public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/13] KVM: x86: SVM: don't save SVM state to SMRAM when VM is not long mode capable
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 22:58:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YwatBgiVoCv+UNlp@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220803155011.43721-13-mlevitsk@redhat.com>

On Wed, Aug 03, 2022, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> When the guest CPUID doesn't have support for long mode, 32 bit SMRAM
> layout is used and it has no support for preserving EFER and/or SVM
> state.
> 
> Note that this isn't relevant to running 32 bit guests on VM which is
> long mode capable - such VM can still run 32 bit guests in compatibility
> mode.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index 7ca5e06878e19a..64cfd26bc5e7a6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -4442,6 +4442,15 @@ static int svm_enter_smm(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, union kvm_smram *smram)
>  	if (!is_guest_mode(vcpu))
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * 32 bit SMRAM format doesn't preserve EFER and SVM state.
> +	 * SVM should not be enabled by the userspace without marking
> +	 * the CPU as at least long mode capable.

Hmm, or userspace can ensure SMIs never get delivered.  Maybe?

	/*
	 * 32-bit SMRAM format doesn't preserve EFER and SVM state.  Userspace is
	 * responsible for ensuring nested SVM and SMIs are mutually exclusive.
	 */

> +	 */
> +

Unnecessary newline.

> +	if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_LM))
> +		return 1;

This doesn't actually fix anything,  RSM will still jump to L2 state but in L1
context.  I think we first need to actually handle errors from
static_call(kvm_x86_enter_smm).

Given that SVM can't even guarantee nested_svm_simple_vmexit() succeeds, i.e. KVM
can't force the vCPU out of L2 to ensure triple fault would hit L1, killing the VM
seems like the least awful solution (and it's still quite awful).

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 54fa0aa95785..38a6f4089296 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -9985,7 +9985,10 @@ static void enter_smm(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
         * state (e.g. leave guest mode) after we've saved the state into the
         * SMM state-save area.
         */
-       static_call(kvm_x86_enter_smm)(vcpu, &smram);
+       if (static_call(kvm_x86_enter_smm)(vcpu, &smram)) {
+               kvm_vm_dead(vcpu->vm);
+               return;
+       }

        kvm_smm_changed(vcpu, true);
        kvm_vcpu_write_guest(vcpu, vcpu->arch.smbase + 0xfe00, &smram, sizeof(smram));

> +
>  	smram->smram64.svm_guest_flag = 1;
>  	smram->smram64.svm_guest_vmcb_gpa = svm->nested.vmcb12_gpa;
>  
> -- 
> 2.26.3
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-24 22:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-03 15:49 [PATCH v3 00/13] SMM emulation and interrupt shadow fixes Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-03 15:49 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] bug: introduce ASSERT_STRUCT_OFFSET Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-03 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] KVM: x86: emulator: em_sysexit should update ctxt->mode Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-03 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] KVM: x86: emulator: introduce emulator_recalc_and_set_mode Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-11 15:33   ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-08-12  6:25     ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-17 14:42     ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-03 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] KVM: x86: emulator: update the emulation mode after rsm Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-24 21:50   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] KVM: x86: emulator: update the emulation mode after CR0 write Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-24 21:57   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] KVM: x86: emulator/smm: number of GPRs in the SMRAM image depends on the image format Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-03 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] KVM: x86: emulator/smm: add structs for KVM's smram layout Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-24 22:06   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] KVM: x86: emulator/smm: use smram structs in the common code Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-24 22:25   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] KVM: x86: emulator/smm: use smram struct for 32 bit smram load/restore Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-24 22:28   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] KVM: x86: emulator/smm: use smram struct for 64 " Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-24 22:34   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] KVM: x86: SVM: use smram structs Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-24 22:42   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] KVM: x86: SVM: don't save SVM state to SMRAM when VM is not long mode capable Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-24 22:58   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-08-03 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] KVM: x86: emulator/smm: preserve interrupt shadow in SMRAM Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-24 23:50   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-25 10:13     ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-25 15:44       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-10 12:00 ` [PATCH v3 00/13] SMM emulation and interrupt shadow fixes Thomas Lamprecht
2022-08-10 13:25   ` Maxim Levitsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YwatBgiVoCv+UNlp@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox