bit field struct
and use #define'd masks and whatnot.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-14 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-14 1:07 [PATCH] kvm: selftests: Fix cut-off of addr_gva2gpa lookup Peter Xu
2022-04-14 1:19 ` Peter Xu
2022-04-14 13:56 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-04-14 14:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-14 21:34 ` Peter Xu
2022-04-14 22:01 ` Jim Mattson
2022-04-15 0:30 ` Peter Xu
2022-04-14 15:05 ` Peter Xu
2022-04-14 15:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ylgn/Jw+FMIFqqc0@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox