From: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>
To: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, maz@kernel.org,
seanjc@google.com, oupton@google.com, ricarkol@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: selftests: Randomize page access order
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 16:24:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YvZ+rTKd8dmezzgu@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YvREA1VJA3ryF+io@google.com>
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 04:49:23PM -0700, David Matlack wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 05:58:30PM +0000, Colton Lewis wrote:
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c
> > index 3c7b93349fef..9838d1ad9166 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c
> > @@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ void perf_test_guest_code(uint32_t vcpu_idx)
> > struct perf_test_vcpu_args *vcpu_args = &pta->vcpu_args[vcpu_idx];
> > uint64_t gva;
> > uint64_t pages;
> > + uint64_t addr;
> > + bool random_access = pta->random_access;
> > + bool populated = false;
> > int i;
> >
> > gva = vcpu_args->gva;
> > @@ -62,7 +65,11 @@ void perf_test_guest_code(uint32_t vcpu_idx)
> >
> > while (true) {
> > for (i = 0; i < pages; i++) {
> > - uint64_t addr = gva + (i * pta->guest_page_size);
> > + if (populated && random_access)
>
> Skipping the populate phase makes sense to ensure everything is
> populated I guess. What was your rational?
That's it. Wanted to ensure everything was populated. Random
population won't hit every page, but those unpopulated pages might be
hit on subsequent iterations. I originally let population be random
too and suspect this was driving an odd behavior I noticed early in
testing where later iterations would be much faster than earlier ones.
> Either way I think this policy should be driven by the test, rather than
> harde-coded in perf_test_guest_code(). i.e. Move the call
> perf_test_set_random_access() in dirty_log_perf_test.c to just after the
> population phase.
That makes sense. Will do.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-12 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-10 17:58 [PATCH 0/3] KVM: selftests: Randomize memory access of dirty_log_perf_test Colton Lewis
2022-08-10 17:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: selftests: Add random table to randomize memory access Colton Lewis
2022-08-10 23:18 ` David Matlack
2022-08-10 23:26 ` David Matlack
2022-08-12 16:09 ` Colton Lewis
2022-08-10 17:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: selftests: Randomize which pages are written vs read Colton Lewis
2022-08-10 23:33 ` David Matlack
2022-08-10 23:37 ` David Matlack
2022-08-12 16:11 ` Colton Lewis
2022-08-10 17:58 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: selftests: Randomize page access order Colton Lewis
2022-08-10 23:49 ` David Matlack
2022-08-12 16:24 ` Colton Lewis [this message]
2022-08-12 16:28 ` David Matlack
2022-08-12 16:40 ` Colton Lewis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YvZ+rTKd8dmezzgu@google.com \
--to=coltonlewis@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox