public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Subject: Re: FYI:  xapic_state_test selftest fails with avic enabled
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 14:19:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YwTh2b8ThbiEA7iq@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cdbe3d8d07557d73d7a96cd4a69e717574494e34.camel@redhat.com>

On Tue, Aug 23, 2022, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I just noticed that this test fails when the AVIC is enabled.
> 
> It seems that it exposes actual shortcomings in the AVIC hardware implementation,
> although these should not matter in real life usage of it.
> 
> 
> First of all it seems that AVIC just allows to set the APIC_ICR_BUSY bit (it should be read-only)
> and it never clears it if set.
> 
> Second AVIC seems to drop writes to low 24 bits of to ICR2, because these are not really used,
> although technically not marked as reserved in the spec (though APIC_ID register in AMD spec,
> states explicity that only bits 24-31 can be set, and the rest are reserved).
> 
> And finally AVIC inhibit when x2apic is exposed to the guest was recently removed,
> because in this case AVIC also works just fine (but with msr emulation) and that
> means that we don't need anymore to hide x2apic from the guest to avoid AVIC inhibit.

KUT's APIC test also fails for a variety of reasons when AVIC is enabled.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220204214410.3315068-1-seanjc@google.com

      reply	other threads:[~2022-08-23 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-23 12:57 FYI: xapic_state_test selftest fails with avic enabled Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-23 14:19 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YwTh2b8ThbiEA7iq@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox