From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Hou Wenlong <houwenlong.hwl@antgroup.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Lan Tianyu <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix wrong gfn range of tlb flushing in kvm_set_pte_rmapp()
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 22:53:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YrZAZXHJTsUp8yuP@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a92b4b56116f0f71ffceab2b4ff3c03f47fd468f.1656039275.git.houwenlong.hwl@antgroup.com>
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022, Hou Wenlong wrote:
> When the spte of hupe page is dropped in kvm_set_pte_rmapp(),
> the whole gfn range covered by the spte should be flushed.
> However, rmap_walk_init_level() doesn't align down the gfn
> for new level like tdp iterator does, then the gfn used in
> kvm_set_pte_rmapp() is not the base gfn of huge page. And
> the size of gfn range is wrong too for huge page. Since
> the base gfn of huge page is more meaningful during the
> rmap walking, so align down the gfn for new level and use
> the correct size of huge page for tlb flushing in
> kvm_set_pte_rmapp().
It's also worth noting that kvm_set_pte_rmapp() is the other user of the rmap
iterators that consumes @gfn, i.e. modifying iterator->gfn is safe-ish.
> Fixes: c3134ce240eed ("KVM: Replace old tlb flush function with new one to flush a specified range.")
> Signed-off-by: Hou Wenlong <houwenlong.hwl@antgroup.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index b8a1f5b46b9d..37bfc88ea212 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -1427,7 +1427,7 @@ static bool kvm_set_pte_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
> }
>
> if (need_flush && kvm_available_flush_tlb_with_range()) {
> - kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address(kvm, gfn, 1);
> + kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address(kvm, gfn, KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level));
> return false;
> }
>
> @@ -1455,7 +1455,7 @@ static void
> rmap_walk_init_level(struct slot_rmap_walk_iterator *iterator, int level)
> {
> iterator->level = level;
> - iterator->gfn = iterator->start_gfn;
> + iterator->gfn = iterator->start_gfn & -KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level);
Hrm, arguably this be done on start_gfn in slot_rmap_walk_init(). Having iter->gfn
be less than iter->start_gfn will be odd.
> iterator->rmap = gfn_to_rmap(iterator->gfn, level, iterator->slot);
> iterator->end_rmap = gfn_to_rmap(iterator->end_gfn, level, iterator->slot);
> }
> --
> 2.31.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-24 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-24 3:36 [PATCH 0/5] Fix wrong gfn range of tlb flushing with range Hou Wenlong
2022-06-24 3:36 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix wrong gfn range of tlb flushing in validate_direct_spte() Hou Wenlong
2022-06-24 3:36 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix wrong gfn range of tlb flushing in kvm_set_pte_rmapp() Hou Wenlong
2022-06-24 22:53 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-06-27 4:00 ` Hou Wenlong
2022-06-24 3:36 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: x86/mmu: Reduce gfn range of tlb flushing in tdp_mmu_map_handle_target_level() Hou Wenlong
2022-06-24 3:37 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix wrong start gfn of tlb flushing with range Hou Wenlong
2022-06-24 3:37 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: x86/mmu: Use 1 as the size of gfn range for tlb flushing in FNAME(invlpg)() Hou Wenlong
2022-06-24 23:06 ` [PATCH 0/5] Fix wrong gfn range of tlb flushing with range Sean Christopherson
2022-06-25 9:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-06-27 4:15 ` Hou Wenlong
2022-06-28 12:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-07-26 22:59 ` David Matlack
2022-07-27 12:14 ` Hou Wenlong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YrZAZXHJTsUp8yuP@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=houwenlong.hwl@antgroup.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox