From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com,
"moderated list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR ARM64 (KVM/arm64)"
<kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR MIPS (KVM/mips)"
<linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR MIPS (KVM/mips)"
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR RISC-V (KVM/riscv)"
<kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 17/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap collapsible SPTEs at all levels in the shadow MMU
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 16:31:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YnlB8n8UMCuaCj1G@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220422210546.458943-18-dmatlack@google.com>
Maybe a slight tweak to the shortlog? "Zap collapsible SPTEs at all levels in
the shadow MMU" left me wondering "when is KVM zapping at all levels?"
KVM: x86/mmu: Zap all possible levels in shadow MMU when collapsing SPTEs
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022, David Matlack wrote:
> Currently KVM only zaps collapsible 4KiB SPTEs in the shadow MMU (i.e.
> in the rmap). This is fine for now KVM never creates intermediate huge
> pages during dirty logging, i.e. a 1GiB page is never partially split to
> a 2MiB page.
"partially" is really confusing. I think what you mean is that KVM can split a
1gb to a 2mb page, and not split all the way down to 4kb. But "partially" makes
it sound like KVM ends up with a huge SPTE that is half split or something. I
think you can just avoid that altogether and be more explicit:
i.e. a 1GiB pager is never split to just 2MiB, dirty logging always splits
down to 4KiB pages.
> However, this will stop being true once the shadow MMU participates in
> eager page splitting, which can in fact leave behind partially split
"partially" again. Maybe
which can in fact leave behind 2MiB pages after splitting 1GiB huge pages.
> huge pages. In preparation for that change, change the shadow MMU to
> iterate over all necessary levels when zapping collapsible SPTEs.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index ed65899d15a2..479c581e8a96 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -6098,18 +6098,25 @@ static bool kvm_mmu_zap_collapsible_spte(struct kvm *kvm,
> return need_tlb_flush;
> }
>
> +static void kvm_rmap_zap_collapsible_sptes(struct kvm *kvm,
> + const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Note, use KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL - 1 since there's no need to zap
> + * pages that are already mapped at the maximum possible level.
> + */
> + if (slot_handle_level(kvm, slot, kvm_mmu_zap_collapsible_spte,
> + PG_LEVEL_4K, KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL - 1,
> + true))
> + kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, slot);
> +}
> +
> void kvm_mmu_zap_collapsible_sptes(struct kvm *kvm,
> const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> {
> if (kvm_memslots_have_rmaps(kvm)) {
> write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> - /*
> - * Zap only 4k SPTEs since the legacy MMU only supports dirty
> - * logging at a 4k granularity and never creates collapsible
> - * 2m SPTEs during dirty logging.
> - */
> - if (slot_handle_level_4k(kvm, slot, kvm_mmu_zap_collapsible_spte, true))
> - kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, slot);
> + kvm_rmap_zap_collapsible_sptes(kvm, slot);
> write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> }
>
> --
> 2.36.0.rc2.479.g8af0fa9b8e-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-09 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-22 21:05 [PATCH v4 00/20] KVM: Extend Eager Page Splitting to the shadow MMU David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 01/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Optimize MMU page cache lookup for all direct SPs David Matlack
2022-05-07 7:46 ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 02/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Use a bool for direct David Matlack
2022-05-07 7:46 ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 03/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Derive shadow MMU page role from parent David Matlack
2022-05-05 21:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-09 22:10 ` David Matlack
2022-05-10 2:38 ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-07 8:28 ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-09 21:04 ` David Matlack
2022-05-10 2:58 ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-10 13:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-12 16:10 ` David Matlack
2022-05-13 18:26 ` David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 04/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Decompose kvm_mmu_get_page() into separate functions David Matlack
2022-05-05 21:58 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 05/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Consolidate shadow page allocation and initialization David Matlack
2022-05-05 22:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-09 20:53 ` David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 06/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename shadow MMU functions that deal with shadow pages David Matlack
2022-05-05 22:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 07/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Move guest PT write-protection to account_shadowed() David Matlack
2022-05-05 22:51 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-09 21:18 ` David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 08/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass memory caches to allocate SPs separately David Matlack
2022-05-05 23:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 09/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Replace vcpu with kvm in kvm_mmu_alloc_shadow_page() David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 10/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass kvm pointer separately from vcpu to kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page() David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 11/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow for NULL vcpu pointer in __kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page() David Matlack
2022-05-05 23:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-09 21:26 ` David Matlack
2022-05-09 22:56 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-09 23:59 ` David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 12/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass const memslot to rmap_add() David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 13/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Decouple rmap_add() and link_shadow_page() from kvm_vcpu David Matlack
2022-05-05 23:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-09 21:27 ` David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 14/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Update page stats in __rmap_add() David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 15/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Cache the access bits of shadowed translations David Matlack
2022-05-06 19:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-09 16:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-09 21:29 ` David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 16/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend make_huge_page_split_spte() for the shadow MMU David Matlack
2022-05-09 16:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-09 21:31 ` David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 17/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap collapsible SPTEs at all levels in " David Matlack
2022-05-09 16:31 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-05-09 21:34 ` David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 18/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Refactor drop_large_spte() David Matlack
2022-05-09 16:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 19/20] KVM: Allow for different capacities in kvm_mmu_memory_cache structs David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 20/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend Eager Page Splitting to nested MMUs David Matlack
2022-05-07 7:51 ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-09 21:40 ` David Matlack
2022-05-09 16:48 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-09 21:44 ` David Matlack
2022-05-09 22:47 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YnlB8n8UMCuaCj1G@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=pfeiner@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).