public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, maz@kernel.org,
	seanjc@google.com, oupton@google.com, ricarkol@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: selftests: Randomize page access order
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 16:49:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YvREA1VJA3ryF+io@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220810175830.2175089-4-coltonlewis@google.com>

On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 05:58:30PM +0000, Colton Lewis wrote:
> Add the ability to use random_table to randomize the order in which
> pages are accessed. Add the -a argument to enable this new
> behavior. This should make accesses less predictable and make for a
> more realistic test. It includes the possibility that the same pages
> may be hit multiple times during an iteration.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>
> ---
>  .../testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c | 11 +++++++++--
>  .../selftests/kvm/include/perf_test_util.h      |  2 ++
>  .../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c  | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c
> index dcc5d44fc757..265cb4f7e088 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c
> @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ struct test_params {
>  	bool partition_vcpu_memory_access;
>  	enum vm_mem_backing_src_type backing_src;
>  	int slots;
> +	bool random_access;
>  	uint32_t random_seed;
>  };
>  
> @@ -227,6 +228,7 @@ static void run_test(enum vm_guest_mode mode, void *arg)
>  				 p->partition_vcpu_memory_access);
>  
>  	perf_test_set_wr_fract(vm, p->wr_fract);
> +	perf_test_set_random_access(vm, p->random_access);
>  
>  	guest_num_pages = (nr_vcpus * guest_percpu_mem_size) >> vm->page_shift;
>  	guest_num_pages = vm_adjust_num_guest_pages(mode, guest_num_pages);
> @@ -357,10 +359,11 @@ static void run_test(enum vm_guest_mode mode, void *arg)
>  static void help(char *name)
>  {
>  	puts("");
> -	printf("usage: %s [-h] [-i iterations] [-p offset] [-g] "
> +	printf("usage: %s [-h] [-a] [-r random seed] [-i iterations] [-p offset] [-g] "
>  	       "[-m mode] [-n] [-b vcpu bytes] [-v vcpus] [-o] [-s mem type]"
>  	       "[-x memslots]\n", name);
>  	puts("");
> +	printf(" -a: access memory randomly rather than in order.\n");
>  	printf(" -i: specify iteration counts (default: %"PRIu64")\n",
>  	       TEST_HOST_LOOP_N);
>  	printf(" -g: Do not enable KVM_CAP_MANUAL_DIRTY_LOG_PROTECT2. This\n"
> @@ -403,6 +406,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>  		.partition_vcpu_memory_access = true,
>  		.backing_src = DEFAULT_VM_MEM_SRC,
>  		.slots = 1,
> +		.random_access = false,
>  		.random_seed = time(NULL),
>  	};
>  	int opt;
> @@ -414,8 +418,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>  
>  	guest_modes_append_default();
>  
> -	while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "eghi:p:m:nb:f:v:or:s:x:")) != -1) {
> +	while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "aeghi:p:m:nb:f:v:or:s:x:")) != -1) {
>  		switch (opt) {
> +		case 'a':
> +			p.random_access = true;
> +			break;
>  		case 'e':
>  			/* 'e' is for evil. */
>  			run_vcpus_while_disabling_dirty_logging = true;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/perf_test_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/perf_test_util.h
> index 597875d0c3db..6c6f81ce2216 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/perf_test_util.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/perf_test_util.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ struct perf_test_args {
>  
>  	/* Run vCPUs in L2 instead of L1, if the architecture supports it. */
>  	bool nested;
> +	bool random_access;
>  
>  	struct perf_test_vcpu_args vcpu_args[KVM_MAX_VCPUS];
>  };
> @@ -56,6 +57,7 @@ struct kvm_vm *perf_test_create_vm(enum vm_guest_mode mode, int nr_vcpus,
>  void perf_test_destroy_vm(struct kvm_vm *vm);
>  
>  void perf_test_set_wr_fract(struct kvm_vm *vm, int wr_fract);
> +void perf_test_set_random_access(struct kvm_vm *vm, bool random_access);
>  
>  void perf_test_start_vcpu_threads(int vcpus, void (*vcpu_fn)(struct perf_test_vcpu_args *));
>  void perf_test_join_vcpu_threads(int vcpus);
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c
> index 3c7b93349fef..9838d1ad9166 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ void perf_test_guest_code(uint32_t vcpu_idx)
>  	struct perf_test_vcpu_args *vcpu_args = &pta->vcpu_args[vcpu_idx];
>  	uint64_t gva;
>  	uint64_t pages;
> +	uint64_t addr;
> +	bool random_access = pta->random_access;
> +	bool populated = false;
>  	int i;
>  
>  	gva = vcpu_args->gva;
> @@ -62,7 +65,11 @@ void perf_test_guest_code(uint32_t vcpu_idx)
>  
>  	while (true) {
>  		for (i = 0; i < pages; i++) {
> -			uint64_t addr = gva + (i * pta->guest_page_size);
> +			if (populated && random_access)

Skipping the populate phase makes sense to ensure everything is
populated I guess. What was your rational?

Either way I think this policy should be driven by the test, rather than
harde-coded in perf_test_guest_code(). i.e. Move the call
perf_test_set_random_access() in dirty_log_perf_test.c to just after the
population phase.

> +				addr = gva +
> +					((random_table[vcpu_idx][i] % pages) * pta->guest_page_size);
> +			else
> +				addr = gva + (i * pta->guest_page_size);
>  
>  			if (random_table[vcpu_idx][i] % 100 < pta->wr_fract)
>  				*(uint64_t *)addr = 0x0123456789ABCDEF;
> @@ -70,6 +77,7 @@ void perf_test_guest_code(uint32_t vcpu_idx)
>  				READ_ONCE(*(uint64_t *)addr);
>  		}
>  
> +		populated = true;
>  		GUEST_SYNC(1);
>  	}
>  }
> @@ -169,6 +177,7 @@ struct kvm_vm *perf_test_create_vm(enum vm_guest_mode mode, int nr_vcpus,
>  
>  	/* By default vCPUs will write to memory. */
>  	pta->wr_fract = 100;
> +	pta->random_access = false;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Snapshot the non-huge page size.  This is used by the guest code to
> @@ -276,6 +285,12 @@ void perf_test_set_wr_fract(struct kvm_vm *vm, int wr_fract)
>  	sync_global_to_guest(vm, perf_test_args);
>  }
>  
> +void perf_test_set_random_access(struct kvm_vm *vm, bool random_access)
> +{
> +	perf_test_args.random_access = random_access;
> +	sync_global_to_guest(vm, perf_test_args);
> +}
> +
>  uint64_t __weak perf_test_nested_pages(int nr_vcpus)
>  {
>  	return 0;
> -- 
> 2.37.1.559.g78731f0fdb-goog
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-10 23:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-10 17:58 [PATCH 0/3] KVM: selftests: Randomize memory access of dirty_log_perf_test Colton Lewis
2022-08-10 17:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: selftests: Add random table to randomize memory access Colton Lewis
2022-08-10 23:18   ` David Matlack
2022-08-10 23:26     ` David Matlack
2022-08-12 16:09       ` Colton Lewis
2022-08-10 17:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: selftests: Randomize which pages are written vs read Colton Lewis
2022-08-10 23:33   ` David Matlack
2022-08-10 23:37     ` David Matlack
2022-08-12 16:11       ` Colton Lewis
2022-08-10 17:58 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: selftests: Randomize page access order Colton Lewis
2022-08-10 23:49   ` David Matlack [this message]
2022-08-12 16:24     ` Colton Lewis
2022-08-12 16:28       ` David Matlack
2022-08-12 16:40         ` Colton Lewis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YvREA1VJA3ryF+io@google.com \
    --to=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=ricarkol@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox