From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 08/13] x86/pmu: Add PDCM check before accessing PERF_CAP register
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 22:28:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yz4FFub+k79nyALC@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220819110939.78013-9-likexu@tencent.com>
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022, Like Xu wrote:
> From: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
>
> On virtual platforms without PDCM support (e.g. AMD), #GP
> failure on MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES is completely avoidable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
> ---
> x86/pmu.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/x86/pmu.c b/x86/pmu.c
> index 4eb92d8..25fafbe 100644
> --- a/x86/pmu.c
> +++ b/x86/pmu.c
> @@ -669,7 +669,8 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
>
> check_counters();
>
> - if (rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES) & PMU_CAP_FW_WRITES) {
> + if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PDCM) &&
> + (rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES) & PMU_CAP_FW_WRITES)) {
pmu_pebs.c ends up with similar code. Maybe add a helper?
static inline u64 this_cpu_perf_capabilities(void)
{
if (!this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PDCM))
return 0;
rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES);
}
Or even better, if we end up with a lib/pmu and something like "struct pmu_caps",
the RDMSR can be done once in the library's init routine.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-05 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-19 11:09 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 00/13] x86/pmu: Test case optimization, fixes and additions Like Xu
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 01/13] x86/pmu: Introduce __start_event() to drop all of the manual zeroing Like Xu
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 02/13] x86/pmu: Introduce multiple_{one, many}() to improve readability Like Xu
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 03/13] x86/pmu: Reset the expected count of the fixed counter 0 when i386 Like Xu
2022-10-05 22:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-17 7:30 ` Like Xu
2022-10-21 19:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 04/13] x86/pmu: Add tests for Intel Processor Event Based Sampling (PEBS) Like Xu
2022-10-05 22:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-05 22:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 05/13] x86: create pmu group for quick pmu-scope testing Like Xu
2022-10-05 22:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 06/13] x86/pmu: Test emulation instructions on full-width counters Like Xu
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 07/13] x86/pmu: Pop up FW prefix to avoid out-of-context propagation Like Xu
2022-10-05 22:25 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 08/13] x86/pmu: Add PDCM check before accessing PERF_CAP register Like Xu
2022-10-05 22:28 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 09/13] x86/pmu: Report SKIP when testing Intel LBR on AMD platforms Like Xu
2022-10-05 22:29 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 10/13] x86/pmu: Update testcases to cover Intel Arch PMU Version 1 Like Xu
2022-09-06 7:15 ` Sandipan Das
2022-09-06 13:28 ` Like Xu
2022-09-06 8:16 ` Sandipan Das
2022-09-06 13:35 ` Like Xu
2022-09-08 8:23 ` Sandipan Das
2022-09-19 7:09 ` Like Xu
2022-10-21 7:32 ` Like Xu
2022-10-25 8:34 ` Sandipan Das
2022-10-05 22:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-18 9:32 ` Like Xu
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 11/13] x86/pmu: Refine message when testing PMU on AMD platforms Like Xu
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 12/13] x86/pmu: Add assignment framework for Intel-specific HW resources Like Xu
2022-09-06 7:19 ` Sandipan Das
2022-10-05 22:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-21 7:21 ` Like Xu
2022-10-21 18:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 13/13] x86/pmu: Update testcases to cover AMD PMU Like Xu
2022-09-06 7:32 ` Sandipan Das
2022-10-05 22:48 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yz4FFub+k79nyALC@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox