kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>,
	Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: x86: Apply NX mitigation more precisely
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 17:21:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YuAitajfWA40qQI8@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YuAZDbg9Dzw0LKkp@google.com>

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2022, Mingwei Zhang wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 23, 2022, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > Patch 6 from Mingwei is the end goal of the series.  KVM incorrectly
> > > assumes that the NX huge page mitigation is the only scenario where KVM
> > > will create a non-leaf page instead of a huge page.   Precisely track
> > > (via kvm_mmu_page) if a non-huge page is being forced and use that info
> > > to avoid unnecessarily forcing smaller page sizes in
> > > disallowed_hugepage_adjust().
> > > 
> > > v2: Rebase, tweak a changelog accordingly.
> > 
> > hmm, I applied this patch set (v2) on top of kvm/queue (HEAD:
> > 1a4d88a361af) and it seems kvm-unit-tests/vmx failed on both ept=1 and
> > ept=0. And it did not work on our internel kernel either (kernel
> > crashed).
> > 
> > Maybe there is still minor issues?
> 
> Heh, or not so minor issues.  I'll see what I broke.  I have a bad feeling that
> it's the EPT tests; IIRC I only ran VMX on a platform with MAXPHYADDR < 40.

Hrm, not seeing failures (beyond the VMX_VMCS_ENUM.MAX_INDEX failure because I'm
running an older QEMU).

I'll follow up off-list to figure out what's going on.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-26 17:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-23  1:23 [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: x86: Apply NX mitigation more precisely Sean Christopherson
2022-07-23  1:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Tag disallowed NX huge pages even if they're not tracked Sean Christopherson
2022-07-25 22:49   ` David Matlack
2022-07-25 23:26     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-25 23:45       ` David Matlack
2022-07-26  0:01         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-28 22:11   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-07-23  1:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Properly account NX huge page workaround for nonpaging MMUs Sean Christopherson
2022-07-25 23:05   ` David Matlack
2022-07-25 23:08     ` David Matlack
2022-07-28 20:15   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-07-23  1:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Set disallowed_nx_huge_page in TDP MMU before setting SPTE Sean Christopherson
2022-07-25 23:16   ` David Matlack
2022-07-23  1:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Track the number of TDP MMU pages, but not the actual pages Sean Christopherson
2022-07-25 23:21   ` David Matlack
2022-07-25 23:27     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-27  2:41   ` Yan Zhao
2022-07-27 19:04     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-29  1:02       ` Yan Zhao
2022-07-23  1:23 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Add helper to convert SPTE value to its shadow page Sean Christopherson
2022-07-25 23:23   ` David Matlack
2022-07-25 23:33     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-23  1:23 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] KVM: x86/mmu: explicitly check nx_hugepage in disallowed_hugepage_adjust() Sean Christopherson
2022-07-25 23:28   ` David Matlack
2022-07-26  5:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: x86: Apply NX mitigation more precisely Mingwei Zhang
2022-07-26 16:40   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-26 17:21     ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-07-28 20:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-07-28 21:20   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-28 21:41     ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-07-28 22:09     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-07-28 22:15       ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YuAitajfWA40qQI8@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mizhang@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).