public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	mlevitsk@redhat.com, vkuznets@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] KVM: x86: remove return value of kvm_vcpu_block
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 00:42:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YykMc2NDOzvG+xoy@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yv0aHXcmuivyJDXw@google.com>

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Side topic, usage of kvm_apic_accept_events() appears to be broken (though nothing
> can trigger the bug).  If kvm_apic_accept_events() were to return an -errno, then
> kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run() would return '0' to userspace without updating
> vcpu->run->exit_reason.  I think an easy fix is to drop the return value entirely
> and then WARN if kvm_check_nested_events() returns something other than -EBUSY.
> 
> 	if (is_guest_mode(vcpu)) {
> 		r = kvm_check_nested_events(vcpu);
> 		if (r < 0) {
> 			WARN_ON_ONCE(r != -EBUSY);
> 			return;
> 		}

For posterity, I was wrong.  Way down the stack, vmx_complete_nested_posted_interrupt()
can return -ENXIO after filling vcpu->run->exit_reason via kvm_handle_memory_failure().
That's the entire reason why negative values from kvm_check_nested_events() and
kvm_apic_accept_events() are morphed to '0', i.e. to "exit to userspace".


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-20  0:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-11 21:05 [PATCH v2 0/9] KVM: x86: never write to memory from kvm_vcpu_check_block Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-11 21:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] KVM: x86: check validity of argument to KVM_SET_MP_STATE Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-15 13:31   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-16 22:50     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-11 21:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] KVM: x86: remove return value of kvm_vcpu_block Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-16 23:34   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-17 14:10     ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-17 15:31     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-17 16:41       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-17 16:49         ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-20  0:42         ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-08-11 21:05 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] KVM: x86: make kvm_vcpu_{block,halt} return whether vCPU is runnable Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-11 21:06 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] KVM: mips, x86: do not rely on KVM_REQ_UNHALT Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-11 21:06 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] KVM: remove KVM_REQ_UNHALT Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-11 21:06 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] KVM: x86: make vendor code check for all nested events Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-16 23:47   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-17 14:10   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-11 21:06 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] KVM: nVMX: Make an event request when pending an MTF nested VM-Exit Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-17 14:11   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-11 21:06 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] KVM: x86: lapic does not have to process INIT if it is blocked Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-17  0:07   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-17 14:11     ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-17 15:33       ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-11 21:06 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] KVM: x86: never write to memory from kvm_vcpu_check_block Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-16 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-17 14:11     ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-09-20  0:32   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-20  0:55   ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YykMc2NDOzvG+xoy@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox