public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, shuah@kernel.org, maz@kernel.org,
	oliver.upton@linux.dev, shan.gavin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: selftests: Double check on the current CPU in rseq_test
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 15:35:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YtA3s0VRj3x7vO7B@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cd5d029c-b396-45ef-917b-92e054659623@redhat.com>

On Thu, Jul 14, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 7/14/22 10:06, Gavin Shan wrote:
> > In rseq_test, there are two threads created. Those two threads are
> > 'main' and 'migration_thread' separately. We also have the assumption
> > that non-migration status on 'migration-worker' thread guarantees the
> > same non-migration status on 'main' thread. Unfortunately, the assumption
> > isn't true. The 'main' thread can be migrated from one CPU to another
> > one between the calls to sched_getcpu() and READ_ONCE(__rseq.cpu_id).
> > The following assert is raised eventually because of the mismatched
> > CPU numbers.
> > 
> > The issue can be reproduced on arm64 system occasionally.
> 
> Hmm, this does not seem a correct patch - the threads are already
> synchronizing using seq_cnt, like this:
> 
> 	migration			main
> 	----------------------		--------------------------------
> 	seq_cnt = 1
> 	smp_wmb()
> 					snapshot = 0
> 					smp_rmb()
> 					cpu = sched_getcpu() reads 23
> 	sched_setaffinity()
> 					rseq_cpu = __rseq.cpuid reads 35
> 					smp_rmb()
> 					snapshot != seq_cnt -> retry
> 	smp_wmb()
> 	seq_cnt = 2
> 
> sched_setaffinity() is guaranteed to block until the task is enqueued on an
> allowed CPU.

Yes, and retrying could suppress detection of kernel bugs that this test is intended
to catch.

> Can you check that smp_rmb() and smp_wmb() generate correct instructions on
> arm64?

That seems like the most likely scenario (or a kernel bug), I distinctly remember
the barriers provided by tools/ being rather bizarre.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-14 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-14  8:06 [PATCH] KVM: selftests: Double check on the current CPU in rseq_test Gavin Shan
2022-07-14 13:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-07-14 14:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-07-14 15:35   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-07-14 15:42     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-07-15  2:21     ` Gavin Shan
2022-07-15 14:32       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-16 14:46         ` Gavin Shan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YtA3s0VRj3x7vO7B@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=shan.gavin@gmail.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox