From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/11] KVM: x86: SVM: use smram structs
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 00:18:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YtibYud8NY8bgcPZ@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220621150902.46126-11-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> This removes the last user of put_smstate/GET_SMSTATE so
> remove these functions as well.
>
> Also add a sanity check that we don't attempt to enter the SMM
> on non long mode capable guest CPU with a running nested guest.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 6 ------
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 1038ccb7056a39..9e8467be96b4e6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -2057,12 +2057,6 @@ static inline int kvm_cpu_get_apicid(int mps_cpu)
> #endif
> }
>
> -#define put_smstate(type, buf, offset, val) \
> - *(type *)((buf) + (offset) - 0x7e00) = val
> -
> -#define GET_SMSTATE(type, buf, offset) \
> - (*(type *)((buf) + (offset) - 0x7e00))
> -
> int kvm_cpu_dirty_log_size(void);
>
> int memslot_rmap_alloc(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, unsigned long npages);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index 136298cfb3fb57..8dcbbe839bef36 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -4399,6 +4399,7 @@ static int svm_smi_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool for_injection)
>
> static int svm_enter_smm(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *smstate)
> {
> + struct kvm_smram_state_64 *smram = (struct kvm_smram_state_64 *)smstate;
> struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
> struct kvm_host_map map_save;
> int ret;
> @@ -4406,10 +4407,17 @@ static int svm_enter_smm(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *smstate)
> if (!is_guest_mode(vcpu))
> return 0;
>
> - /* FED8h - SVM Guest */
> - put_smstate(u64, smstate, 0x7ed8, 1);
> - /* FEE0h - SVM Guest VMCB Physical Address */
> - put_smstate(u64, smstate, 0x7ee0, svm->nested.vmcb12_gpa);
> + /*
> + * 32 bit SMRAM format doesn't preserve EFER and SVM state.
> + * SVM should not be enabled by the userspace without marking
> + * the CPU as at least long mode capable.
> + */
> +
> + if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SVM))
> + return 1;
Isn't this is an independent bug fix? I.e. should be in its own patch?
> +
> + smram->svm_guest_flag = 1;
> + smram->svm_guest_vmcb_gpa = svm->nested.vmcb12_gpa;
>
> svm->vmcb->save.rax = vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX];
> svm->vmcb->save.rsp = vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RSP];
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-21 0:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-21 15:08 [PATCH v2 00/11] SMM emulation and interrupt shadow fixes Maxim Levitsky
2022-06-21 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] KVM: x86: emulator: em_sysexit should update ctxt->mode Maxim Levitsky
2022-06-21 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] KVM: x86: emulator: introduce update_emulation_mode Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-20 23:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-21 11:52 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-21 14:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-21 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] KVM: x86: emulator: remove assign_eip_near/far Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-20 23:51 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-21 11:52 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-06-21 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] KVM: x86: emulator: update the emulation mode after rsm Maxim Levitsky
2022-06-21 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] KVM: x86: emulator: update the emulation mode after CR0 write Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-20 23:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-21 11:53 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-21 14:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-21 14:57 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-06-21 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] KVM: x86: emulator/smm: number of GPRs in the SMRAM image depends on the image format Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-21 0:06 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-21 0:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-21 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] KVM: x86: emulator/smm: add structs for KVM's smram layout Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-21 0:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-21 11:54 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-06-21 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] KVM: x86: emulator/smm: use smram struct for 32 bit smram load/restore Maxim Levitsky
2022-06-21 15:09 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] KVM: x86: emulator/smm: use smram struct for 64 " Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-21 0:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-21 11:54 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-06-21 15:09 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] KVM: x86: SVM: use smram structs Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-21 0:18 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-07-21 11:54 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-21 0:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-21 11:54 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-06-21 15:09 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] KVM: x86: emulator/smm: preserve interrupt shadow in SMRAM Maxim Levitsky
2022-06-29 16:31 ` Jim Mattson
2022-06-30 6:00 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-06-30 16:00 ` Jim Mattson
2022-07-05 13:38 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-05 13:40 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-05 13:51 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-06 18:13 ` Jim Mattson
2022-07-06 20:00 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-06 20:38 ` Jim Mattson
2022-07-10 16:05 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-06-29 7:21 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] SMM emulation and interrupt shadow fixes Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-14 11:06 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-20 8:47 ` Maxim Levitsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YtibYud8NY8bgcPZ@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox