public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE (KVM)" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] KVM: selftests: Add option to create 2M and 1G EPT mappings
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 16:32:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YoK0yptPVNqOSlD6@xz-m1.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220429183935.1094599-3-dmatlack@google.com>

On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 06:39:28PM +0000, David Matlack wrote:
> The current EPT mapping code in the selftests only supports mapping 4K
> pages. This commit extends that support with an option to map at 2M or
> 1G. This will be used in a future commit to create large page mappings
> to test eager page splitting.
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/vmx.c | 105 ++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/vmx.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/vmx.c
> index d089d8b850b5..1fa2d1059ade 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/vmx.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/vmx.c
> @@ -392,27 +392,60 @@ void nested_vmx_check_supported(void)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -void nested_pg_map(struct vmx_pages *vmx, struct kvm_vm *vm,
> -		   uint64_t nested_paddr, uint64_t paddr)
> +static void nested_create_upper_pte(struct kvm_vm *vm,
> +				    struct eptPageTableEntry *pte,
> +				    uint64_t nested_paddr,
> +				    uint64_t paddr,
> +				    int current_level,
> +				    int target_level)
> +{
> +	if (!pte->readable) {
> +		pte->writable = true;
> +		pte->readable = true;
> +		pte->executable = true;
> +		pte->page_size = (current_level == target_level);
> +		if (pte->page_size)
> +			pte->address = paddr >> vm->page_shift;
> +		else
> +			pte->address = vm_alloc_page_table(vm) >> vm->page_shift;
> +	} else {
> +		/*
> +		 * Entry already present.  Assert that the caller doesn't want
> +		 * a hugepage at this level, and that there isn't a hugepage at
> +		 * this level.
> +		 */
> +		TEST_ASSERT(current_level != target_level,
> +			    "Cannot create hugepage at level: %u, nested_paddr: 0x%lx\n",
> +			    current_level, nested_paddr);
> +		TEST_ASSERT(!pte->page_size,
> +			    "Cannot create page table at level: %u, nested_paddr: 0x%lx\n",
> +			    current_level, nested_paddr);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +
> +void __nested_pg_map(struct vmx_pages *vmx, struct kvm_vm *vm,
> +		     uint64_t nested_paddr, uint64_t paddr, int target_level)
>  {
> +	const uint64_t page_size = PG_LEVEL_SIZE(target_level);
> +	struct eptPageTableEntry *pt;
>  	uint16_t index[4];
> -	struct eptPageTableEntry *pml4e;
>  
>  	TEST_ASSERT(vm->mode == VM_MODE_PXXV48_4K, "Attempt to use "
>  		    "unknown or unsupported guest mode, mode: 0x%x", vm->mode);
>  
> -	TEST_ASSERT((nested_paddr % vm->page_size) == 0,
> +	TEST_ASSERT((nested_paddr % page_size) == 0,
>  		    "Nested physical address not on page boundary,\n"
> -		    "  nested_paddr: 0x%lx vm->page_size: 0x%x",
> -		    nested_paddr, vm->page_size);
> +		    "  nested_paddr: 0x%lx page_size: 0x%lx",
> +		    nested_paddr, page_size);
>  	TEST_ASSERT((nested_paddr >> vm->page_shift) <= vm->max_gfn,
>  		    "Physical address beyond beyond maximum supported,\n"
>  		    "  nested_paddr: 0x%lx vm->max_gfn: 0x%lx vm->page_size: 0x%x",
>  		    paddr, vm->max_gfn, vm->page_size);
> -	TEST_ASSERT((paddr % vm->page_size) == 0,
> +	TEST_ASSERT((paddr % page_size) == 0,
>  		    "Physical address not on page boundary,\n"
> -		    "  paddr: 0x%lx vm->page_size: 0x%x",
> -		    paddr, vm->page_size);
> +		    "  paddr: 0x%lx page_size: 0x%lx",
> +		    paddr, page_size);
>  	TEST_ASSERT((paddr >> vm->page_shift) <= vm->max_gfn,
>  		    "Physical address beyond beyond maximum supported,\n"
>  		    "  paddr: 0x%lx vm->max_gfn: 0x%lx vm->page_size: 0x%x",
> @@ -423,49 +456,25 @@ void nested_pg_map(struct vmx_pages *vmx, struct kvm_vm *vm,
>  	index[2] = (nested_paddr >> 30) & 0x1ffu;
>  	index[3] = (nested_paddr >> 39) & 0x1ffu;
>  
> -	/* Allocate page directory pointer table if not present. */
> -	pml4e = vmx->eptp_hva;
> -	if (!pml4e[index[3]].readable) {
> -		pml4e[index[3]].address = vm_alloc_page_table(vm) >> vm->page_shift;
> -		pml4e[index[3]].writable = true;
> -		pml4e[index[3]].readable = true;
> -		pml4e[index[3]].executable = true;
> -	}
> +	pt = vmx->eptp_hva;
>  
> -	/* Allocate page directory table if not present. */
> -	struct eptPageTableEntry *pdpe;
> -	pdpe = addr_gpa2hva(vm, pml4e[index[3]].address * vm->page_size);
> -	if (!pdpe[index[2]].readable) {
> -		pdpe[index[2]].address = vm_alloc_page_table(vm) >> vm->page_shift;
> -		pdpe[index[2]].writable = true;
> -		pdpe[index[2]].readable = true;
> -		pdpe[index[2]].executable = true;
> -	}
> +	for (int current_level = 3; current_level >= 0; current_level--) {
> +		struct eptPageTableEntry *pte = &pt[index[current_level]];
>  
> -	/* Allocate page table if not present. */
> -	struct eptPageTableEntry *pde;
> -	pde = addr_gpa2hva(vm, pdpe[index[2]].address * vm->page_size);
> -	if (!pde[index[1]].readable) {
> -		pde[index[1]].address = vm_alloc_page_table(vm) >> vm->page_shift;
> -		pde[index[1]].writable = true;
> -		pde[index[1]].readable = true;
> -		pde[index[1]].executable = true;
> -	}
> +		nested_create_upper_pte(vm, pte, nested_paddr, paddr,
> +					current_level, target_level);

This is going to run for the last level pte too, so maybe remove the
"upper" prefix in the helper?

>  
> -	/* Fill in page table entry. */
> -	struct eptPageTableEntry *pte;
> -	pte = addr_gpa2hva(vm, pde[index[1]].address * vm->page_size);
> -	pte[index[0]].address = paddr >> vm->page_shift;
> -	pte[index[0]].writable = true;
> -	pte[index[0]].readable = true;
> -	pte[index[0]].executable = true;
> +		if (pte->page_size)
> +			break;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * For now mark these as accessed and dirty because the only
> -	 * testcase we have needs that.  Can be reconsidered later.
> -	 */
> -	pte[index[0]].accessed = true;
> -	pte[index[0]].dirty = true;

Is it intended to to drop the access/dirty bits here?

> +		pt = addr_gpa2hva(vm, pte->address * vm->page_size);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +void nested_pg_map(struct vmx_pages *vmx, struct kvm_vm *vm,
> +		   uint64_t nested_paddr, uint64_t paddr)
> +{
> +	__nested_pg_map(vmx, vm, nested_paddr, paddr, PG_LEVEL_4K);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> -- 
> 2.36.0.464.gb9c8b46e94-goog
> 

-- 
Peter Xu


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-16 20:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-29 18:39 [PATCH 0/9] KVM: selftests: Add nested support to dirty_log_perf_test David Matlack
2022-04-29 18:39 ` [PATCH 1/9] KVM: selftests: Replace x86_page_size with raw levels David Matlack
2022-05-13 20:04   ` Peter Xu
2022-05-16 22:38     ` David Matlack
2022-04-29 18:39 ` [PATCH 2/9] KVM: selftests: Add option to create 2M and 1G EPT mappings David Matlack
2022-05-16 20:32   ` Peter Xu [this message]
2022-05-16 22:38     ` David Matlack
2022-04-29 18:39 ` [PATCH 3/9] KVM: selftests: Drop stale function parameter comment for nested_map() David Matlack
2022-05-16 20:32   ` Peter Xu
2022-04-29 18:39 ` [PATCH 4/9] KVM: selftests: Refactor nested_map() to specify target level David Matlack
2022-05-16 20:34   ` Peter Xu
2022-04-29 18:39 ` [PATCH 5/9] KVM: selftests: Move VMX_EPT_VPID_CAP_AD_BITS to vmx.h David Matlack
2022-05-16 22:12   ` Peter Xu
2022-04-29 18:39 ` [PATCH 6/9] KVM: selftests: Add a helper to check EPT/VPID capabilities David Matlack
2022-05-16 20:42   ` Peter Xu
2022-04-29 18:39 ` [PATCH 7/9] KVM: selftests: Link selftests directly with lib object files David Matlack
2022-05-16 22:15   ` Peter Xu
2022-04-29 18:39 ` [PATCH 8/9] KVM: selftests: Clean up LIBKVM files in Makefile David Matlack
2022-05-16 22:15   ` Peter Xu
2022-04-29 18:39 ` [PATCH 9/9] KVM: selftests: Add option to run dirty_log_perf_test vCPUs in L2 David Matlack
2022-05-16 22:17   ` Peter Xu
2022-05-16 22:34     ` David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:42       ` Peter Xu
2022-05-16 23:47         ` David Matlack

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YoK0yptPVNqOSlD6@xz-m1.local \
    --to=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox