From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, maz@kernel.org,
seanjc@google.com, oupton@google.com, ricarkol@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: selftests: Randomize which pages are written vs read.
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 15:13:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YwlFcGn4w34uXPQd@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220817214146.3285106-3-coltonlewis@google.com>
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 09:41:45PM +0000, Colton Lewis wrote:
> Randomize which tables are written vs read using the random number
> arrays. Change the variable wr_fract and associated function calls to
> write_percent that now operates as a percentage from 0 to 100 where X
> means each page has an X% chance of being written. Change the -f
> argument to -w to reflect the new variable semantics. Keep the same
> default of 100 percent writes.
Doesn't the new option cause like a 1000x slowdown in "Dirty memory
time"? I don't think we should merge this until that is understood and
addressed (and it should be at least called out here so that reviewers
can be made aware).
>
> Signed-off-by: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>
> ---
> .../selftests/kvm/access_tracking_perf_test.c | 2 +-
> .../selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c | 28 ++++++++++---------
> .../selftests/kvm/include/perf_test_util.h | 4 +--
> .../selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c | 9 +++---
> 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/access_tracking_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/access_tracking_perf_test.c
> index 1c2749b1481a..e87696b60e0f 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/access_tracking_perf_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/access_tracking_perf_test.c
> @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static void run_iteration(struct kvm_vm *vm, int nr_vcpus, const char *descripti
> static void access_memory(struct kvm_vm *vm, int nr_vcpus,
> enum access_type access, const char *description)
> {
> - perf_test_set_wr_fract(vm, (access == ACCESS_READ) ? INT_MAX : 1);
> + perf_test_set_write_percent(vm, (access == ACCESS_READ) ? 0 : 100);
> iteration_work = ITERATION_ACCESS_MEMORY;
> run_iteration(vm, nr_vcpus, description);
> }
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c
> index 362b946019e9..9226eeea79bc 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c
> @@ -128,10 +128,10 @@ static void vcpu_worker(struct perf_test_vcpu_args *vcpu_args)
> struct test_params {
> unsigned long iterations;
> uint64_t phys_offset;
> - int wr_fract;
> bool partition_vcpu_memory_access;
> enum vm_mem_backing_src_type backing_src;
> int slots;
> + uint32_t write_percent;
> uint32_t random_seed;
> };
>
> @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static void run_test(enum vm_guest_mode mode, void *arg)
> p->partition_vcpu_memory_access);
>
> perf_test_set_random_seed(vm, p->random_seed);
> - perf_test_set_wr_fract(vm, p->wr_fract);
> + perf_test_set_write_percent(vm, p->write_percent);
>
> guest_num_pages = (nr_vcpus * guest_percpu_mem_size) >> vm->page_shift;
> guest_num_pages = vm_adjust_num_guest_pages(mode, guest_num_pages);
> @@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ static void help(char *name)
> puts("");
> printf("usage: %s [-h] [-i iterations] [-p offset] [-g] "
> "[-m mode] [-n] [-b vcpu bytes] [-v vcpus] [-o] [-r random seed ] [-s mem type]"
> - "[-x memslots]\n", name);
> + "[-x memslots] [-w percentage]\n", name);
> puts("");
> printf(" -i: specify iteration counts (default: %"PRIu64")\n",
> TEST_HOST_LOOP_N);
> @@ -375,10 +375,6 @@ static void help(char *name)
> printf(" -b: specify the size of the memory region which should be\n"
> " dirtied by each vCPU. e.g. 10M or 3G.\n"
> " (default: 1G)\n");
> - printf(" -f: specify the fraction of pages which should be written to\n"
> - " as opposed to simply read, in the form\n"
> - " 1/<fraction of pages to write>.\n"
> - " (default: 1 i.e. all pages are written to.)\n");
> printf(" -v: specify the number of vCPUs to run.\n");
> printf(" -o: Overlap guest memory accesses instead of partitioning\n"
> " them into a separate region of memory for each vCPU.\n");
> @@ -386,6 +382,11 @@ static void help(char *name)
> backing_src_help("-s");
> printf(" -x: Split the memory region into this number of memslots.\n"
> " (default: 1)\n");
> + printf(" -w: specify the percentage of pages which should be written to\n"
> + " as an integer from 0-100 inclusive. This is probabalistic,\n"
> + " so -w X means each page has an X%% chance of writing\n"
> + " and a (100-X)%% chance of reading.\n"
> + " (default: 100 i.e. all pages are written to.)\n");
> puts("");
> exit(0);
> }
> @@ -395,10 +396,10 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> int max_vcpus = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS);
> struct test_params p = {
> .iterations = TEST_HOST_LOOP_N,
> - .wr_fract = 1,
> .partition_vcpu_memory_access = true,
> .backing_src = DEFAULT_VM_MEM_SRC,
> .slots = 1,
> + .write_percent = 100,
> .random_seed = time(NULL),
> };
> int opt;
> @@ -410,7 +411,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>
> guest_modes_append_default();
>
> - while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "eghi:p:m:nb:f:v:or:s:x:")) != -1) {
> + while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "eghi:p:m:nb:v:or:s:x:w:")) != -1) {
> switch (opt) {
> case 'e':
> /* 'e' is for evil. */
> @@ -433,10 +434,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> case 'b':
> guest_percpu_mem_size = parse_size(optarg);
> break;
> - case 'f':
> - p.wr_fract = atoi(optarg);
> - TEST_ASSERT(p.wr_fract >= 1,
> - "Write fraction cannot be less than one");
> + case 'w':
> + perf_test_args.write_percent = atoi(optarg);
> + TEST_ASSERT(perf_test_args.write_percent >= 0
> + && perf_test_args.write_percent <= 100,
> + "Write percentage must be between 0 and 100");
perf_test_create_vm() overwrites this with 100. Did you mean
p.write_percent?
> break;
> case 'v':
> nr_vcpus = atoi(optarg);
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/perf_test_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/perf_test_util.h
> index 9517956424fc..8da4a839c585 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/perf_test_util.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/perf_test_util.h
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ struct perf_test_args {
> uint64_t size;
> uint64_t guest_page_size;
> uint32_t random_seed;
> - int wr_fract;
> + int write_percent;
>
> /* Run vCPUs in L2 instead of L1, if the architecture supports it. */
> bool nested;
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ struct kvm_vm *perf_test_create_vm(enum vm_guest_mode mode, int nr_vcpus,
> bool partition_vcpu_memory_access);
> void perf_test_destroy_vm(struct kvm_vm *vm);
>
> -void perf_test_set_wr_fract(struct kvm_vm *vm, int wr_fract);
> +void perf_test_set_write_percent(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t write_percent);
> void perf_test_set_random_seed(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t random_seed);
>
> void perf_test_start_vcpu_threads(int vcpus, void (*vcpu_fn)(struct perf_test_vcpu_args *));
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c
> index 8d85923acb4e..1a6b69713337 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ void perf_test_guest_code(uint32_t vcpu_idx)
> struct perf_test_vcpu_args *vcpu_args = &pta->vcpu_args[vcpu_idx];
> uint64_t gva;
> uint64_t pages;
> + uint32_t *rnd_arr = (uint32_t *)vcpu_args->random_array;
> int i;
>
> gva = vcpu_args->gva;
> @@ -60,7 +61,7 @@ void perf_test_guest_code(uint32_t vcpu_idx)
> for (i = 0; i < pages; i++) {
> uint64_t addr = gva + (i * pta->guest_page_size);
>
> - if (i % pta->wr_fract == 0)
> + if (rnd_arr[i] % 100 < pta->write_percent)
> *(uint64_t *)addr = 0x0123456789ABCDEF;
> else
> READ_ONCE(*(uint64_t *)addr);
> @@ -150,7 +151,7 @@ struct kvm_vm *perf_test_create_vm(enum vm_guest_mode mode, int nr_vcpus,
> pr_info("Testing guest mode: %s\n", vm_guest_mode_string(mode));
>
> /* Set perf_test_args defaults. */
> - pta->wr_fract = 100;
> + pta->write_percent = 100;
> pta->random_seed = time(NULL);
>
> /*
> @@ -258,9 +259,9 @@ void perf_test_destroy_vm(struct kvm_vm *vm)
> kvm_vm_free(vm);
> }
>
> -void perf_test_set_wr_fract(struct kvm_vm *vm, int wr_fract)
> +void perf_test_set_write_percent(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t write_percent)
> {
> - perf_test_args.wr_fract = wr_fract;
> + perf_test_args.write_percent = write_percent;
> sync_global_to_guest(vm, perf_test_args);
> }
>
> --
> 2.37.1.595.g718a3a8f04-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-26 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-17 21:41 [PATCH v2 0/3] Randomize memory access of dirty_log_perf_test Colton Lewis
2022-08-17 21:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: selftests: Create source of randomness for guest code Colton Lewis
2022-08-26 21:58 ` David Matlack
2022-08-30 19:01 ` Colton Lewis
2022-09-01 17:52 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-09-01 18:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-02 11:20 ` Andrew Jones
2022-09-01 17:37 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-08-17 21:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: selftests: Randomize which pages are written vs read Colton Lewis
2022-08-26 22:13 ` David Matlack [this message]
2022-08-30 19:02 ` Colton Lewis
2022-09-08 18:51 ` David Matlack
2022-09-08 19:46 ` Colton Lewis
2022-09-08 19:52 ` David Matlack
2022-08-17 21:41 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: selftests: Randomize page access order Colton Lewis
2022-08-18 21:41 ` Colton Lewis
2022-08-26 22:20 ` David Matlack
2022-08-30 19:02 ` Colton Lewis
2022-09-01 17:43 ` Ricardo Koller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YwlFcGn4w34uXPQd@google.com \
--to=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).