From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 13/13] x86/pmu: Update testcases to cover AMD PMU
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 22:48:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yz4JwQcXIG+sQmp5@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220819110939.78013-14-likexu@tencent.com>
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022, Like Xu wrote:
> diff --git a/lib/x86/processor.h b/lib/x86/processor.h
> index 0324220..10bca27 100644
> --- a/lib/x86/processor.h
> +++ b/lib/x86/processor.h
> @@ -793,6 +793,9 @@ static inline void flush_tlb(void)
>
> static inline u8 pmu_version(void)
> {
> + if (!is_intel())
> + return 0;
> +
> return cpuid(10).a & 0xff;
> }
>
> @@ -806,19 +809,39 @@ static inline bool this_cpu_has_perf_global_ctrl(void)
> return pmu_version() > 1;
> }
>
> +#define AMD64_NUM_COUNTERS 4
> +#define AMD64_NUM_COUNTERS_CORE 6
> +
> +static inline bool has_amd_perfctr_core(void)
> +{
> + return cpuid(0x80000001).c & BIT_ULL(23);
Add an X86_FEATURE_*, maybe X86_FEATURE_AMD_PERF_EXTENSIONS?
> +}
> +
> static inline u8 pmu_nr_gp_counters(void)
> {
> - return (cpuid(10).a >> 8) & 0xff;
> + if (is_intel()) {
No curly braces.
> + return (cpuid(10).a >> 8) & 0xff;
> + } else if (!has_amd_perfctr_core()) {
Drop the "else", the above "if" is terminal.
> + return AMD64_NUM_COUNTERS;
> + }
> +
> + return AMD64_NUM_COUNTERS_CORE;
> }
>
> static inline u8 pmu_gp_counter_width(void)
> {
> - return (cpuid(10).a >> 16) & 0xff;
> + if (is_intel())
> + return (cpuid(10).a >> 16) & 0xff;
> + else
> + return 48;
Please add a #define for this magic number.
> }
>
> static inline u8 pmu_gp_counter_mask_length(void)
> {
> - return (cpuid(10).a >> 24) & 0xff;
> + if (is_intel())
> + return (cpuid(10).a >> 24) & 0xff;
> + else
> + return pmu_nr_gp_counters();
> }
>
> static inline u8 pmu_nr_fixed_counters(void)
> @@ -843,6 +866,9 @@ static inline u8 pmu_fixed_counter_width(void)
>
> static inline bool pmu_gp_counter_is_available(int i)
> {
> + if (!is_intel())
> + return i < pmu_nr_gp_counters();
> +
> /* CPUID.0xA.EBX bit is '1 if they counter is NOT available. */
> return !(cpuid(10).b & BIT(i));
> }
> diff --git a/x86/pmu.c b/x86/pmu.c
> index 0706cb1..b6ab10c 100644
> --- a/x86/pmu.c
> +++ b/x86/pmu.c
> @@ -62,6 +62,11 @@ struct pmu_event {
> {"fixed 1", MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0, 10*N, 10.2*N},
> {"fixed 2", MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 + 1, 1*N, 30*N},
> {"fixed 3", MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 + 2, 0.1*N, 30*N}
> +}, amd_gp_events[] = {
> + {"core cycles", 0x0076, 1*N, 50*N},
> + {"instructions", 0x00c0, 10*N, 10.2*N},
> + {"branches", 0x00c2, 1*N, 1.1*N},
> + {"branch misses", 0x00c3, 0, 0.1*N},
> };
>
> #define PMU_CAP_FW_WRITES (1ULL << 13)
> @@ -105,14 +110,24 @@ static bool check_irq(void)
>
> static bool is_gp(pmu_counter_t *evt)
> {
> + if (!is_intel())
> + return true;
> +
> return evt->ctr < MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 ||
> evt->ctr >= MSR_IA32_PMC0;
> }
>
> static int event_to_global_idx(pmu_counter_t *cnt)
> {
> - return cnt->ctr - (is_gp(cnt) ? gp_counter_base :
> - (MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 - FIXED_CNT_INDEX));
> + if (is_intel())
> + return cnt->ctr - (is_gp(cnt) ? gp_counter_base :
> + (MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 - FIXED_CNT_INDEX));
> +
> + if (gp_counter_base == MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR0) {
Unnecessary curly braces.
> + return (cnt->ctr - gp_counter_base) / 2;
> + } else {
> + return cnt->ctr - gp_counter_base;
> + }
> }
>
> static struct pmu_event* get_counter_event(pmu_counter_t *cnt)
> @@ -736,5 +783,11 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
> report_prefix_pop();
> }
>
> + if (!is_intel()) {
> + report_prefix_push("K7");
> + amd_switch_to_non_perfctr_core();
> + check_counters();
"K7" prefix needs to be popped.
> + }
> +
> return report_summary();
> }
> --
> 2.37.2
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-05 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-19 11:09 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 00/13] x86/pmu: Test case optimization, fixes and additions Like Xu
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 01/13] x86/pmu: Introduce __start_event() to drop all of the manual zeroing Like Xu
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 02/13] x86/pmu: Introduce multiple_{one, many}() to improve readability Like Xu
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 03/13] x86/pmu: Reset the expected count of the fixed counter 0 when i386 Like Xu
2022-10-05 22:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-17 7:30 ` Like Xu
2022-10-21 19:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 04/13] x86/pmu: Add tests for Intel Processor Event Based Sampling (PEBS) Like Xu
2022-10-05 22:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-05 22:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 05/13] x86: create pmu group for quick pmu-scope testing Like Xu
2022-10-05 22:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 06/13] x86/pmu: Test emulation instructions on full-width counters Like Xu
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 07/13] x86/pmu: Pop up FW prefix to avoid out-of-context propagation Like Xu
2022-10-05 22:25 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 08/13] x86/pmu: Add PDCM check before accessing PERF_CAP register Like Xu
2022-10-05 22:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 09/13] x86/pmu: Report SKIP when testing Intel LBR on AMD platforms Like Xu
2022-10-05 22:29 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 10/13] x86/pmu: Update testcases to cover Intel Arch PMU Version 1 Like Xu
2022-09-06 7:15 ` Sandipan Das
2022-09-06 13:28 ` Like Xu
2022-09-06 8:16 ` Sandipan Das
2022-09-06 13:35 ` Like Xu
2022-09-08 8:23 ` Sandipan Das
2022-09-19 7:09 ` Like Xu
2022-10-21 7:32 ` Like Xu
2022-10-25 8:34 ` Sandipan Das
2022-10-05 22:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-18 9:32 ` Like Xu
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 11/13] x86/pmu: Refine message when testing PMU on AMD platforms Like Xu
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 12/13] x86/pmu: Add assignment framework for Intel-specific HW resources Like Xu
2022-09-06 7:19 ` Sandipan Das
2022-10-05 22:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-21 7:21 ` Like Xu
2022-10-21 18:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 13/13] x86/pmu: Update testcases to cover AMD PMU Like Xu
2022-09-06 7:32 ` Sandipan Das
2022-10-05 22:48 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yz4JwQcXIG+sQmp5@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox