From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>, Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE (KVM)" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] KVM: selftests: Add option to run dirty_log_perf_test vCPUs in L2
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 16:37:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YoUg1Fq1tMGISJX5@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALzav=crRhStBy8zouM964ygU7-n72LkMo0m0g4xc5un4Cp1mA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, May 18, 2022, David Matlack wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 8:24 AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
> > Page table allocations are currently hardcoded to come from memslot0. memslot0
> > is required to be in lower DRAM, and thus tops out at ~3gb for all intents and
> > purposes because we need to leave room for the xAPIC.
> >
> > And I would strongly prefer not to plumb back the ability to specificy an alternative
> > memslot for page table allocations, because except for truly pathological tests that
> > functionality is unnecessary and pointless complexity.
> >
> > > I don't think it's very hard - walk the mem regions in kvm_vm.regions
> > > should work for us?
> >
> > Yeah. Alternatively, The test can identity map all of memory <4gb and then also
> > map "guest_test_phys_mem - guest_num_pages". I don't think there's any other memory
> > to deal with, is there?
>
> This isn't necessary for 4-level, but also wouldn't be too hard to
> implement. I can take a stab at implementing in v3 if we think 5-level
> selftests are coming soon.
The current incarnation of nested_map_all_1g() is broken irrespective of 5-level
paging. If MAXPHYADDR > 48, then bits 51:48 will either be ignored or will cause
reserved #PF or #GP[*]. Because the test puts memory at max_gfn, identity mapping
test memory will fail if 4-level paging is used and MAXPHYADDR > 48.
I think the easist thing would be to restrict the "starting" upper gfn to the min
of max_gfn and the max addressable gfn based on whether 4-level or 5-level paging
is in use.
[*] Intel's SDM is comically out-of-date and pretends 5-level EPT doesn't exist,
so I'm not sure what happens if a GPA is greater than the PWL.
Section "28.3.2 EPT Translation Mechanism" still says:
The EPT translation mechanism uses only bits 47:0 of each guest-physical address.
No processors supporting the Intel 64 architecture support more than 48
physical-address bits. Thus, no such processor can produce a guest-physical
address with more than 48 bits. An attempt to use such an address causes a
page fault. An attempt to load CR3 with such an address causes a general-protection
fault. If PAE paging is being used, an attempt to load CR3 that would load a
PDPTE with such an address causes a general-protection fault.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-18 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-17 19:05 [PATCH v2 00/10] KVM: selftests: Add nested support to dirty_log_perf_test David Matlack
2022-05-17 19:05 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] KVM: selftests: Replace x86_page_size with PG_LEVEL_XX David Matlack
2022-05-17 20:26 ` Peter Xu
2022-05-17 19:05 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] KVM: selftests: Add option to create 2M and 1G EPT mappings David Matlack
2022-05-17 20:27 ` Peter Xu
2022-05-17 19:05 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] KVM: selftests: Drop stale function parameter comment for nested_map() David Matlack
2022-05-17 19:05 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] KVM: selftests: Refactor nested_map() to specify target level David Matlack
2022-05-17 19:05 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] KVM: selftests: Move VMX_EPT_VPID_CAP_AD_BITS to vmx.h David Matlack
2022-05-17 19:05 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] KVM: selftests: Add a helper to check EPT/VPID capabilities David Matlack
2022-05-17 19:05 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] KVM: selftests: Link selftests directly with lib object files David Matlack
2022-05-17 19:05 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] KVM: selftests: Drop unnecessary rule for $(LIBKVM_OBJS) David Matlack
2022-05-17 20:21 ` Peter Xu
2022-05-18 17:18 ` David Matlack
2022-05-17 19:05 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] KVM: selftests: Clean up LIBKVM files in Makefile David Matlack
2022-05-17 19:05 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] KVM: selftests: Add option to run dirty_log_perf_test vCPUs in L2 David Matlack
2022-05-17 20:20 ` Peter Xu
2022-05-18 13:51 ` Peter Xu
2022-05-18 15:24 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-18 16:12 ` David Matlack
2022-05-18 16:37 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-05-20 22:01 ` David Matlack
2022-05-20 22:49 ` David Matlack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YoUg1Fq1tMGISJX5@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox