public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE (KVM)" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] KVM: selftests: Link selftests directly with lib object files
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 18:15:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YoLM5caUPbkJ7DEy@xz-m1.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220429183935.1094599-8-dmatlack@google.com>

On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 06:39:33PM +0000, David Matlack wrote:
> The linker does obey strong/weak symbols when linking static libraries,
> it simply resolves an undefined symbol to the first-encountered symbol.
> This means that defining __weak arch-generic functions and then defining
> arch-specific strong functions to override them in libkvm will not
> always work.
> 
> More specifically, if we have:
> 
> lib/generic.c:
> 
>   void __weak foo(void)
>   {
>           pr_info("weak\n");
>   }
> 
>   void bar(void)
>   {
>           foo();
>   }
> 
> lib/x86_64/arch.c:
> 
>   void foo(void)
>   {
>           pr_info("strong\n");
>   }
> 
> And a selftest that calls bar(), it will print "weak". Now if you make
> generic.o explicitly depend on arch.o (e.g. add function to arch.c that
> is called directly from generic.c) it will print "strong". In other
> words, it seems that the linker is free to throw out arch.o when linking
> because generic.o does not explicitly depend on it, which causes the
> linker to lose the strong symbol.
> 
> One solution is to link libkvm.a with --whole-archive so that the linker
> doesn't throw away object files it thinks are unnecessary. However that
> is a bit difficult to plumb since we are using the common selftests
> makefile rules. An easier solution is to drop libkvm.a just link
> selftests with all the .o files that were originally in libkvm.a.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 13 +++++--------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> index af582d168621..c1eb6acb30de 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> @@ -172,12 +172,13 @@ LDFLAGS += -pthread $(no-pie-option) $(pgste-option)
>  # $(TEST_GEN_PROGS) starts with $(OUTPUT)/
>  include ../lib.mk
>  
> -STATIC_LIBS := $(OUTPUT)/libkvm.a
>  LIBKVM_C := $(filter %.c,$(LIBKVM))
>  LIBKVM_S := $(filter %.S,$(LIBKVM))
>  LIBKVM_C_OBJ := $(patsubst %.c, $(OUTPUT)/%.o, $(LIBKVM_C))
>  LIBKVM_S_OBJ := $(patsubst %.S, $(OUTPUT)/%.o, $(LIBKVM_S))
> -EXTRA_CLEAN += $(LIBKVM_C_OBJ) $(LIBKVM_S_OBJ) $(STATIC_LIBS) cscope.*
> +LIBKVM_OBJS = $(LIBKVM_C_OBJ) $(LIBKVM_S_OBJ)
> +
> +EXTRA_CLEAN += $(LIBKVM_OBJS) cscope.*
>  
>  x := $(shell mkdir -p $(sort $(dir $(LIBKVM_C_OBJ) $(LIBKVM_S_OBJ))))
>  $(LIBKVM_C_OBJ): $(OUTPUT)/%.o: %.c
> @@ -186,13 +187,9 @@ $(LIBKVM_C_OBJ): $(OUTPUT)/%.o: %.c
>  $(LIBKVM_S_OBJ): $(OUTPUT)/%.o: %.S
>  	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(TARGET_ARCH) -c $< -o $@
>  
> -LIBKVM_OBJS = $(LIBKVM_C_OBJ) $(LIBKVM_S_OBJ)
> -$(OUTPUT)/libkvm.a: $(LIBKVM_OBJS)
> -	$(AR) crs $@ $^
> -
>  x := $(shell mkdir -p $(sort $(dir $(TEST_GEN_PROGS))))
> -all: $(STATIC_LIBS)
> -$(TEST_GEN_PROGS): $(STATIC_LIBS)
> +all: $(LIBKVM_OBJS)

Can this line be dropped alongside?  Default targets should have already
been set in ../lib.mk anyway iiuc, and they all depend on the objs.

> +$(TEST_GEN_PROGS): $(LIBKVM_OBJS)

Never know such a difference, but it does seem true to happen..  Good to
learn this.

Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-16 22:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-29 18:39 [PATCH 0/9] KVM: selftests: Add nested support to dirty_log_perf_test David Matlack
2022-04-29 18:39 ` [PATCH 1/9] KVM: selftests: Replace x86_page_size with raw levels David Matlack
2022-05-13 20:04   ` Peter Xu
2022-05-16 22:38     ` David Matlack
2022-04-29 18:39 ` [PATCH 2/9] KVM: selftests: Add option to create 2M and 1G EPT mappings David Matlack
2022-05-16 20:32   ` Peter Xu
2022-05-16 22:38     ` David Matlack
2022-04-29 18:39 ` [PATCH 3/9] KVM: selftests: Drop stale function parameter comment for nested_map() David Matlack
2022-05-16 20:32   ` Peter Xu
2022-04-29 18:39 ` [PATCH 4/9] KVM: selftests: Refactor nested_map() to specify target level David Matlack
2022-05-16 20:34   ` Peter Xu
2022-04-29 18:39 ` [PATCH 5/9] KVM: selftests: Move VMX_EPT_VPID_CAP_AD_BITS to vmx.h David Matlack
2022-05-16 22:12   ` Peter Xu
2022-04-29 18:39 ` [PATCH 6/9] KVM: selftests: Add a helper to check EPT/VPID capabilities David Matlack
2022-05-16 20:42   ` Peter Xu
2022-04-29 18:39 ` [PATCH 7/9] KVM: selftests: Link selftests directly with lib object files David Matlack
2022-05-16 22:15   ` Peter Xu [this message]
2022-04-29 18:39 ` [PATCH 8/9] KVM: selftests: Clean up LIBKVM files in Makefile David Matlack
2022-05-16 22:15   ` Peter Xu
2022-04-29 18:39 ` [PATCH 9/9] KVM: selftests: Add option to run dirty_log_perf_test vCPUs in L2 David Matlack
2022-05-16 22:17   ` Peter Xu
2022-05-16 22:34     ` David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:42       ` Peter Xu
2022-05-16 23:47         ` David Matlack

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YoLM5caUPbkJ7DEy@xz-m1.local \
    --to=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox