From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
mlevitsk@redhat.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: x86: make vendor code check for all nested events
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 17:03:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YmwaVY5vERO43CRI@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220427173758.517087-2-pbonzini@redhat.com>
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Right now, the VMX preemption timer is special cased via the
> hv_timer_pending, but the purpose of the callback can be easily
> extended to observing any event that can occur only in non-root
> mode. Interrupts, NMIs etc. are already handled properly by
> the *_interrupt_allowed callbacks, so what is missing is only
> MTF. Check it in the newly-renamed callback, so that
> kvm_vcpu_running's call to kvm_check_nested_events
> becomes redundant.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 7 ++++++-
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 8 ++++----
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 4ff36610af6a..e2e4f60159e9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1504,7 +1504,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
> struct kvm_x86_nested_ops {
> void (*leave_nested)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> int (*check_events)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> - bool (*hv_timer_pending)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> + bool (*has_events)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void (*triple_fault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> int (*get_state)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct kvm_nested_state __user *user_kvm_nested_state,
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> index 856c87563883..54672025c3a1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> @@ -3857,6 +3857,11 @@ static bool nested_vmx_preemption_timer_pending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.preemption_timer_expired;
> }
>
> +static bool vmx_has_nested_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + return nested_vmx_preemption_timer_pending(vcpu) || vmx->nested.mtf_pending;
This doesn't even compile...
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c: In function ‘vmx_has_nested_events’:
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c:3862:61: error: ‘vmx’ undeclared (first use in this function)
3862 | return nested_vmx_preemption_timer_pending(vcpu) || vmx->nested.mtf_pending;
| ^~~
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c:3862:61: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
CC [M] arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm_onhyperv.o
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c:3863:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type]
3863 | }
| ^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
LD [M] arch/x86/kvm/kvm.o
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-29 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-27 17:37 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: never write to memory from kvm_vcpu_check_block Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-27 17:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: x86: make vendor code check for all nested events Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-27 20:40 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-29 18:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-29 17:03 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-04-29 17:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-29 17:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-27 17:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86: a vCPU with a pending triple fault is runnable Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-27 20:41 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-27 17:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86: never write to memory from kvm_vcpu_check_block Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-27 20:42 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-20 9:31 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Maxim Levitsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YmwaVY5vERO43CRI@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox