From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] KVM: SVM: Re-inject INT3/INTO instead of retrying the instruction
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 14:25:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YmqjxNQiMABl+tX7@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9553b164-67a6-3634-34c5-f7319ce2dc60@maciej.szmigiero.name>
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> On 28.04.2022 11:37, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > On Sat, 2022-04-23 at 02:14 +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > @@ -1618,7 +1644,7 @@ static int svm_set_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > > nested_copy_vmcb_control_to_cache(svm, ctl);
> > > svm_switch_vmcb(svm, &svm->nested.vmcb02);
> > > - nested_vmcb02_prepare_control(svm, save->rip);
> > > + nested_vmcb02_prepare_control(svm, svm->vmcb->save.rip);
> >
> > Is this change intentional?
>
> It looks to me the final code is correct since "svm->vmcb->save"
> contains L2 register save, while "save" has L1 register save.
>
> It was the patch 1 from this series that was incorrect in
> using "save->rip" here instead.
Yeah, I botched the fixup.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-28 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-23 2:14 [PATCH v2 00/11] KVM: SVM: Fix soft int/ex re-injection Sean Christopherson
2022-04-23 2:14 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] KVM: nSVM: Sync next_rip field from vmcb12 to vmcb02 Sean Christopherson
2022-04-28 9:33 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-23 2:14 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] KVM: SVM: Don't BUG if userspace injects a soft interrupt with GIF=0 Sean Christopherson
2022-04-28 7:35 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-28 13:27 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-28 14:34 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-28 15:04 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-28 16:33 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-23 2:14 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] KVM: SVM: Unwind "speculative" RIP advancement if INTn injection "fails" Sean Christopherson
2022-04-23 2:14 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] KVM: SVM: Stuff next_rip on emulated INT3 injection if NRIPS is supported Sean Christopherson
2022-04-23 2:14 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] KVM: SVM: Re-inject INT3/INTO instead of retrying the instruction Sean Christopherson
2022-04-25 22:59 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-28 9:37 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-28 13:36 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-28 14:25 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-04-23 2:14 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] KVM: SVM: Re-inject INTn instead of retrying the insn on "failure" Sean Christopherson
2022-04-23 2:14 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] KVM: x86: Trace re-injected exceptions Sean Christopherson
2022-04-28 9:48 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-23 2:14 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] KVM: x86: Print error code in exception injection tracepoint iff valid Sean Christopherson
2022-04-28 9:49 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-23 2:14 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] KVM: x86: Differentiate Soft vs. Hard IRQs vs. reinjected in tracepoint Sean Christopherson
2022-04-25 22:59 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-23 2:14 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] KVM: selftests: nSVM: Add svm_nested_soft_inject_test Sean Christopherson
2022-04-25 23:00 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-23 2:14 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] KVM: SVM: Drop support for CPUs without NRIPS (NextRIP Save) support Sean Christopherson
2022-04-24 9:34 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-25 23:00 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-25 23:01 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] KVM: SVM: Fix soft int/ex re-injection Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-27 18:21 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YmqjxNQiMABl+tX7@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox